From e740815a97e2b6d6446792f4328378e66de166d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 01:49:16 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask() sme_active() is an x86-specific function so it's better not to call it from generic code. Christoph Hellwig mentioned that "There is no reason why we should have a special debug printk just for one specific reason why there is a requirement for a large DMA mask.", so just remove dma_check_mask(). Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806044919.10622-4-bauerman@linux.ibm.com --- kernel/dma/mapping.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/dma/mapping.c b/kernel/dma/mapping.c index 1f628e7ac709..61eeefbfcb36 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/mapping.c +++ b/kernel/dma/mapping.c @@ -291,12 +291,6 @@ void dma_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_free_attrs); -static inline void dma_check_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask) -{ - if (sme_active() && (mask < (((u64)sme_get_me_mask() << 1) - 1))) - dev_warn(dev, "SME is active, device will require DMA bounce buffers\n"); -} - int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) { const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev); @@ -327,7 +321,6 @@ int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask) return -EIO; arch_dma_set_mask(dev, mask); - dma_check_mask(dev, mask); *dev->dma_mask = mask; return 0; } @@ -345,7 +338,6 @@ int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask) if (!dma_supported(dev, mask)) return -EIO; - dma_check_mask(dev, mask); dev->coherent_dma_mask = mask; return 0; }