Now that we have a central API to handle all OPP table configurations,
migrate the set-regulators family of helpers to use the new
infrastructure.
The return type and parameter to the APIs change a bit due to this,
update the current users as well in the same commit in order to avoid
breaking builds.
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Make dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() accept a NULL terminated list of names
instead of making the callers keep the two parameters in sync, which
creates an opportunity for bugs to get in.
Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> # panfrost
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Set the newly added .register_em() callback with
cpufreq_register_em_with_opp() to register with the EM core.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
The function dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() may return -EPROBE_DEFER,
which needs to be propagated to the caller to try probing the driver
later on.
Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
[ Viresh: Massage changelog/subject, improve code. ]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
During cpufreq driver's registration, if the ->init() callback for all
the CPUs fail then there is not much point in keeping the driver around
as it will only account for more of unnecessary noise, for example
cpufreq core will try to suspend/resume the driver which never got
registered properly.
The removal of such a driver is avoided if the driver carries the
CPUFREQ_STICKY flag. This was added way back [1] in 2004 and perhaps no
one should ever need it now. A lot of drivers do set this flag, probably
because they just copied it from other drivers.
This was added earlier for some platforms [2] because their cpufreq
drivers were getting registered before the CPUs were registered with
subsys framework. And hence they used to fail.
The same isn't true anymore though. The current code flow in the kernel
is:
start_kernel()
-> kernel_init()
-> kernel_init_freeable()
-> do_basic_setup()
-> driver_init()
-> cpu_dev_init()
-> subsys_system_register() //For CPUs
-> do_initcalls()
-> cpufreq_register_driver()
Clearly, the CPUs will always get registered with subsys framework
before any cpufreq driver can get probed. Remove the flag and update the
relevant drivers.
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/include/linux/cpufreq.h?id=7cc9f0d9a1ab04cedc60d64fd8dcf7df224a3b4d # [1]
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1100.c?id=f59d3bbe35f6268d729f51be82af8325d62f20f5 # [2]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
there is no need for us to carry the extra checks. Drop them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Initially, the helper dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() was supposed to be used
only for the OPP core's internal use (it tries to find an existing OPP
table and if it doesn't find one, then it allocates the OPP table).
Sometime back, the cpufreq-dt driver started using it to make sure all
the relevant resources required by the OPP core are available earlier
during initialization process to properly propagate -EPROBE_DEFER.
It worked but it also abused the API to create an OPP table, which
should be created with the help of other helpers provided by the OPP
core.
The OPP core will be updated in a later commit to limit the scope of
dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to only finding an existing OPP table and not
create one. This commit updates the cpufreq-dt driver before that
happens.
Now the cpufreq-dt driver creates the OPP and cpufreq tables for all the
CPUs from driver's init callback itself.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Pull ARM cpufreq updates for 5.10-rc1 from Viresh Kumar:
"- STI cpufreq driver updates to allow new hardware (Alain Volmat).
- Minor tegra driver fixes around initial frequency mismatch warnings (Jon
Hunter).
- dev_err simplification for s5pv210 driver (Krzysztof Kozlowski).
- Qcom driver updates to allow new hardware and minor cleanup (Manivannan
Sadhasivam and Matthias Kaehlcke).
- Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE for armada driver (Pali Rohár).
- Improved defer-probe handling in cpufreq-dt driver (Stephan Gerhold).
- Call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() unconditionally for imx driver (Viresh
Kumar)."
* 'cpufreq/arm/linux-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm:
cpufreq: qcom: Don't add frequencies without an OPP
cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add cpufreq support for SM8250 SoC
cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use of_device_get_match_data for offsets and row size
cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() to simplify code
dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Document Qcom EPSS compatible
cpufreq: qcom-hw: Make use of cpufreq driver_data for passing pdev
cpufreq: armada-37xx: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
cpufreq: arm: Kconfig: add CPUFREQ_DT depend for STI CPUFREQ
cpufreq: dt-platdev: Blacklist st,stih418 SoC
cpufreq: sti-cpufreq: add stih418 support
cpufreq: s5pv210: Use dev_err instead of pr_err in probe
cpufreq: s5pv210: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
cpufreq: tegra186: Fix initial frequency
cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly
opp: Handle multiple calls for same OPP table in _of_add_opp_table_v1()
cpufreq: imx6q: Unconditionally call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()
opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER
To properly scale its per-entity load-tracking signals, the task scheduler
needs to be given a frequency scale factor, i.e. some image of the current
frequency the CPU is running at. Currently, this scale can be computed
either by using counters (APERF/MPERF on x86, AMU on arm64), or by
piggy-backing on the frequency selection done by cpufreq.
For the latter, drivers have to explicitly set the scale factor
themselves, despite it being purely boiler-plate code: the required
information depends entirely on the kind of frequency switch callback
implemented by the driver, i.e. either of: target_index(), target(),
fast_switch() and setpolicy().
The fitness of those callbacks with regard to driving the Frequency
Invariance Engine (FIE) is studied below:
target_index()
==============
Documentation states that the chosen frequency "must be determined by
freq_table[index].frequency". It isn't clear if it *has* to be that
frequency, or if it can use that frequency value to do some computation
that ultimately leads to a different frequency selection. All drivers
go for the former, while the vexpress-spc-cpufreq has an atypical
implementation which is handled separately.
Therefore, the hook works on the assumption the core can use
freq_table[index].frequency.
target()
=======
This has been flagged as deprecated since:
commit 9c0ebcf78f ("cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine")
It also doesn't have that many users:
gx-suspmod.c:439: .target = cpufreq_gx_target,
s3c24xx-cpufreq.c:428: .target = s3c_cpufreq_target,
intel_pstate.c:2528: .target = intel_cpufreq_target,
cppc_cpufreq.c:401: .target = cppc_cpufreq_set_target,
cpufreq-nforce2.c:371: .target = nforce2_target,
sh-cpufreq.c:163: .target = sh_cpufreq_target,
pcc-cpufreq.c:573: .target = pcc_cpufreq_target,
Similarly to the path taken for target_index() calls in the cpufreq core
during a frequency change, all of the drivers above will mark the end of a
frequency change by a call to cpufreq_freq_transition_end().
Therefore, cpufreq_freq_transition_end() can be used as the location for
the arch_set_freq_scale() call to potentially inform the scheduler of the
frequency change.
This change maintains the previous functionality for the drivers that
implement the target_index() callback, while also adding support for the
few drivers that implement the deprecated target() callback.
fast_switch()
=============
This callback *has* to return the frequency that was selected.
setpolicy()
===========
This callback does not have any designated way of informing what was the
end choice. But there are only two drivers using setpolicy(), and none
of them have current FIE support:
drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c:281: .setpolicy = longrun_set_policy,
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:2215: .setpolicy = intel_pstate_set_policy,
The intel_pstate is known to use counter-driven frequency invariance.
Conclusion
==========
Given that the significant majority of current FIE enabled drivers use
callbacks that lend themselves to triggering the setting of the FIE scale
factor in a generic way, move the invariance setter calls to cpufreq core.
As a result of setting the frequency scale factor in cpufreq core, after
callbacks that lend themselves to trigger it, remove this functionality
from the driver side.
To be noted that despite marking a successful frequency change, many
cpufreq drivers will consider the new frequency as the requested
frequency, although this is might not be the one granted by the hardware.
Therefore, the call to arch_set_freq_scale() is a "best effort" one, and
it is up to the architecture if the new frequency is used in the new
frequency scale factor setting (determined by the implementation of
arch_set_freq_scale()) or eventually used by the scheduler (determined
by the implementation of arch_scale_freq_capacity()). The architecture
is in a better position to decide if it has better methods to obtain
more accurate information regarding the current frequency and use that
information instead (for example, the use of counters).
Also, the implementation to arch_set_freq_scale() will now have to handle
error conditions (current frequency == 0) in order to prevent the
overhead in cpufreq core when the default arch_set_freq_scale()
implementation is used.
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpufreq-dt is currently unable to handle -EPROBE_DEFER properly
because the error code is not propagated for the cpufreq_driver->init()
callback. Instead, it attempts to avoid the situation by temporarily
requesting all resources within resources_available() and releasing them
again immediately after. This has several disadvantages:
- Whenever we add something like interconnect handling to the OPP core
we need to patch cpufreq-dt to request these resources early.
