Bluetooth: mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

In this particular case, notice that I replaced the
"deliberate fall-through..." comment with a "fall through"
comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo A. R. Silva 2017-10-12 17:24:02 -05:00 committed by Marcel Holtmann
parent 2d13e34749
commit fac72b243c
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static void bcm203x_complete(struct urb *urb)
}
data->state = BCM203X_LOAD_FIRMWARE;
/* fall through */
case BCM203X_LOAD_FIRMWARE:
if (data->fw_sent == data->fw_size) {
usb_fill_int_urb(urb, udev, usb_rcvintpipe(udev, BCM203X_IN_EP),

View File

@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_wakeup(struct hci_uart *hu)
* perfectly safe to always send one.
*/
BT_DBG("dual wake-up-indication");
/* deliberate fall-through - do not add break */
/* fall through */
case HCILL_ASLEEP:
/* acknowledge device wake up */
if (send_hcill_cmd(HCILL_WAKE_UP_ACK, hu) < 0) {