libbpf: use negative fd to specify missing BTF

0 is a valid FD, so it's better to initialize it to -1, as is done in
other places. Also, technically, BTF type ID 0 is valid (it's a VOID
type), so it's more reliable to check btf_fd, instead of
btf_key_type_id, to determine if there is any BTF associated with a map.

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
This commit is contained in:
Andrii Nakryiko 2019-05-29 10:36:08 -07:00 committed by Daniel Borkmann
parent f102154d31
commit fba01a0689
1 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -1751,7 +1751,7 @@ bpf_object__create_maps(struct bpf_object *obj)
create_attr.key_size = def->key_size;
create_attr.value_size = def->value_size;
create_attr.max_entries = def->max_entries;
create_attr.btf_fd = 0;
create_attr.btf_fd = -1;
create_attr.btf_key_type_id = 0;
create_attr.btf_value_type_id = 0;
if (bpf_map_type__is_map_in_map(def->type) &&
@ -1765,11 +1765,11 @@ bpf_object__create_maps(struct bpf_object *obj)
}
*pfd = bpf_create_map_xattr(&create_attr);
if (*pfd < 0 && create_attr.btf_key_type_id) {
if (*pfd < 0 && create_attr.btf_fd >= 0) {
cp = libbpf_strerror_r(errno, errmsg, sizeof(errmsg));
pr_warning("Error in bpf_create_map_xattr(%s):%s(%d). Retrying without BTF.\n",
map->name, cp, errno);
create_attr.btf_fd = 0;
create_attr.btf_fd = -1;
create_attr.btf_key_type_id = 0;
create_attr.btf_value_type_id = 0;
map->btf_key_type_id = 0;
@ -2053,6 +2053,9 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt,
char *log_buf;
int ret;
if (!insns || !insns_cnt)
return -EINVAL;
memset(&load_attr, 0, sizeof(struct bpf_load_program_attr));
load_attr.prog_type = prog->type;
load_attr.expected_attach_type = prog->expected_attach_type;
@ -2063,7 +2066,7 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt,
load_attr.license = license;
load_attr.kern_version = kern_version;
load_attr.prog_ifindex = prog->prog_ifindex;
load_attr.prog_btf_fd = prog->btf_fd >= 0 ? prog->btf_fd : 0;
load_attr.prog_btf_fd = prog->btf_fd;
load_attr.func_info = prog->func_info;
load_attr.func_info_rec_size = prog->func_info_rec_size;
load_attr.func_info_cnt = prog->func_info_cnt;
@ -2072,8 +2075,6 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt,
load_attr.line_info_cnt = prog->line_info_cnt;
load_attr.log_level = prog->log_level;
load_attr.prog_flags = prog->prog_flags;
if (!load_attr.insns || !load_attr.insns_cnt)
return -EINVAL;
retry_load:
log_buf = malloc(log_buf_size);