ARM: 9294/2: vfp: Fix broken softirq handling with instrumentation enabled

Commit 62b95a7b44 ("ARM: 9282/1: vfp: Manipulate task VFP state with
softirqs disabled") replaced the en/disable preemption calls inside the
VFP state handling code with en/disabling of soft IRQs, which is
necessary to allow kernel use of the VFP/SIMD unit when handling a soft
IRQ.

Unfortunately, when lockdep is enabled (or other instrumentation that
enables TRACE_IRQFLAGS), the disable path implemented in asm fails to
perform the lockdep and RCU related bookkeeping, resulting in spurious
warnings and other badness.

Set let's rework the VFP entry code a little bit so we can make the
local_bh_disable() call from C, with all the instrumentations that
happen to have been configured. Calling local_bh_enable() can be done
from asm, as it is a simple wrapper around __local_bh_enable_ip(), which
is always a callable function.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZBBYCSZUJOWBg1s8@localhost.localdomain/

Fixes: 62b95a7b44 ("ARM: 9282/1: vfp: Manipulate task VFP state with softirqs disabled")
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Ard Biesheuvel 2023-04-12 09:50:20 +01:00 committed by Russell King (Oracle)
parent 3a2bdad0b4
commit c76c6c4ecb
4 changed files with 29 additions and 34 deletions

View File

@ -244,19 +244,6 @@ THUMB( fpreg .req r7 )
.endm
#endif
.macro local_bh_disable, ti, tmp
ldr \tmp, [\ti, #TI_PREEMPT]
add \tmp, \tmp, #SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET
str \tmp, [\ti, #TI_PREEMPT]
.endm
.macro local_bh_enable_ti, ti, tmp
get_thread_info \ti
ldr \tmp, [\ti, #TI_PREEMPT]
sub \tmp, \tmp, #SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET
str \tmp, [\ti, #TI_PREEMPT]
.endm
#define USERL(l, x...) \
9999: x; \
.pushsection __ex_table,"a"; \

View File

@ -24,14 +24,5 @@
ENTRY(do_vfp)
mov r1, r10
mov r3, r9
ldr r4, .LCvfp
ldr pc, [r4] @ call VFP entry point
b vfp_entry
ENDPROC(do_vfp)
ENTRY(vfp_null_entry)
ret lr
ENDPROC(vfp_null_entry)
.align 2
.LCvfp:
.word vfp_vector

View File

@ -75,8 +75,6 @@
@ lr = unrecognised instruction return address
@ IRQs enabled.
ENTRY(vfp_support_entry)
local_bh_disable r1, r4
ldr r11, [r1, #TI_CPU] @ CPU number
add r10, r1, #TI_VFPSTATE @ r10 = workspace
@ -179,9 +177,12 @@ vfp_hw_state_valid:
@ else it's one 32-bit instruction, so
@ always subtract 4 from the following
@ instruction address.
local_bh_enable_ti r10, r4
ret r3 @ we think we have handled things
mov lr, r3 @ we think we have handled things
local_bh_enable_and_ret:
adr r0, .
mov r1, #SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET
b __local_bh_enable_ip @ tail call
look_for_VFP_exceptions:
@ Check for synchronous or asynchronous exception
@ -204,8 +205,7 @@ skip:
@ not recognised by VFP
DBGSTR "not VFP"
local_bh_enable_ti r10, r4
ret lr
b local_bh_enable_and_ret
process_exception:
DBGSTR "bounce"

View File

@ -32,10 +32,9 @@
/*
* Our undef handlers (in entry.S)
*/
asmlinkage void vfp_support_entry(void);
asmlinkage void vfp_null_entry(void);
asmlinkage void vfp_support_entry(u32, void *, u32, u32);
asmlinkage void (*vfp_vector)(void) = vfp_null_entry;
static bool have_vfp __ro_after_init;
/*
* Dual-use variable.
@ -645,6 +644,25 @@ static int vfp_starting_cpu(unsigned int unused)
return 0;
}
/*
* Entered with:
*
* r0 = instruction opcode (32-bit ARM or two 16-bit Thumb)
* r1 = thread_info pointer
* r2 = PC value to resume execution after successful emulation
* r3 = normal "successful" return address
* lr = unrecognised instruction return address
*/
asmlinkage void vfp_entry(u32 trigger, struct thread_info *ti, u32 resume_pc,
u32 resume_return_address)
{
if (unlikely(!have_vfp))
return;
local_bh_disable();
vfp_support_entry(trigger, ti, resume_pc, resume_return_address);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON
static int vfp_kmode_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
@ -798,7 +816,6 @@ static int __init vfp_init(void)
vfpsid = fmrx(FPSID);
barrier();
unregister_undef_hook(&vfp_detect_hook);
vfp_vector = vfp_null_entry;
pr_info("VFP support v0.3: ");
if (VFP_arch) {
@ -883,7 +900,7 @@ static int __init vfp_init(void)
"arm/vfp:starting", vfp_starting_cpu,
vfp_dying_cpu);
vfp_vector = vfp_support_entry;
have_vfp = true;
thread_register_notifier(&vfp_notifier_block);
vfp_pm_init();