[ Upstream commit ed29b0b4fd ]
In preparation for splitting io_uring up a bit, move it into its own
top level directory. It didn't really belong in fs/ anyway, as it's
not a file system only API.
This adds io_uring/ and moves the core files in there, and updates the
MAINTAINERS file for the new location.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 0d362be5b1 upstream.
Users of GNU ld (BFD) from binutils 2.39+ will observe multiple
instances of a new warning when linking kernels in the form:
ld: warning: vmlinux: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack
ld: NOTE: This behaviour is deprecated and will be removed in a future version of the linker
ld: warning: vmlinux has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions
Generally, we would like to avoid the stack being executable. Because
there could be a need for the stack to be executable, assembler sources
have to opt-in to this security feature via explicit creation of the
.note.GNU-stack feature (which compilers create by default) or command
line flag --noexecstack. Or we can simply tell the linker the
production of such sections is irrelevant and to link the stack as
--noexecstack.
LLVM's LLD linker defaults to -z noexecstack, so this flag isn't
strictly necessary when linking with LLD, only BFD, but it doesn't hurt
to be explicit here for all linkers IMO. --no-warn-rwx-segments is
currently BFD specific and only available in the current latest release,
so it's wrapped in an ld-option check.
While the kernel makes extensive usage of ELF sections, it doesn't use
permissions from ELF segments.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/3af4127a-f453-4cf7-f133-a181cce06f73@kernel.dk/
Link: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=ba951afb99912da01a6e8434126b8fac7aa75107
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57009
Reported-and-tested-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Suggested-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 53632ba87d upstream.
If CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS is enabled and the kernel is built from
a pristine state, the vmlinux is linked twice.
Commit 3fdc7d3fe4 ("kbuild: link vmlinux only once for
CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS") explains why this happens, but it did not fix
the issue at all.
Now I realized I had applied a wrong patch.
In v1 patch [1], the autoksyms_recursive target correctly recurses to
"$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile autoksyms_recursive".
In v2 patch [2], I accidentally dropped the diff line, and it recurses to
"$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile vmlinux".
Restore the code I intended in v1.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kbuild/1521045861-22418-8-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kbuild/1521166725-24157-8-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com/
Fixes: 3fdc7d3fe4 ("kbuild: link vmlinux only once for CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS")
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit f0be87c42c ]
In commit 8b202ee218 ("s390: disable -Warray-bounds") the s390 people
disabled the '-Warray-bounds' warning for gcc-12, because the new logic
in gcc would cause warnings for their use of the S390_lowcore macro,
which accesses absolute pointers.
It turns out gcc-12 has many other issues in this area, so this takes
that s390 warning disable logic, and turns it into a kernel build config
entry instead.
Part of the intent is that we can make this all much more targeted, and
use this conflig flag to disable it in only particular configurations
that cause problems, with the s390 case as an example:
select GCC12_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS
and we could do that for other configuration cases that cause issues.
Or we could possibly use the CONFIG_CC_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS thing in a more
targeted way, and disable the warning only for particular uses: again
the s390 case as an example:
KBUILD_CFLAGS_DECOMPRESSOR += $(if $(CONFIG_CC_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS),-Wno-array-bounds)
but this ends up just doing it globally in the top-level Makefile, since
the current issues are spread fairly widely all over:
KBUILD_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_CC_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS) += -Wno-array-bounds
We'll try to limit this later, since the gcc-12 problems are rare enough
that *much* of the kernel can be built with it without disabling this
warning.
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 49beadbd47 ]
While the concept of checking for dangling pointers to local variables
at function exit is really interesting, the gcc-12 implementation is not
compatible with reality, and results in false positives.
For example, gcc sees us putting things on a local list head allocated
on the stack, which involves exactly those kinds of pointers to the
local stack entry:
In function ‘__list_add’,
inlined from ‘list_add_tail’ at include/linux/list.h:102:2,
inlined from ‘rebuild_snap_realms’ at fs/ceph/snap.c:434:2:
include/linux/list.h:74:19: warning: storing the address of local variable ‘realm_queue’ in ‘*&realm_27(D)->rebuild_item.prev’ [-Wdangling-pointer=]
74 | new->prev = prev;
| ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
But then gcc - understandably - doesn't really understand the big
picture how the doubly linked list works, so doesn't see how we then end
up emptying said list head in a loop and the pointer we added has been
removed.
Gcc also complains about us (intentionally) using this as a way to store
a kind of fake stack trace, eg
drivers/acpi/acpica/utdebug.c:40:38: warning: storing the address of local variable ‘current_sp’ in ‘acpi_gbl_entry_stack_pointer’ [-Wdangling-pointer=]
40 | acpi_gbl_entry_stack_pointer = ¤t_sp;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
which is entirely reasonable from a compiler standpoint, and we may want
to change those kinds of patterns, but not not.
So this is one of those "it would be lovely if the compiler were to
complain about us leaving dangling pointers to the stack", but not this
way.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This flag is specific to clang, where it is only used by the 32-bit and
64-bit ARM backends. In certain situations, the presence of this flag
will cause a warning, as shown by commit 6580c5c18f ("um: clang: Strip
out -mno-global-merge from USER_CFLAGS").
Since commit 61163efae0 ("kbuild: LLVMLinux: Add Kbuild support for
building kernel with Clang") that added this flag back in 2014, there
have been quite a few changes to the GlobalMerge pass in LLVM. Building
several different ARCH=arm and ARCH=arm64 configurations with LLVM 11
(minimum) and 15 (current main version) with this flag removed (i.e.,
with the default of '-mglobal-merge') reveals no modpost warnings, so it
is likely that the issue noted in the comment is no longer relevant due
to changes in LLVM or modpost, meaning this flag can be removed.
If any new warnings show up that are a result of the removal of this
flag, it can be added back under arch/arm{,64}/Makefile to avoid
warnings on other architectures.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
- Add new environment variables, USERCFLAGS and USERLDFLAGS to allow
additional flags to be passed to user-space programs.
- Fix missing fflush() bugs in Kconfig and fixdep
- Fix a minor bug in the comment format of the .config file
- Make kallsyms ignore llvm's local labels, .L*
- Fix UAPI compile-test for cross-compiling with Clang
- Extend the LLVM= syntax to support LLVM=<suffix> form for using a
particular version of LLVm, and LLVM=<prefix> form for using custom
LLVM in a particular directory path.
- Clean up Makefiles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=84rW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'kbuild-v5.18-v2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild
Pull Kbuild updates from Masahiro Yamada:
- Add new environment variables, USERCFLAGS and USERLDFLAGS to allow
additional flags to be passed to user-space programs.
- Fix missing fflush() bugs in Kconfig and fixdep
- Fix a minor bug in the comment format of the .config file
- Make kallsyms ignore llvm's local labels, .L*
- Fix UAPI compile-test for cross-compiling with Clang
- Extend the LLVM= syntax to support LLVM=<suffix> form for using a
particular version of LLVm, and LLVM=<prefix> form for using custom
LLVM in a particular directory path.
- Clean up Makefiles
* tag 'kbuild-v5.18-v2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild:
kbuild: Make $(LLVM) more flexible
kbuild: add --target to correctly cross-compile UAPI headers with Clang
fixdep: use fflush() and ferror() to ensure successful write to files
arch: syscalls: simplify uapi/kapi directory creation
usr/include: replace extra-y with always-y
certs: simplify empty certs creation in certs/Makefile
certs: include certs/signing_key.x509 unconditionally
kallsyms: ignore all local labels prefixed by '.L'
kconfig: fix missing '# end of' for empty menu
kconfig: add fflush() before ferror() check
kbuild: replace $(if A,A,B) with $(or A,B)
kbuild: Add environment variables for userprogs flags
kbuild: unify cmd_copy and cmd_shipped
The LLVM make variable allows a developer to quickly switch between the
GNU and LLVM tools. However, it does not handle versioned binaries, such
as the ones shipped by Debian, as LLVM=1 just defines the tool variables
with the unversioned binaries.
There was some discussion during the review of the patch that introduces
LLVM=1 around versioned binaries, ultimately coming to the conclusion
that developers can just add the folder that contains the unversioned
binaries to their PATH, as Debian's versioned suffixed binaries are
really just symlinks to the unversioned binaries in /usr/lib/llvm-#/bin:
$ realpath /usr/bin/clang-14
/usr/lib/llvm-14/bin/clang
$ PATH=/usr/lib/llvm-14/bin:$PATH make ... LLVM=1
However, that can be cumbersome to developers who are constantly testing
series with different toolchains and versions. It is simple enough to
support these versioned binaries directly in the Kbuild system by
allowing the developer to specify the version suffix with LLVM=, which
is shorter than the above suggestion:
$ make ... LLVM=-14
It does not change the meaning of LLVM=1 (which will continue to use
unversioned binaries) and it does not add too much additional complexity
to the existing $(LLVM) code, while allowing developers to quickly test
their series with different versions of the whole LLVM suite of tools.
Some developers may build LLVM from source but not add the binaries to
their PATH, as they may not want to use that toolchain systemwide.
Support those developers by allowing them to supply the directory that
the LLVM tools are available in, as it is no more complex to support
than the version suffix change above.
$ make ... LLVM=/path/to/llvm/
Update and reorder the documentation to reflect these new additions.
