From 9b1ce0acb5e65e9ea1e6b322562d072f9f7d1f6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Neeraj Upadhyay Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 23:37:03 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] rcu/tree: Remove CONFIG_PREMPT_RCU check in force_qs_rnp() Originally, the call to rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp() from force_qs_rnp() had to be conditioned on CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y, as in commit a77da14ce9af ("rcu: Yet another fix for preemption and CPU hotplug"). However, there is now a CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=n definition of rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp() that unconditionally returns zero, so invoking it is now safe. In addition, the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=n definition of rcu_initiate_boost() simply releases the rcu_node structure's ->lock, which is what happens when the "if" condition evaluates to false. This commit therefore drops the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU) check, so that rcu_initiate_boost() is called only in CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y kernels when there are readers blocking the current grace period. This does not change the behavior, but reduces code-reader confusion by eliminating non-CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y calls to rcu_initiate_boost(). Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index 4770d7709dc2..acc926f07dc1 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -2533,8 +2533,7 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(int (*f)(struct rcu_data *rdp)) raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags); rcu_state.cbovldnext |= !!rnp->cbovldmask; if (rnp->qsmask == 0) { - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU) || - rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) { + if (rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) { /* * No point in scanning bits because they * are all zero. But we might need to