ring-buffer: Have ring_buffer_empty() not depend on tracing stopped

It was complained about that when the trace file is read, that the tracing
is disabled, as the iterator expects writing to the buffer it reads is not
updated. Several steps are needed to make the iterator handle a writer,
by testing if things have changed as it reads.

This step is to make ring_buffer_empty() expect the buffer to be changing.
Note if the current location of the iterator is overwritten, then it will
return false as new data is being added. Note, that this means that data
will be skipped.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200317213415.870741809@goodmis.org

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
Steven Rostedt (VMware) 2020-03-17 17:32:24 -04:00
parent ff895103a8
commit ead6ecfdde
1 changed files with 24 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -3590,16 +3590,37 @@ int ring_buffer_iter_empty(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter)
struct buffer_page *reader;
struct buffer_page *head_page;
struct buffer_page *commit_page;
struct buffer_page *curr_commit_page;
unsigned commit;
u64 curr_commit_ts;
u64 commit_ts;
cpu_buffer = iter->cpu_buffer;
/* Remember, trace recording is off when iterator is in use */
reader = cpu_buffer->reader_page;
head_page = cpu_buffer->head_page;
commit_page = cpu_buffer->commit_page;
commit = rb_page_commit(commit_page);
commit_ts = commit_page->page->time_stamp;
/*
* When the writer goes across pages, it issues a cmpxchg which
* is a mb(), which will synchronize with the rmb here.
* (see rb_tail_page_update())
*/
smp_rmb();
commit = rb_page_commit(commit_page);
/* We want to make sure that the commit page doesn't change */
smp_rmb();
/* Make sure commit page didn't change */
curr_commit_page = READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->commit_page);
curr_commit_ts = READ_ONCE(curr_commit_page->page->time_stamp);
/* If the commit page changed, then there's more data */
if (curr_commit_page != commit_page ||
curr_commit_ts != commit_ts)
return 0;
/* Still racy, as it may return a false positive, but that's OK */
return ((iter->head_page == commit_page && iter->head == commit) ||
(iter->head_page == reader && commit_page == head_page &&
head_page->read == commit &&