perf test: Add test case for PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR

Extend sample-parsing test cases to support new sample type
PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1504026672-7304-6-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kan Liang 2017-08-29 13:11:12 -04:00 committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
parent 49d58f04eb
commit fc33dccba3

View file

@ -141,6 +141,9 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
}
}
if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR)
COMP(phys_addr);
return true;
}
@ -206,6 +209,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
.mask = sample_regs,
.regs = regs,
},
.phys_addr = 113,
};
struct sample_read_value values[] = {{1, 5}, {9, 3}, {2, 7}, {6, 4},};
struct perf_sample sample_out;
@ -305,7 +309,7 @@ int test__sample_parsing(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
* were added. Please actually update the test rather than just change
* the condition below.
*/
if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR << 1) {
if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR << 1) {
pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n");
return -1;
}