commit 0c0b4a49d3 upstream.
Syzbot reports a warning as follows:
============================================
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5075 at fs/mbcache.c:419 mb_cache_destroy+0x224/0x290
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 5075 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-gb947cc5bf6d7
RIP: 0010:mb_cache_destroy+0x224/0x290 fs/mbcache.c:419
Call Trace:
<TASK>
ext4_put_super+0x6d4/0xcd0 fs/ext4/super.c:1375
generic_shutdown_super+0x136/0x2d0 fs/super.c:641
kill_block_super+0x44/0x90 fs/super.c:1675
ext4_kill_sb+0x68/0xa0 fs/ext4/super.c:7327
[...]
============================================
This is because when finding an entry in ext4_xattr_block_cache_find(), if
ext4_sb_bread() returns -ENOMEM, the ce's e_refcnt, which has already grown
in the __entry_find(), won't be put away, and eventually trigger the above
issue in mb_cache_destroy() due to reference count leakage.
So call mb_cache_entry_put() on the -ENOMEM error branch as a quick fix.
Reported-by: syzbot+dd43bd0f7474512edc47@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=dd43bd0f7474512edc47
Fixes: fb265c9cb4 ("ext4: add ext4_sb_bread() to disambiguate ENOMEM cases")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240504075526.2254349-2-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 9a9f3a9842 upstream.
Now ac_groups_linear_remaining is of type __u16 and s_mb_max_linear_groups
is of type unsigned int, so an overflow occurs when setting a value above
65535 through the mb_max_linear_groups sysfs interface. Therefore, the
type of ac_groups_linear_remaining is set to __u32 to avoid overflow.
Fixes: 196e402adf ("ext4: improve cr 0 / cr 1 group scanning")
CC: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240319113325.3110393-8-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 3f4830abd2 ]
Smatch complains "err" can be uninitialized in the caller.
fs/ext4/indirect.c:349 ext4_alloc_branch()
error: uninitialized symbol 'err'.
Set the error to zero on the success path.
Fixes: 8016e29f43 ("ext4: fast commit recovery path")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/363a4673-0fb8-4adf-b4fb-90a499077276@moroto.mountain
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 19a043bb1f ]
ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple ignores the group before goal, so it will fail
if free blocks reside in group before goal. Try all groups to avoid
unexpected failure.
Search finishes either if any free block is found or if no available
blocks are found. Simpliy check "i >= max" to distinguish the above
cases.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-8-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 3f4830abd2 ("ext4: fix potential unnitialized variable")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 497885f72d ]
The "i" returned from mb_find_next_zero_bit is in cluster unit and we
need offset "block" corresponding to "i" in block unit. Convert "i" to
block unit to fix the unit mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230603150327.3596033-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 3f4830abd2 ("ext4: fix potential unnitialized variable")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 253cacb0de ]
We try to allocate a block from goal in ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple. We
only need get blkoff in first group with goal and set blkoff to 0 for
the rest groups.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-21-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 3f4830abd2 ("ext4: fix potential unnitialized variable")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 35a1f12f0c ]
A user with minimum journal size (1024 blocks these days) complained
about the following error triggered by generic/697 test in
ext4_tmpfile():
run fstests generic/697 at 2024-02-28 05:34:46
JBD2: vfstest wants too many credits credits:260 rsv_credits:0 max:256
EXT4-fs error (device loop0) in __ext4_new_inode:1083: error 28
Indeed the credit estimate in ext4_tmpfile() is huge.
EXT4_MAXQUOTAS_INIT_BLOCKS() is 219, then 10 credits from ext4_tmpfile()
itself and then ext4_xattr_credits_for_new_inode() adds more credits
needed for security attributes and ACLs. Now the
EXT4_MAXQUOTAS_INIT_BLOCKS() is in fact unnecessary because we've
already initialized quotas with dquot_init() shortly before and so
EXT4_MAXQUOTAS_TRANS_BLOCKS() is enough (which boils down to 3 credits).
Fixes: af51a2ac36 ("ext4: ->tmpfile() support")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240307115320.28949-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d8b945fa47 ]
There's issue as follows When do IO fault injection test:
Quota error (device dm-3): find_block_dqentry: Quota for id 101 referenced but not present
Quota error (device dm-3): qtree_read_dquot: Can't read quota structure for id 101
Quota error (device dm-3): do_check_range: Getting block 2021161007 out of range 1-186
Quota error (device dm-3): qtree_read_dquot: Can't read quota structure for id 661
Now, ext4_write_dquot()/ext4_acquire_dquot()/ext4_release_dquot() may commit
inconsistent quota data even if process failed. This may lead to filesystem
corruption.
To ensure filesystem consistent when errors=remount-ro there is need to call
ext4_handle_error() to abort journal.
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240119062908.3598806-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 68ee261fb1 ]
If one group is marked as block bitmap corrupted, its free blocks cannot
be used and its free count is also deducted from the global
sbi->s_freeclusters_counter. User might be confused about the absent
free space because we can't query the information about corrupted block
groups except unreliable error messages in syslog. So add a hint to show
block bitmap corrupted groups in mb_groups.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240119061154.1525781-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 124e7c61de ]
ext4_abort will eventually call ext4_errno_to_code, which translates the
errno to an EXT4_ERR specific error. This means that ext4_abort expects
an errno. By using EXT4_ERR_ here, it gets misinterpreted (as an errno),
and ends up saving EXT4_ERR_EBUSY on the superblock during an abort,
which makes no sense.
ESHUTDOWN will get properly translated to EXT4_ERR_SHUTDOWN, so use that
instead.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026173302.84000-1-krisman@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
[ Upstream commit 9a089b21f7 ]
Send a FS_ERROR message via fsnotify to a userspace monitoring tool
whenever a ext4 error condition is triggered. This follows the existing
error conditions in ext4, so it is hooked to the ext4_error* functions.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211025192746.66445-30-krisman@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
[ Upstream commit a6b3bfe176 ]
We observed a corruption during on-line resize of a file system that is
larger than 16 TiB with 4k block size. With having more then 2^32 blocks
resize_inode is turned off by default by mke2fs. The issue can be
reproduced on a smaller file system for convenience by explicitly
turning off resize_inode. An on-line resize across an 8 GiB boundary (the
size of a meta block group in this setup) then leads to a corruption:
dev=/dev/<some_dev> # should be >= 16 GiB
mkdir -p /corruption
/sbin/mke2fs -t ext4 -b 4096 -O ^resize_inode $dev $((2 * 2**21 - 2**15))
mount -t ext4 $dev /corruption
dd if=/dev/zero bs=4096 of=/corruption/test count=$((2*2**21 - 4*2**15))
sha1sum /corruption/test
# 79d2658b39dcfd77274e435b0934028adafaab11 /corruption/test
/sbin/resize2fs $dev $((2*2**21))
# drop page cache to force reload the block from disk
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
sha1sum /corruption/test
# 3c2abc63cbf1a94c9e6977e0fbd72cd832c4d5c3 /corruption/test
2^21 = 2^15*2^6 equals 8 GiB whereof 2^15 is the number of blocks per
block group and 2^6 are the number of block groups that make a meta
block group.
The last checksum might be different depending on how the file is laid
out across the physical blocks. The actual corruption occurs at physical
block 63*2^15 = 2064384 which would be the location of the backup of the
meta block group's block descriptor. During the on-line resize the file
system will be converted to meta_bg starting at s_first_meta_bg which is
2 in the example - meaning all block groups after 16 GiB. However, in
ext4_flex_group_add we might add block groups that are not part of the
first meta block group yet. In the reproducer we achieved this by
substracting the size of a whole block group from the point where the
meta block group would start. This must be considered when updating the
backup block group descriptors to follow the non-meta_bg layout. The fix
is to add a test whether the group to add is already part of the meta
block group or not.
Fixes: 01f795f9e0 ("ext4: add online resizing support for meta_bg and 64-bit file systems")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@amazon.de>
Tested-by: Srivathsa Dara <srivathsa.d.dara@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Srivathsa Dara <srivathsa.d.dara@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240215155009.94493-1-mheyne@amazon.de
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4fbf8bc733 ]
When yangerkun review commit 93cdf49f6e ("ext4: Fix best extent lstart
adjustment logic in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa()"), it was found that the best
extent did not completely cover the original request after adjusting the
best extent lstart in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa() as follows:
original request: 2/10(8)
normalized request: 0/64(64)
best extent: 0/9(9)
When we check if best ex can be kept at start of goal, ac_o_ex.fe_logical
is 2 less than the adjusted best extent logical end 9, so we think the
adjustment is done. But obviously 0/9(9) doesn't cover 2/10(8), so we
should determine here if the original request logical end is less than or
equal to the adjusted best extent logical end.
In addition, add a comment stating when adjusted best_ex will not cover
the original request, and remove the duplicate assertion because adjusting
lstart makes no change to b_ex.fe_len.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3630fa7f-b432-7afd-5f79-781bc3b2c5ea@huawei.com
Fixes: 93cdf49f6e ("ext4: Fix best extent lstart adjustment logic in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa()")
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240201141845.1879253-1-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 2331fd4a49 upstream.
After updating bb_free in mb_free_blocks, it is possible to return without
updating bb_fragments because the block being freed is found to have
already been freed, which leads to inconsistency between bb_free and
bb_fragments.
Since the group may be unlocked in ext4_grp_locked_error(), this can lead
to problems such as dividing by zero when calculating the average fragment
length. Hence move the update of bb_free to after the block double-free
check guarantees that the corresponding statistics are updated only after
the core block bitmap is modified.
Fixes: eabe0444df ("ext4: speed-up releasing blocks on commit")
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-5-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit c9b528c357 upstream.
This mostly reverts commit 6bd97bf273 ("ext4: remove redundant
mb_regenerate_buddy()") and reintroduces mb_regenerate_buddy(). Based on
code in mb_free_blocks(), fast commit replay can end up marking as free
blocks that are already marked as such. This causes corruption of the
buddy bitmap so we need to regenerate it in that case.
Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Fixes: 6bd97bf273 ("ext4: remove redundant mb_regenerate_buddy()")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-4-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 6430dea07e ]
In ext4_map_blocks(), if we can't find a range of mapping in the
extents cache, we are calling ext4_ext_map_blocks() to search the real
path and ext4_ext_determine_hole() to determine the hole range. But if
the querying range was partially or completely overlaped by a delalloc
extent, we can't find it in the real extent path, so the returned hole
length could be incorrect.
Fortunately, ext4_ext_put_gap_in_cache() have already handle delalloc
extent, but it searches start from the expanded hole_start, doesn't
start from the querying range, so the delalloc extent found could not be
the one that overlaped the querying range, plus, it also didn't adjust
the hole length. Let's just remove ext4_ext_put_gap_in_cache(), handle
delalloc and insert adjusted hole extent in ext4_ext_determine_hole().
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240127015825.1608160-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 832698373a ]
Places the logic for checking if the group's block bitmap is corrupt under
the protection of the group lock to avoid allocating blocks from the group
with a corrupted block bitmap.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-8-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4530b3660d ]
Determine if the group block bitmap is corrupted before using ac_b_ex in
ext4_mb_try_best_found() to avoid allocating blocks from a group with a
corrupted block bitmap in the following concurrency and making the
situation worse.
ext4_mb_regular_allocator
ext4_lock_group(sb, group)
ext4_mb_good_group
// check if the group bbitmap is corrupted
ext4_mb_complex_scan_group
// Scan group gets ac_b_ex but doesn't use it
ext4_unlock_group(sb, group)
ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(group)
// The block bitmap was corrupted during
// the group unlock gap.
ext4_mb_try_best_found
ext4_lock_group(ac->ac_sb, group)
ext4_mb_use_best_found
mb_mark_used
// Allocating blocks in block bitmap corrupted group
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-7-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 993bf0f4c3 ]
Determine if bb_fragments is 0 instead of determining bb_free to eliminate
the risk of dividing by zero when the block bitmap is corrupted.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-6-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 55583e899a upstream.
In ext4_move_extents(), moved_len is only updated when all moves are
successfully executed, and only discards orig_inode and donor_inode
preallocations when moved_len is not zero. When the loop fails to exit
after successfully moving some extents, moved_len is not updated and
remains at 0, so it does not discard the preallocations.
If the moved extents overlap with the preallocated extents, the
overlapped extents are freed twice in ext4_mb_release_inode_pa() and
ext4_process_freed_data() (as described in commit 94d7c16cbb ("ext4:
Fix double-free of blocks with EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT")), and bb_free is
incremented twice. Hence when trim is executed, a zero-division bug is
triggered in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() because bb_free is not zero
and bb_fragments is zero.