- resources_available() is only run for CPU0, but other clusters may
eventually depend on other resources that are not available yet.
(See FIXME comment removed by this commit...)
- All resources need to be looked up several times.
Now that the OPP core can propagate -EPROBE_DEFER during initialization,
it would be nice to avoid all that trouble and just propagate its error
code when necessary.
This commit refactors the cpufreq-dt driver to initialize private_data
before registering the cpufreq driver. We do this by iterating over
all possible CPUs and ensure that all resources are initialized:
1. dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() ensures the OPP table is allocated
and initialized with clock and interconnects.
2. dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() requests the regulators and assigns
them to the OPP table.
3. We call dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus() early so that we only
initialize the OPP table once for each shared policy.
With these changes, we actually end up saving a few lines of code,
the resources are no longer looked up multiple times and everything
should be much more robust.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
[ Viresh: Use list_head structure for maintaining the list and minor
changes ]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
The Energy Model framework supports not only CPU devices. Drop the CPU
specific interface with cpumask and add struct device. Add also a return
value, user might use it. This new interface provides easy way to create
a simple Energy Model, which then might be used by e.g. thermal subsystem.
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In addition to clocks and regulators, some devices can scale the bandwidth
of their on-chip interconnect - for example between CPU and DDR memory. Add
support for that, so that platforms which support it can make use of it.
Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
[ Viresh: Reused dev_pm_opp_of_find_icc_paths(). Also drop the depends
on from Kconfig. ]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
fixup! cpufreq: dt: Add support for interconnect bandwidth scaling
Platforms may need to implement platform specific get_intermediate and
target_intermediate hooks.
Update cpufreq-dt driver's platform data to contain those for such
platforms.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Based on 2 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation #
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* pm-opp:
cpufreq: OMAP: Register an Energy Model
cpufreq: imx6q: Register an Energy Model
opp: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
cpufreq: mediatek: Register an Energy Model
cpufreq: scmi: Register an Energy Model
cpufreq: arm_big_little: Register an Energy Model
cpufreq: scpi: Register an Energy Model
cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model
Implement the light-weight tear down and bring up helpers to reduce the
amount of work to do on CPU offline/online operation.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Now that PM_OPP provides a helper function to estimate the power
consumed by CPUs, make sure to try and register an Energy Model (EM)
from cpufreq-dt, hence ensuring interested subsystems (the task
scheduler, for example) can make use of that information when available.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Use the CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV flag to allow cpufreq core to
automatically register as a thermal cooling device.
This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We can not call dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table() freely anymore
since the latest OPP core updates as that uses reference counting to
free resources. There are cases where no static OPPs are added (using
DT) for a platform and trying to remove the OPP table may end up
decrementing refcount which is already zero and hence generating
warnings.
Lets track if we were able to add static OPPs or not and then only
remove the table based on that. Some reshuffling of code is also done to
do that.
Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Platforms may need to implement platform specific suspend/resume hooks.
Update cpufreq-dt driver's platform data to contain those for such
platforms.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from cpufreq-dt driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
of_cpufreq_cooling_register() isn't used by anyone and so can be
removed, but then we would be left with two routines:
cpufreq_cooling_register() and of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() that
would look odd.
Remove current implementation of of_cpufreq_cooling_register() and
rename of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() as
of_cpufreq_cooling_register(). This simplifies lots of stuff.
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
All the callers of of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() have almost
identical code and it makes more sense to move that code into the helper
as its all about reading DT properties.
This got rid of lot of redundant code.
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Call the frequency-invariance setter function arch_set_freq_scale()
if the new frequency has been successfully set which is indicated by
dev_pm_opp_set_rate() returning 0.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
On many platforms, CPUs can do DVFS across cpufreq policies. i.e CPU
from policy-A can change frequency of CPUs belonging to policy-B.
This is quite common in case of ARM platforms where we don't
configure any per-cpu register.
Add a flag to identify such platforms and update
cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs() to allow remote callbacks if this flag is
set.
