mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-10-30 08:02:30 +00:00
bridge: is PACKET_LOOPBACK unlikely()?
While looking at using netdev_rx_handler_register for openvswitch Jesse Gross suggested that an unlikely() might be worthwhile in that code. I'm interested to see if its appropriate for the bridge code. Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fcb12fd223
commit
c2368e795c
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ struct sk_buff *br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
|
|||
const unsigned char *dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest;
|
||||
int (*rhook)(struct sk_buff *skb);
|
||||
|
||||
if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK)
|
||||
if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK))
|
||||
return skb;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!is_valid_ether_addr(eth_hdr(skb)->h_source))
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue