staging: vt6656: removed the trailing statement should be on next line error

as per linux coding style trailing statments should not be there
at the end of line, instead it should be placed in next line.
hence removed that error by moving trailing statement to next
line

Signed-off-by: Nandini Hanumanthagowda <nandu.hgowda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Nandini Hanumanthagowda 2013-11-12 23:05:40 +05:30 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 819b920b7d
commit df6b85138f

View file

@ -604,7 +604,8 @@ void vRunCommand(struct work_struct *work)
}
} else if (pMgmt->eCurrState < WMAC_STATE_AUTHPENDING) {
printk("WLAN_AUTHENTICATE_WAIT:Authen Fail???\n");
} else if (pDevice->byLinkWaitCount <= 4) { //mike add:wait another 2 sec if authenticated_frame delay!
} else if (pDevice->byLinkWaitCount <= 4) {
//mike add:wait another 2 sec if authenticated_frame delay!
pDevice->byLinkWaitCount++;
printk("WLAN_AUTHENTICATE_WAIT:wait %d times!!\n", pDevice->byLinkWaitCount);
spin_unlock_irq(&pDevice->lock);
@ -639,7 +640,8 @@ void vRunCommand(struct work_struct *work)
} else if (pMgmt->eCurrState < WMAC_STATE_ASSOCPENDING) {
printk("WLAN_ASSOCIATE_WAIT:Association Fail???\n");
} else if (pDevice->byLinkWaitCount <= 4) { //mike add:wait another 2 sec if associated_frame delay!
} else if (pDevice->byLinkWaitCount <= 4) {
//mike add:wait another 2 sec if associated_frame delay!
pDevice->byLinkWaitCount++;
printk("WLAN_ASSOCIATE_WAIT:wait %d times!!\n", pDevice->byLinkWaitCount);
spin_unlock_irq(&pDevice->lock);