drm/xe/display: Fix ADL-N detection

Contrary to i915, in xe ADL-N is kept as a different platform, not a
subplatform of ADL-P. Since the display side doesn't need to
differentiate between P and N, i.e. IS_ALDERLAKE_P_N() is never called,
just fixup the compat header to check for both P and N.

Moving ADL-N to be a subplatform would be more complex as the firmware
loading in xe only handles platforms, not subplatforms, as going forward
the direction is to check on IP version rather than
platforms/subplatforms.

Fix warning when initializing display:

	xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_pch_type [xe]] Found Alder Lake PCH
	------------[ cut here ]------------
	xe 0000:00:02.0: drm_WARN_ON(!((dev_priv)->info.platform == XE_ALDERLAKE_S) && !((dev_priv)->info.platform == XE_ALDERLAKE_P))

And wrong paths being taken on the display side.

Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240425181610.2704633-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6a2a90cba1)
Fixes: 44e694958b ("drm/xe/display: Implement display support")
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Lucas De Marchi 2024-04-25 11:16:09 -07:00
parent 9895736056
commit df04b152fc

View file

@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ static inline struct drm_i915_private *kdev_to_i915(struct device *kdev)
#define IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_ROCKETLAKE)
#define IS_DG1(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_DG1)
#define IS_ALDERLAKE_S(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_ALDERLAKE_S)
#define IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_ALDERLAKE_P)
#define IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) (IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_ALDERLAKE_P) || \
IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_ALDERLAKE_N))
#define IS_XEHPSDV(dev_priv) (dev_priv && 0)
#define IS_DG2(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_DG2)
#define IS_PONTEVECCHIO(dev_priv) IS_PLATFORM(dev_priv, XE_PVC)