lib/list_sort: test: use more reasonable printk levels

I do not see any reason to use KERN_WARN for normal messages and
KERN_EMERG for error messages in the lib_sort testing routine.  Let's use
more reasonable KERN_NORM and KERN_ERR levels.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Cc: Don Mullis <don.mullis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Artem Bityutskiy 2010-10-26 14:23:06 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 6d411e6c01
commit bb2ab10fa6
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
struct list_head *head = kmalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL);
struct list_head *cur;
printk(KERN_WARNING "testing list_sort()\n");
printk(KERN_DEBUG "testing list_sort()\n");
cur = head;
for (i = 0; i < LIST_SORT_TEST_LENGTH; i++) {
@ -189,17 +189,17 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
struct debug_el *el = container_of(cur, struct debug_el, l_h);
int cmp_result = cmp(NULL, cur, cur->next);
if (cur->next->prev != cur) {
printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() returned "
"a corrupted list!\n");
printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() returned "
"a corrupted list!\n");
return 1;
} else if (cmp_result > 0) {
printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() failed to sort!\n");
printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() failed to sort!\n");
return 1;
} else if (cmp_result == 0 &&
el->serial >= container_of(cur->next,
struct debug_el, l_h)->serial) {
printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() failed to preserve order"
" of equivalent elements!\n");
printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() failed to preserve order "
"of equivalent elements!\n");
return 1;
}
kfree(cur->prev);
@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
}
kfree(cur);
if (count != LIST_SORT_TEST_LENGTH) {
printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() returned list of"
"different length!\n");
printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() returned list of "
"different length!\n");
return 1;
}
return 0;