thermal: cpu_cooling: Don't check is_cpufreq_valid()

Because get_cpu_frequency() has returned a valid frequency, it means that the
cpufreq policy is surely valid and so no point checking that again with
is_cpufreq_valid(). Get rid of the routine as well as there are no more users.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Viresh Kumar 2014-12-04 09:41:57 +05:30 committed by Eduardo Valentin
parent e1fae554fb
commit c9ca319f05

View file

@ -110,23 +110,6 @@ static void release_idr(struct idr *idr, int id)
/* Below code defines functions to be used for cpufreq as cooling device */
/**
* is_cpufreq_valid - function to check frequency transitioning capability.
* @cpu: cpu for which check is needed.
*
* This function will check the current state of the system if
* it is capable of changing the frequency for a given @cpu.
*
* Return: 0 if the system is not currently capable of changing
* the frequency of given cpu. !0 in case the frequency is changeable.
*/
static int is_cpufreq_valid(int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy policy;
return !cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
}
enum cpufreq_cooling_property {
GET_LEVEL,
GET_FREQ,
@ -300,8 +283,7 @@ static int cpufreq_apply_cooling(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_device,
cpufreq_device->cpufreq_state = cooling_state;
cpufreq_device->cpufreq_val = clip_freq;
if (is_cpufreq_valid(cpu))
cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
return 0;
}