kunit: rename print_subtest_{start,end} for clarity (s/subtest/suite)

These names sound more general than they are.

The _end() function increments a `static int kunit_suite_counter`, so it
can only safely be called on suites, aka top-level subtests.
It would need to have a separate counter for each level of subtest to be
generic enough.

So rename it to make it clear it's only appropriate for suites.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Latypov 2022-04-29 11:12:56 -07:00 committed by Shuah Khan
parent 9bf2eed995
commit cae56e1740
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ size_t kunit_suite_num_test_cases(struct kunit_suite *suite)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_num_test_cases);
static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
static void kunit_print_suite_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
{
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# Subtest: %s",
suite->name);
@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_has_succeeded);
static size_t kunit_suite_counter = 1;
static void kunit_print_subtest_end(struct kunit_suite *suite)
static void kunit_print_suite_end(struct kunit_suite *suite)
{
kunit_print_ok_not_ok((void *)suite, false,
kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite),
@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
struct kunit_result_stats suite_stats = { 0 };
struct kunit_result_stats total_stats = { 0 };
kunit_print_subtest_start(suite);
kunit_print_suite_start(suite);
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
}
kunit_print_suite_stats(suite, suite_stats, total_stats);
kunit_print_subtest_end(suite);
kunit_print_suite_end(suite);
return 0;
}