At the same time, notate that LLVM=0 is not the same as just omitting it
altogether, which has confused people in the past.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200317215515.226917-1-ndesaulniers@google.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220224151322.072632223@infradead.org/
Suggested-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
- Enable -Warray-bounds globally
- Enable -Wzero-length-bounds globally
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=yeZk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'array-bounds-v5.18-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux
Pull array-bounds updates from Kees Cook:
"This enables -Warray-bounds and -Wzero-length-bounds, now that the
many bug fixes have landed all over the place in the kernel, and in
GCC itself[1].
A couple fixes[2] for known corner-case issues currently live in my
"pending-fixes" tree which I'm expecting to send next week if other
maintainers still haven't picked them up.
I'm also expecting we can enable -Wstringop-overflow next cycle, as
there are only a few stragglers[3], but it might even be possible for
this release"
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next/pending-fixes&id=2d253138910eec553fc706379914243d71de9b85
[3] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/181
* tag 'array-bounds-v5.18-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux:
Makefile: Enable -Wzero-length-bounds
Makefile: Enable -Warray-bounds
Linus pointed out the benefits of C99 some years ago, especially variable
declarations in loops [1]. At that time, we were not ready for the
migration due to old compilers.
Recently, Jakob Koschel reported a bug in list_for_each_entry(), which
leaks the invalid pointer out of the loop [2]. In the discussion, we
agreed that the time had come. Now that GCC 5.1 is the minimum compiler
version, there is nothing to prevent us from going to -std=gnu99, or even
straight to -std=gnu11.
Discussions for a better list iterator implementation are ongoing, but
this patch set must land first.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgr12JkKmRd21qh-se-_Gs69kbPgR9x4C+Es-yJV2GLkA@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/86C4CE7D-6D93-456B-AA82-F8ADEACA40B7@gmail.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQJJBAABCgAzFiEEbmPs18K1szRHjPqEPYsBB53g2wYFAmI9JqMVHG1hc2FoaXJv
eUBrZXJuZWwub3JnAAoJED2LAQed4NsG3dkP/Ar7r8m4hc60kJE8JfXaxDpGOGka
2yVm0EPfwV1lFGq440p4mqKc1iRTVLNMPsyaG/ZhriIp8PlSUjXLW290Sty6Z8Pd
zcxwDg09ZXkMoDX+lc2Wr9F0wpswWJjqU/TzGLP5/qkVMe46KheXIQSPJAp8tVUt
u2of/MTgTVMa4r7Iex/+NFWCPr4lTkWkSfzVN/Jd1r91UOyzy4E1VFRNlXIk/Fc9
BFa67k0SHx/3FFElfwzFaejYUZjHjNzK3E1Zq8Q1vkWUxrzeEnzqTEiP7QaAi4Sa
7MbqyqQvNoPw3uvKu5kwjDE+LHMEPTsmuaKVFpAc+qCpMtZCI6g9Q48pzQsWBMO2
hZlEmYR9Zk0TpJp1flpOnNzoy7xPzNs0rcB3PaSOZyv+dTqtJ981IP+r4RNVlwje
y3N9vq4RSAj/kAE/wi6FiPc/8vfbY71PbEXmg8556+kn3ne6aXl13ZrXIxz8w5jK
bIgIFmrEPH7941KvFjoXhaFp/qv9hvLpWhQZu7CFRaj5V28qqUQ5TQFJREPePRtJ
RFPEuOJqEGMxW/xbhcfrA1AO/y9Grxbe65e8Mph4YCfWpWaUww6vN01LC+k6UgDm
Yq2u+wSFjWpRxOEPLWNsjnrZZgfdjk22O+TNOMs92X8/gXinmu3kZG5IUavahg7+
J0SsIjIXhmLGKdDm
=KMDk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'kbuild-gnu11-v5.18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild
Pull Kbuild update for C11 language base from Masahiro Yamada:
"Kbuild -std=gnu11 updates for v5.18
Linus pointed out the benefits of C99 some years ago, especially
variable declarations in loops [1]. At that time, we were not ready
for the migration due to old compilers.
Recently, Jakob Koschel reported a bug in list_for_each_entry(), which
leaks the invalid pointer out of the loop [2]. In the discussion, we
agreed that the time had come. Now that GCC 5.1 is the minimum
compiler version, there is nothing to prevent us from going to
-std=gnu99, or even straight to -std=gnu11.
Discussions for a better list iterator implementation are ongoing, but
this patch set must land first"
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgr12JkKmRd21qh-se-_Gs69kbPgR9x4C+Es-yJV2GLkA@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/86C4CE7D-6D93-456B-AA82-F8ADEACA40B7@gmail.com/
* tag 'kbuild-gnu11-v5.18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild:
Kbuild: use -std=gnu11 for KBUILD_USERCFLAGS
Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11
Kbuild: use -Wdeclaration-after-statement
Kbuild: add -Wno-shift-negative-value where -Wextra is used
As we change the C language standard for the kernel from gnu89 to
gnu11, it makes sense to also update the version for user space
compilation.
Some users have older native compilers than what they use for
kernel builds, so I considered using gnu99 as the default version
for wider compatibility with gcc-4.6 and earlier.
However, testing with older compilers showed that we already require
HOSTCC version 5.1 as well because a lot of host tools include
linux/compiler.h that uses __has_attribute():
CC tools/objtool/exec-cmd.o
In file included from tools/include/linux/compiler_types.h:36:0,
from tools/include/linux/compiler.h:5,
from exec-cmd.c:2:
tools/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:19:5: error: "__has_attribute" is not defined [-Werror=undef]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, which allows using variable
declaration inside of a for() loop. While the C99, C11 and later standards
introduce many other features, most of these are already available in
gnu89 as GNU extensions as well.
An earlier attempt to do this when gcc-5 started defaulting to
-std=gnu11 failed because at the time that caused warnings about
designated initializers with older compilers. Now that gcc-5.1 is
the minimum compiler version used for building kernels, that is no
longer a concern. Similarly, the behavior of 'inline' functions changes
between gnu89 using gnu_inline behavior and gnu11 using standard c99+
behavior, but this was taken care of by defining 'inline' to include
__attribute__((gnu_inline)) in order to allow building with clang a
while ago.
Nathan Chancellor reported a new -Wdeclaration-after-statement
warning that appears in a system header on arm, this still needs a
workaround.
The differences between gnu99, gnu11, gnu1x and gnu17 are fairly
minimal and mainly impact warnings at the -Wpedantic level that the
kernel never enables. Between these, gnu11 is the newest version
that is supported by all supported compiler versions, though it is
only the default on gcc-5, while all other supported versions of
gcc or clang default to gnu1x/gnu17.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wiyCH7xeHcmiFJ-YgXUy2Jaj7pnkdKpcovt8fYbVFW3TA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1603
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
The kernel is moving from using `-std=gnu89` to `-std=gnu11`, permitting
the use of additional C11 features such as for-loop initial declarations.
One contentious aspect of C99 is that it permits mixed declarations and
code, and for now at least, it seems preferable to enforce that
declarations must come first.
These warnings were already enabled in the kernel itself, but not
for KBUILD_USERCFLAGS or the compat VDSO on arch/arm64, which uses
a separate set of CFLAGS.
This patch fixes an existing violation in modpost.c, which is not
reported because of the missing flag in KBUILD_USERCFLAGS:
| scripts/mod/modpost.c: In function ‘match’:
| scripts/mod/modpost.c:837:3: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
| 837 | const char *endp = p + strlen(p) - 1;
| | ^~~~~
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
[arnd: don't add a duplicate flag to the default set, update changelog]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> # LLVM/Clang v13.0.0 (x86-64)
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
$(or ...) is available since GNU Make 3.81, and useful to shorten the
code in some places.
Covert as follows:
$(if A,A,B) --> $(or A,B)
This patch also converts:
$(if A, A, B) --> $(or A, B)
Strictly speaking, the latter is not an equivalent conversion because
GNU Make keeps spaces after commas; if A is not empty, $(if A, A, B)
expands to " A", while $(or A, B) expands to "A".
Anyway, preceding spaces are not significant in the code hunks I touched.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Allow additional arguments be passed to userprogs compilation.
Reproducible clang builds need to provide a sysroot and gcc path to
ensure the same toolchain is used across hosts. KCFLAGS is not currently
used for any user programs compilation, so add new USERCFLAGS and
USERLDFLAGS which serves similar purpose as HOSTCFLAGS/HOSTLDFLAGS.
Clang might detect GCC installation on hosts which have it installed
to a default location in /. With addition of these environment
variables, you can specify flags such as:
$ make USERCFLAGS=--sysroot=/path/to/sysroot
This can also be used to specify different sysroots such as musl or
bionic which may be installed on the host in paths that the compiler
may not search by default.
Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
With all known internal zero-length accesses fixed, it is possible to
enable -Wzero-length-bounds globally. Since this is included by default
in -Warray-bounds, we just need to stop disabling it.
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKwvOd=bcs5W6eEDXGn5ROR2EuMiSp_2e6sLFxak=KK6yLWcvA@mail.gmail.com
With the recent fixes for flexible arrays and expanded FORTIFY_SOURCE
coverage, it is now possible to enable -Warray-bounds. Since both GCC
and Clang include -Warray-bounds in -Wall, adjust the Makefile to just
stop disabling it.
Note that this option can be conservative in its warnings (which is
done at casting time rather than access time), but this is reasonable
since the cast variables may be accessed out of a scope where the true
size of the original object can't be evaluated. These handful of false
positives (which are arguably bad casts and can be easily avoided),
are worth dealing with because of the many places where this option
has helped identify missed bounds checks and even accesses done against
cases where a NULL pointer could be reached.
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/151
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Co-developed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Greg Kroah-Hartman