perf intel-pt: Do not try to queue auxtrace data on pipe

[ Upstream commit aeb802f872 ]

When it processes AUXTRACE_INFO, it calls to auxtrace_queue_data() to
collect AUXTRACE data first.  That won't work with pipe since it needs
lseek() to read the scattered aux data.

  $ perf record -o- -e intel_pt// true | perf report -i- --itrace=i100
  # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
  #
  0x4118 [0xa0]: failed to process type: 70
  Error:
  failed to process sample

For the pipe mode, it can handle the aux data as it gets.  But there's
no guarantee it can get the aux data in time.  So the following warning
will be shown at the beginning:

  WARNING: Intel PT with pipe mode is not recommended.
           The output cannot relied upon.  In particular,
           time stamps and the order of events may be incorrect.

Fixes: dbd134322e ("perf intel-pt: Add support for decoding AUX area samples")
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230131023350.1903992-3-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Namhyung Kim 2023-01-30 18:33:48 -08:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 67f1f53cfc
commit c795162b15
3 changed files with 39 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -1813,6 +1813,36 @@ Can be compiled and traced:
$
Pipe mode
---------
Pipe mode is a problem for Intel PT and possibly other auxtrace users.
It's not recommended to use a pipe as data output with Intel PT because
of the following reason.
Essentially the auxtrace buffers do not behave like the regular perf
event buffers. That is because the head and tail are updated by
software, but in the auxtrace case the data is written by hardware.
So the head and tail do not get updated as data is written.
In the Intel PT case, the head and tail are updated only when the trace
is disabled by software, for example:
- full-trace, system wide : when buffer passes watermark
- full-trace, not system-wide : when buffer passes watermark or
context switches
- snapshot mode : as above but also when a snapshot is made
- sample mode : as above but also when a sample is made
That means finished-round ordering doesn't work. An auxtrace buffer
can turn up that has data that extends back in time, possibly to the
very beginning of tracing.
For a perf.data file, that problem is solved by going through the trace
and queuing up the auxtrace buffers in advance.
For pipe mode, the order of events and timestamps can presumably
be messed up.
EXAMPLE
-------

View file

@ -1132,6 +1132,9 @@ int auxtrace_queue_data(struct perf_session *session, bool samples, bool events)
if (auxtrace__dont_decode(session))
return 0;
if (perf_data__is_pipe(session->data))
return 0;
if (!session->auxtrace || !session->auxtrace->queue_data)
return -EINVAL;

View file

@ -4374,6 +4374,12 @@ int intel_pt_process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event,
intel_pt_setup_pebs_events(pt);
if (perf_data__is_pipe(session->data)) {
pr_warning("WARNING: Intel PT with pipe mode is not recommended.\n"
" The output cannot relied upon. In particular,\n"
" timestamps and the order of events may be incorrect.\n");
}
if (pt->sampling_mode || list_empty(&session->auxtrace_index))
err = auxtrace_queue_data(session, true, true);
else