Therefore, update move_len after each extent move to avoid the issue.
Reported-by: Wei Chen <harperchen1110@gmail.com>
Reported-by: xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAO4mrferzqBUnCag8R3m2zf897ts9UEuhjFQGPtODT92rYyR2Q@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: fcf6b1b729 ("ext4: refactor ext4_move_extents code base")
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-2-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 5d1935ac02 ]
When we online resize an ext4 filesystem with a oversized flexbg_size,
mkfs.ext4 -F -G 67108864 $dev -b 4096 100M
mount $dev $dir
resize2fs $dev 16G
the following WARN_ON is triggered:
==================================================================
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 427 at mm/page_alloc.c:4402 __alloc_pages+0x411/0x550
Modules linked in: sg(E)
CPU: 0 PID: 427 Comm: resize2fs Tainted: G E 6.6.0-rc5+ #314
RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages+0x411/0x550
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__kmalloc_large_node+0xa2/0x200
__kmalloc+0x16e/0x290
ext4_resize_fs+0x481/0xd80
__ext4_ioctl+0x1616/0x1d90
ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20
__x64_sys_ioctl+0xf0/0x150
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
==================================================================
This is because flexbg_size is too large and the size of the new_group_data
array to be allocated exceeds MAX_ORDER. Currently, the minimum value of
MAX_ORDER is 8, the minimum value of PAGE_SIZE is 4096, the corresponding
maximum number of groups that can be allocated is:
(PAGE_SIZE << MAX_ORDER) / sizeof(struct ext4_new_group_data) ≈ 21845
And the value that is down-aligned to the power of 2 is 16384. Therefore,
this value is defined as MAX_RESIZE_BG, and the number of groups added
each time does not exceed this value during resizing, and is added multiple
times to complete the online resizing. The difference is that the metadata
in a flex_bg may be more dispersed.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023013057.2117948-4-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b099eb87de ]
In commit 967ac8af44 ("ext4: fix potential integer overflow in
alloc_flex_gd()"), an overflow check is added to alloc_flex_gd() to
prevent the allocated memory from being smaller than expected due to
the overflow. However, after kmalloc() is replaced with kmalloc_array()
in commit 6da2ec5605 ("treewide: kmalloc() -> kmalloc_array()"), the
kmalloc_array() function has an overflow check, so the above problem
will not occur. Therefore, the extra check is removed.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023013057.2117948-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 658a52344f ]
The maximum value of flexbg_size is 2^31, but the maximum value of int
is (2^31 - 1), so overflow may occur when the type of flexbg_size is
declared as int.
For example, when uninit_mask is initialized in ext4_alloc_group_tables(),
if flexbg_size == 2^31, the initialized uninit_mask is incorrect, and this
may causes set_flexbg_block_bitmap() to trigger a BUG_ON().
Therefore, the flexbg_size type is declared as unsigned int to avoid
overflow and memory waste.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023013057.2117948-2-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 68da4c44b9 ]
Suppose we issue two FITRIM ioctls for ranges [0,15] and [16,31] with
mininum length of trimmed range set to 8 blocks. If we have say a range of
blocks 10-22 free, this range will not be trimmed because it straddles the
boundary of the two FITRIM ranges and neither part is big enough. This is a
bit surprising to some users that call FITRIM on smaller ranges of blocks
to limit impact on the system. Also XFS trims all free space extents that
overlap with the specified range so we are inconsistent among filesystems.
Let's change ext4_try_to_trim_range() to consider for trimming the whole
free space extent that straddles the end of specified range, not just the
part of it within the range.
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231216010919.1995851-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 7c784d6248 upstream.
The ext4 filesystem tracks the trim status of blocks at the group
level. When an entire group has been trimmed then it is marked as
such and subsequent trim invocations with the same minimum trim size
will not be attempted on that group unless it is marked as able to be
trimmed again such as when a block is freed.
Currently the last group can't be marked as trimmed due to incorrect
logic in ext4_last_grp_cluster(). ext4_last_grp_cluster() is supposed
to return the zero based index of the last cluster in a group. This is
then used by ext4_try_to_trim_range() to determine if the trim
operation spans the entire group and as such if the trim status of the
group should be recorded.
ext4_last_grp_cluster() takes a 0 based group index, thus the valid
values for grp are 0..(ext4_get_groups_count - 1). Any group index
less than (ext4_get_groups_count - 1) is not the last group and must
have EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb) clusters. For the last group we need
to calculate the number of clusters based on the number of blocks in
the group. Finally subtract 1 from the number of clusters as zero
based indexing is expected. Rearrange the function slightly to make
it clear what we are calculating and returning.
Reproducer:
// Create file system where the last group has fewer blocks than
// blocks per group
$ mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 -g 8192 /dev/nvme0n1 8191
$ mount /dev/nvme0n1 /mnt
Before Patch:
$ fstrim -v /mnt
/mnt: 25.9 MiB (27156480 bytes) trimmed
// Group not marked as trimmed so second invocation still discards blocks
$ fstrim -v /mnt
/mnt: 25.9 MiB (27156480 bytes) trimmed
After Patch:
fstrim -v /mnt
/mnt: 25.9 MiB (27156480 bytes) trimmed
// Group marked as trimmed so second invocation DOESN'T discard any blocks
fstrim -v /mnt
/mnt: 0 B (0 bytes) trimmed
Fixes: 45e4ab320c ("ext4: move setting of trimmed bit into ext4_try_to_trim_range()")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213051635.37731-1-surajjs@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2dcf5fde6d upstream.
For files with logical blocks close to EXT_MAX_BLOCKS, the file size
predicted in ext4_mb_normalize_request() may exceed EXT_MAX_BLOCKS.
This can cause some blocks to be preallocated that will not be used.
And after [Fixes], the following issue may be triggered:
=========================================================
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:4653!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
CPU: 1 PID: 2357 Comm: xfs_io 6.7.0-rc2-00195-g0f5cc96c367f
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
pc : ext4_mb_use_inode_pa+0x148/0x208
lr : ext4_mb_use_inode_pa+0x98/0x208
Call trace:
ext4_mb_use_inode_pa+0x148/0x208
ext4_mb_new_inode_pa+0x240/0x4a8
ext4_mb_use_best_found+0x1d4/0x208
ext4_mb_try_best_found+0xc8/0x110
ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x11c/0xf48
ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x790/0xaa8
ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x7cc/0xd20
ext4_map_blocks+0x170/0x600
ext4_iomap_begin+0x1c0/0x348
=========================================================
Here is a calculation when adjusting ac_b_ex in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa():
ex.fe_logical = orig_goal_end - EXT4_C2B(sbi, ex.fe_len);
if (ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= ex.fe_logical)
goto adjust_bex;
The problem is that when orig_goal_end is subtracted from ac_b_ex.fe_len
it is still greater than EXT_MAX_BLOCKS, which causes ex.fe_logical to
overflow to a very small value, which ultimately triggers a BUG_ON in
ext4_mb_new_inode_pa() because pa->pa_free < len.
The last logical block of an actual write request does not exceed
EXT_MAX_BLOCKS, so in ext4_mb_normalize_request() also avoids normalizing
the last logical block to exceed EXT_MAX_BLOCKS to avoid the above issue.
The test case in [Link] can reproduce the above issue with 64k block size.
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/fstests/list/?series=804003
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # 6.4
Fixes: 93cdf49f6e ("ext4: Fix best extent lstart adjustment logic in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa()")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231127063313.3734294-1-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 8e387c89e9 ]
__insert_pending() allocate memory in atomic context, so the allocation
could fail, but we are not handling that failure now. It could lead
ext4_es_remove_extent() to get wrong reserved clusters, and the global
data blocks reservation count will be incorrect. The same to
extents_status entry preallocation, preallocate pending entry out of the
i_es_lock with __GFP_NOFAIL, make sure __insert_pending() and
__revise_pending() always succeeds.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230824092619.1327976-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 768d612f79 ]
Yikebaer reported an issue:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ext4_es_insert_extent+0xc68/0xcb0
fs/ext4/extents_status.c:894
Read of size 4 at addr ffff888112ecc1a4 by task syz-executor/8438
CPU: 1 PID: 8438 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.5.0-rc5 #1
Call Trace:
[...]
kasan_report+0xba/0xf0 mm/kasan/report.c:588
ext4_es_insert_extent+0xc68/0xcb0 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:894
ext4_map_blocks+0x92a/0x16f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:680
ext4_alloc_file_blocks.isra.0+0x2df/0xb70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4462
ext4_zero_range fs/ext4/extents.c:4622 [inline]
ext4_fallocate+0x251c/0x3ce0 fs/ext4/extents.c:4721
[...]
