locking/selftest: Remove the bad unlock ordering test

There is no such thing as a bad unlock order.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra 2017-05-31 17:05:46 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent f5694788ad
commit cfb6133399
1 changed files with 0 additions and 29 deletions

View File

@ -515,34 +515,6 @@ GENERATE_TESTCASE(double_unlock_rsem)
#undef E
/*
* Bad unlock ordering:
*/
#define E() \
\
LOCK(A); \
LOCK(B); \
UNLOCK(A); /* fail */ \
UNLOCK(B);
/*
* 6 testcases:
*/
#include "locking-selftest-spin.h"
GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_spin)
#include "locking-selftest-wlock.h"
GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_wlock)
#include "locking-selftest-rlock.h"
GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_rlock)
#include "locking-selftest-mutex.h"
GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_mutex)
#include "locking-selftest-wsem.h"
GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_wsem)
#include "locking-selftest-rsem.h"
GENERATE_TESTCASE(bad_unlock_order_rsem)
#undef E
/*
* initializing a held lock:
*/
@ -1825,7 +1797,6 @@ void locking_selftest(void)
DO_TESTCASE_6R("A-B-C-D-B-C-D-A deadlock", ABCDBCDA);
DO_TESTCASE_6("double unlock", double_unlock);
DO_TESTCASE_6("initialize held", init_held);
DO_TESTCASE_6_SUCCESS("bad unlock order", bad_unlock_order);
printk(" --------------------------------------------------------------------------\n");
print_testname("recursive read-lock");