[ARM] pxa: build pwm.c according to HAVE_PWM instead of PXA_PWM

The PXA_PWM config option is really redundant since the introduction
of HAVE_PWM, replace that with HAVE_PWM to avoid confusion.

Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Miao 2009-04-13 16:09:21 +08:00 committed by Eric Miao
parent a757ad8b39
commit a71ef16327
2 changed files with 1 additions and 7 deletions

View file

@ -505,12 +505,6 @@ config PXA_SSP
help
Enable support for PXA2xx SSP ports
config PXA_PWM
tristate
default BACKLIGHT_PWM
help
Enable support for PXA2xx/PXA3xx PWM controllers
config TOSA_BT
tristate "Control the state of built-in bluetooth chip on Sharp SL-6000"
depends on MACH_TOSA

View file

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ endif
# Generic drivers that other drivers may depend upon
obj-$(CONFIG_PXA_SSP) += ssp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PXA_PWM) += pwm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM) += pwm.o
# SoC-specific code
obj-$(CONFIG_PXA25x) += mfp-pxa2xx.o pxa2xx.o pxa25x.o