Allocated by task 8438:
[...]
kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:693 [inline]
__es_alloc_extent fs/ext4/extents_status.c:469 [inline]
ext4_es_insert_extent+0x672/0xcb0 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:873
ext4_map_blocks+0x92a/0x16f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:680
ext4_alloc_file_blocks.isra.0+0x2df/0xb70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4462
ext4_zero_range fs/ext4/extents.c:4622 [inline]
ext4_fallocate+0x251c/0x3ce0 fs/ext4/extents.c:4721
[...]
Freed by task 8438:
[...]
kmem_cache_free+0xec/0x490 mm/slub.c:3823
ext4_es_try_to_merge_right fs/ext4/extents_status.c:593 [inline]
__es_insert_extent+0x9f4/0x1440 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:802
ext4_es_insert_extent+0x2ca/0xcb0 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:882
ext4_map_blocks+0x92a/0x16f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:680
ext4_alloc_file_blocks.isra.0+0x2df/0xb70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4462
ext4_zero_range fs/ext4/extents.c:4622 [inline]
ext4_fallocate+0x251c/0x3ce0 fs/ext4/extents.c:4721
[...]
==================================================================
The flow of issue triggering is as follows:
1. remove es
raw es es removed es1
|-------------------| -> |----|.......|------|
2. insert es
es insert es1 merge with es es1 merge with es and free es1
|----|.......|------| -> |------------|------| -> |-------------------|
es merges with newes, then merges with es1, frees es1, then determines
if es1->es_len is 0 and triggers a UAF.
The code flow is as follows:
ext4_es_insert_extent
es1 = __es_alloc_extent(true);
es2 = __es_alloc_extent(true);
__es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, end, NULL, es1)
__es_insert_extent(inode, &newes, es1) ---> insert es1 to es tree
__es_insert_extent(inode, &newes, es2)
ext4_es_try_to_merge_right
ext4_es_free_extent(inode, es1) ---> es1 is freed
if (es1 && !es1->es_len)
// Trigger UAF by determining if es1 is used.
We determine whether es1 or es2 is used immediately after calling
__es_remove_extent() or __es_insert_extent() to avoid triggering a
UAF if es1 or es2 is freed.
Reported-by: Yikebaer Aizezi <yikebaer61@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALcu4raD4h9coiyEBL4Bm0zjDwxC2CyPiTwsP3zFuhot6y9Beg@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: 2a69c45008 ("ext4: using nofail preallocation in ext4_es_insert_extent()")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230815070808.3377171-1-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 8e387c89e9 ("ext4: make sure allocate pending entry not fail")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2a69c45008 ]
Similar to in ext4_es_insert_delayed_block(), we use preallocations that
do not fail to avoid inconsistencies, but we do not care about es that are
not must be kept, and we return 0 even if such es memory allocation fails.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-9-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 8e387c89e9 ("ext4: make sure allocate pending entry not fail")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4a2d98447b ]
Similar to in ext4_es_remove_extent(), we use a no-fail preallocation
to avoid inconsistencies, except that here we may have to preallocate
two extent_status.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-8-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 8e387c89e9 ("ext4: make sure allocate pending entry not fail")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e9fe2b882b ]
If __es_remove_extent() returns an error it means that when splitting
extent, allocating an extent that must be kept failed, where returning
an error directly would cause the extent tree to be inconsistent. So we
use GFP_NOFAIL to pre-allocate an extent_status and pass it to
__es_remove_extent() to avoid this problem.
In addition, since the allocated memory is outside the i_es_lock, the
extent_status tree may change and the pre-allocated extent_status is
no longer needed, so we release the pre-allocated extent_status when
es->es_len is not initialized.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-7-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 8e387c89e9 ("ext4: make sure allocate pending entry not fail")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit bda3efaf77 ]
When splitting extent, if the second extent can not be dropped, we return
-ENOMEM and use GFP_NOFAIL to preallocate an extent_status outside of
i_es_lock and pass it to __es_remove_extent() to be used as the second
extent. This ensures that __es_remove_extent() is executed successfully,
thus ensuring consistency in the extent status tree. If the second extent
is not undroppable, we simply drop it and return 0. Then retry is no longer
necessary, remove it.
