mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-09-28 05:12:49 +00:00
bpf: reject out-of-bounds stack pointer calculation
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Reject programs that compute wildly out-of-bounds stack pointers.
Otherwise, pointers can be computed with an offset that doesn't fit into an
`int`, causing security issues in the stack memory access check (as well as
signed integer overflow during offset addition).
This is a fix specifically for the v4.9 stable tree because the mainline
code looks very different at this point.
Fixes: 7bca0a9702
("bpf: enhance verifier to understand stack pointer arithmetic")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b5b73ea87
commit
d75d3ee237
1 changed files with 20 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -1861,10 +1861,28 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
|
|||
((BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
|
||||
regs[insn->src_reg].type == CONST_IMM) ||
|
||||
BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K)) {
|
||||
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X)
|
||||
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
|
||||
/* check in case the register contains a big
|
||||
* 64-bit value
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (regs[insn->src_reg].imm < -MAX_BPF_STACK ||
|
||||
regs[insn->src_reg].imm > MAX_BPF_STACK) {
|
||||
verbose("R%d value too big in R%d pointer arithmetic\n",
|
||||
insn->src_reg, insn->dst_reg);
|
||||
return -EACCES;
|
||||
}
|
||||
dst_reg->imm += regs[insn->src_reg].imm;
|
||||
else
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* safe against overflow: addition of 32-bit
|
||||
* numbers in 64-bit representation
|
||||
*/
|
||||
dst_reg->imm += insn->imm;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (dst_reg->imm > 0 || dst_reg->imm < -MAX_BPF_STACK) {
|
||||
verbose("R%d out-of-bounds pointer arithmetic\n",
|
||||
insn->dst_reg);
|
||||
return -EACCES;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
} else if (opcode == BPF_ADD &&
|
||||
BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue