lib/cmdline: Fix an invalid format specifier in an assertion msg

The correct format specifier for p - n (both p and n are pointers) is
%td, as the type should be ptrdiff_t.

This was discovered by annotating KUnit assertion macros with gcc's
printf specifier, but note that gcc incorrectly suggested a %d or %ld
specifier (depending on the pointer size of the architecture being
built).

Fixes: 0ea0908311 ("lib/cmdline: Allow get_options() to take 0 to validate the input")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
David Gow 2024-02-21 17:27:15 +08:00 committed by Shuah Khan
parent 6f2f793fba
commit d2733a026f
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void cmdline_do_one_range_test(struct kunit *test, const char *in,
n, e[0], r[0]);
p = memchr_inv(&r[1], 0, sizeof(r) - sizeof(r[0]));
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, p, NULL, "in test %u at %u out of bound", n, p - r);
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, p, NULL, "in test %u at %td out of bound", n, p - r);
}
static void cmdline_test_range(struct kunit *test)