Now, __es_remove_extent() will always remove what it should, maybe more.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-6-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 8e387c89e9 ("ext4: make sure allocate pending entry not fail")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 95f0b32033 ]
Pass a extent_status pointer prealloc to __es_insert_extent(). If the
pointer is non-null, it is used directly when a new extent_status is
needed to avoid memory allocation failures.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-5-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 8e387c89e9 ("ext4: make sure allocate pending entry not fail")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 73a2f03365 ]
Factor out __es_alloc_extent() and __es_free_extent(), which only allocate
and free extent_status in these two helpers.
The ext4_es_alloc_extent() function is split into __es_alloc_extent()
and ext4_es_init_extent(). In __es_alloc_extent() we allocate memory using
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL | __GFP_ZERO if the memory allocation cannot
fail, otherwise we use GFP_ATOMIC. and the ext4_es_init_extent() is used to
initialize extent_status and update related variables after a successful
allocation.
This is to prepare for the use of pre-allocated extent_status later.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-4-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 8e387c89e9 ("ext4: make sure allocate pending entry not fail")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9649eb18c6 ]
In the extent status tree, we have extents which we can just drop without
issues and extents we must not drop - this depends on the extent's status
- currently ext4_es_is_delayed() extents must stay, others may be dropped.
A helper function is added to help determine if the current extent can
be dropped, although only ext4_es_is_delayed() extents cannot be dropped
currently.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 8e387c89e9 ("ext4: make sure allocate pending entry not fail")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 40dd7953f4 upstream.
Wrong check of gdb backup in meta bg as following:
first_group is the first group of meta_bg which contains target group, so
target group is always >= first_group. We check if target group has gdb
backup by comparing first_group with [group + 1] and [group +
EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb) - 1]. As group >= first_group, then [group + N] is
> first_group. So no copy of gdb backup in meta bg is done in
setup_new_flex_group_blocks.
No need to do gdb backup copy in meta bg from setup_new_flex_group_blocks
as we always copy updated gdb block to backups at end of
ext4_flex_group_add as following:
ext4_flex_group_add
/* no gdb backup copy for meta bg any more */
setup_new_flex_group_blocks
/* update current group number */
ext4_update_super
sbi->s_groups_count += flex_gd->count;
/*
* if group in meta bg contains backup is added, the primary gdb block
* of the meta bg will be copy to backup in new added group here.
*/
for (; gdb_num <= gdb_num_end; gdb_num++)
update_backups(...)
In summary, we can remove wrong gdb backup copy code in
setup_new_flex_group_blocks.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230826174712.4059355-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 40ea98396a upstream.
When big allocate feature is enabled, we need to count and update
reserved clusters before removing a delayed only extent_status entry.
{init|count|get}_rsvd() have already done this, but the start block
number of this counting isn't correct in the following case.
lblk end
| |
v v
-------------------------
| | orig_es
-------------------------
^ ^
len1 is 0 | len2 |
If the start block of the orig_es entry founded is bigger than lblk, we
passed lblk as start block to count_rsvd(), but the length is correct,
finally, the range to be counted is offset. This patch fix this by
passing the start blocks to 'orig_es->lblk + len1'.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230824092619.1327976-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 31f13421c0 upstream.
Commit 0aeaa2559d ("ext4: fix corruption when online resizing a 1K
bigalloc fs") found that primary superblock's offset in its group is
not equal to offset of backup superblock in its group when block size
is 1K and bigalloc is enabled. As group descriptor blocks are right
after superblock, we can't pass block number of gdb to update_backups
for the same reason.
The root casue of the issue above is that leading 1K padding block is
count as data block offset for primary block while backup block has no
padding block offset in its group.
Remove padding data block count to fix the issue for gdb backups.
