iio: dac: ad5624r: Fix incorrect handling of an optional regulator.

[ Upstream commit 97683c851f ]

The naming of the regulator is problematic.  VCC is usually a supply
voltage whereas these devices have a separate VREF pin.

Secondly, the regulator core might have provided a stub regulator if
a real regulator wasn't provided. That would in turn have failed to
provide a voltage when queried. So reality was that there was no way
to use the internal reference.

In order to avoid breaking any dts out in the wild, make sure to fallback
to the original vcc naming if vref is not available.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Acked-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210627163244.1090296-9-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Cameron 2021-06-27 17:32:37 +01:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent e78a0b4a33
commit 9f11de5601

View file

@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int ad5624r_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
if (!indio_dev)
return -ENOMEM;
st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
st->reg = devm_regulator_get(&spi->dev, "vcc");
st->reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(&spi->dev, "vref");
if (!IS_ERR(st->reg)) {
ret = regulator_enable(st->reg);
if (ret)
@ -240,6 +240,22 @@ static int ad5624r_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
goto error_disable_reg;
voltage_uv = ret;
} else {
if (PTR_ERR(st->reg) != -ENODEV)
return PTR_ERR(st->reg);
/* Backwards compatibility. This naming is not correct */
st->reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(&spi->dev, "vcc");
if (!IS_ERR(st->reg)) {
ret = regulator_enable(st->reg);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->reg);
if (ret < 0)
goto error_disable_reg;
voltage_uv = ret;
}
}
spi_set_drvdata(spi, indio_dev);