rcu: Inline rcu_start_gp_advanced() into rcu_start_future_gp()

The rcu_start_gp_advanced() is invoked only from rcu_start_future_gp() and
much of its code is redundant when invoked from that context.  This commit
therefore inlines rcu_start_gp_advanced() into rcu_start_future_gp(),
then removes rcu_start_gp_advanced().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Paul E. McKenney 2018-04-12 10:45:06 -07:00
parent a824a287f6
commit d5cd96851d

View file

@ -524,8 +524,6 @@ module_param(rcu_kick_kthreads, bool, 0644);
static ulong jiffies_till_sched_qs = HZ / 10;
module_param(jiffies_till_sched_qs, ulong, 0444);
static bool rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
struct rcu_data *rdp);
static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int (*f)(struct rcu_data *rsp));
static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp);
static int rcu_pending(void);
@ -1679,7 +1677,8 @@ static void trace_rcu_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
* rcu_node structure's ->need_future_gp field. Returns true if there
* is reason to awaken the grace-period kthread.
*
* The caller must hold the specified rcu_node structure's ->lock.
* The caller must hold the specified rcu_node structure's ->lock, which
* is why the caller is responsible for waking the grace-period kthread.
*/
static bool __maybe_unused
rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
@ -1687,7 +1686,8 @@ rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
{
unsigned long c;
bool ret = false;
struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rdp->rsp);
struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp;
struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rsp);
raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
@ -1695,7 +1695,7 @@ rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
* Pick up grace-period number for new callbacks. If this
* grace period is already marked as needed, return to the caller.
*/
c = rcu_cbs_completed(rdp->rsp, rnp);
c = rcu_cbs_completed(rsp, rnp);
trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, TPS("Startleaf"));
if (need_future_gp_element(rnp, c)) {
trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, TPS("Prestartleaf"));
@ -1727,7 +1727,7 @@ rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
* period in progress, it will be smaller than the one we obtained
* earlier. Adjust callbacks as needed.
*/
c = rcu_cbs_completed(rdp->rsp, rnp_root);
c = rcu_cbs_completed(rsp, rnp_root);
if (!rcu_is_nocb_cpu(rdp->cpu))
(void)rcu_segcblist_accelerate(&rdp->cblist, c);
@ -1748,7 +1748,12 @@ rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, TPS("Startedleafroot"));
} else {
trace_rcu_future_gp(rnp, rdp, c, TPS("Startedroot"));
ret = rcu_start_gp_advanced(rdp->rsp, rnp_root, rdp);
if (!rsp->gp_kthread)
goto unlock_out; /* No grace-period kthread yet! */
WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags, rsp->gp_flags | RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT);
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, READ_ONCE(rsp->gpnum),
TPS("newreq"));
ret = true; /* Caller must wake GP kthread. */
}
unlock_out:
if (rnp != rnp_root)
@ -2298,43 +2303,6 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
}
}
/*
* Start a new RCU grace period if warranted, re-initializing the hierarchy
* in preparation for detecting the next grace period. The caller must hold
* the root node's ->lock and hard irqs must be disabled.
*
* Note that it is legal for a dying CPU (which is marked as offline) to
* invoke this function. This can happen when the dying CPU reports its
* quiescent state.
*
* Returns true if the grace-period kthread must be awakened.
*/
static bool
rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
if (!rsp->gp_kthread || !cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) {
/*
* Either we have not yet spawned the grace-period
* task, this CPU does not need another grace period,
* or a grace period is already in progress.
* Either way, don't start a new grace period.
*/
return false;
}
WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags, RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT);
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, READ_ONCE(rsp->gpnum),
TPS("newreq"));
/*
* We can't do wakeups while holding the rnp->lock, as that
* could cause possible deadlocks with the rq->lock. Defer
* the wakeup to our caller.
*/
return true;
}
/*
* Report a full set of quiescent states to the specified rcu_state data
* structure. Invoke rcu_gp_kthread_wake() to awaken the grace-period