For meta_bg case, update_backups treat blk_off as block number, do no
conversion in this case.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230826174712.4059355-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit bedc5d3463 upstream.
Let's say we want to allocate 2 blocks starting from 4294966386, after
predicting the file size, start is aligned to 4294965248, len is changed
to 2048, then end = start + size = 0x100000000. Since end is of
type ext4_lblk_t, i.e. uint, end is truncated to 0.
This causes (pa->pa_lstart >= end) to always hold when checking if the
current extent to be allocated crosses already preallocated blocks, so the
resulting ac_g_ex may cross already preallocated blocks. Hence we convert
the end type to loff_t and use pa_logical_end() to avoid overflow.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230724121059.11834-4-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit bc056e7163 upstream.
When we calculate the end position of ext4_free_extent, this position may
be exactly where ext4_lblk_t (i.e. uint) overflows. For example, if
ac_g_ex.fe_logical is 4294965248 and ac_orig_goal_len is 2048, then the
computed end is 0x100000000, which is 0. If ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical is not
the first case of adjusting the best extent, that is, new_bex_end > 0, the
following BUG_ON will be triggered:
=========================================================
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:5116!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 3 PID: 673 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G E 6.5.0-rc1+ #279
RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_new_inode_pa+0xc5/0x430
Call Trace:
<TASK>
ext4_mb_use_best_found+0x203/0x2f0
ext4_mb_try_best_found+0x163/0x240
ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x158/0x1550
ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x86a/0xe10
ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xb0c/0x13a0
ext4_map_blocks+0x2cd/0x8f0
ext4_iomap_begin+0x27b/0x400
iomap_iter+0x222/0x3d0
__iomap_dio_rw+0x243/0xcb0
iomap_dio_rw+0x16/0x80
=========================================================
A simple reproducer demonstrating the problem:
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sda -b 4096 100M
mount /dev/sda /tmp/test
fallocate -l1M /tmp/test/tmp
fallocate -l10M /tmp/test/file
fallocate -i -o 1M -l16777203M /tmp/test/file
fsstress -d /tmp/test -l 0 -n 100000 -p 8 &
sleep 10 && killall -9 fsstress
rm -f /tmp/test/tmp
xfs_io -c "open -ad /tmp/test/file" -c "pwrite -S 0xff 0 8192"
We simply refactor the logic for adjusting the best extent by adding
a temporary ext4_free_extent ex and use extent_logical_end() to avoid
overflow, which also simplifies the code.
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 6.4
Fixes: 93cdf49f6e ("ext4: Fix best extent lstart adjustment logic in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa()")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230724121059.11834-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 43bbddc067 upstream.
When we use lstart + len to calculate the end of free extent or prealloc
space, it may exceed the maximum value of 4294967295(0xffffffff) supported
by ext4_lblk_t and cause overflow, which may lead to various problems.
Therefore, we add two helper functions, extent_logical_end() and
pa_logical_end(), to limit the type of end to loff_t, and also convert
lstart to loff_t for calculation to avoid overflow.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230724121059.11834-2-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 5229a658f6 ]
Len Brown has reported that system suspend sometimes fail due to
inability to freeze a task working in ext4_trim_fs() for one minute.
Trimming a large filesystem on a disk that slowly processes discard
requests can indeed take a long time. Since discard is just an advisory
call, it is perfectly fine to interrupt it at any time and the return
number of discarded blocks until that moment. Do that when we detect the
task is being frozen.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216322
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913150504.9054-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 45e4ab320c ]
Currently we set the group's trimmed bit in ext4_trim_all_free() based
on return value of ext4_try_to_trim_range(). However when we will want
to abort trimming because of suspend attempt, we want to return success
from ext4_try_to_trim_range() but not set the trimmed bit. Instead
implementing awkward propagation of this information, just move setting
of trimmed bit into ext4_try_to_trim_range() when the whole group is
trimmed.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913150504.9054-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2327fb2e23 ]
There is no good reason for the s_last_trim_minblks to be atomic. There is
no data integrity needed and there is no real danger in setting and
reading it in a racy manner. Change it to be unsigned long, the same type
as s_clusters_per_group which is the maximum that's allowed.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211103145122.17338-1-lczerner@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 45e4ab320c ("ext4: move setting of trimmed bit into ext4_try_to_trim_range()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Baokun Li