Also enable the flag for cpufreq-dt driver which is used only on ARM
platforms currently.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The CPU cooling driver uses the cpufreq policy, to get clip_cpus, the
frequency table, etc. Most of the callers of CPU cooling driver's
registration routines have the cpufreq policy with them, but they only
pass the policy->related_cpus cpumask. The __cpufreq_cooling_register()
routine then gets the policy by itself and uses it.
It would be much better if the callers can pass the policy instead
directly. This also fixes a basic design flaw, where the policy can be
freed while the CPU cooling driver is still active.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
There is only one user of dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and that uses it
to get the OPP rate for the suspend_opp.
Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() as dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq()
and return the rate directly from it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates
the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator().
This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with
multiple regulators.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Joonyoung Shim reported an interesting problem on his ARM octa-core
Odoroid-XU3 platform. During system suspend, dev_pm_opp_put_regulator()
was failing for a struct device for which dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() is
called earlier.
This happened because an earlier call to
dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table() function (from cpufreq-dt.c file)
removed all the entries from opp_table->dev_list apart from the last CPU
device in the cpumask of CPUs sharing the OPP.
But both dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and dev_pm_opp_put_regulator()
routines get CPU device for the first CPU in the cpumask. And so the OPP
core failed to find the OPP table for the struct device.
This patch attempts to fix this problem by returning a pointer to the
opp_table from dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and using that as the
parameter to dev_pm_opp_put_regulator(). This ensures that the
dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() doesn't fail to find the opp table.
Note that similar design problem also exists with other
dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs, but those aren't used currently by anyone and
so we don't need to update them for now.
Cc: 4.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+
Reported-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ Viresh: Wrote commit log and tested on exynos 5250 ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq-dt driver is also used for systems with multiple
clock/voltage domains for CPUs, i.e. multiple cpufreq policies in a
system.
And in such cases the platform users may want to enable "governor
tunables per policy". Support that via platform data, as not all users
of the driver would want that behavior.
Reported-by: Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This is leftover from an earlier patch which removed the usage of
platform data but forgot to remove this line. Remove it now.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There are no more users of platform-data for cpufreq-dt driver, get rid
of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Existing platforms, which do not support operating-points-v2, can
explicitly tell the opp core that some of the CPUs share opp tables,
with help of dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus().
For such platforms, explicitly ask the opp core to provide list of CPUs
sharing the opp table with current cpu device, before falling back to
platform data.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The comment in file header doesn't hold true anymore, drop it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
OPP layer manages it now and cpufreq-dt driver doesn't need it. But, we
still need to check for availability of resources for deferred probing.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Its already done by core and we don't need to get it anymore. And so,
we don't need to get of node in cpufreq_init() anymore, move that to
find_supply_name() instead.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
OPP core supports frequency/voltage changes based on the target
frequency now, use that instead of open coding the same in cpufreq-dt
driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
OPP layer has all the information now to calculate transition latency
(clock_latency + voltage_latency). Lets reuse the OPP layer helper
dev_pm_opp_get_max_transition_latency() instead of open coding the same
in cpufreq-dt driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The core already have a valid regulator set for the device opp and the
unsupported OPPs are already disabled by the core. There is no need to
repeat that in the user drivers, get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
OPP core can handle the regulators by itself, and but it needs to know
the name of the regulator to fetch. Add support for that.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
"clock-latency" is handled by OPP layer for all bindings and so there is
no need to make special calls for V1 bindings. Use
dev_pm_opp_get_max_clock_latency() for both the cases.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
That's the real purpose of this field, i.e. to take special care of old
OPP V1 bindings. Lets name it accordingly, so that it can be used
elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We have the device structure available now, lets use it for better print
messages.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
gcc warns quite a bit about values returned from allocate_resources()
in cpufreq-dt.c:
cpufreq-dt.c: In function 'cpufreq_init':
cpufreq-dt.c:327:6: error: 'cpu_dev' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
cpufreq-dt.c:197:17: note: 'cpu_dev' was declared here
cpufreq-dt.c:376:2: error: 'cpu_clk' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
cpufreq-dt.c:199:14: note: 'cpu_clk' was declared here
cpufreq-dt.c: In function 'dt_cpufreq_probe':
cpufreq-dt.c:461:2: error: 'cpu_clk' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
cpufreq-dt.c:447:14: note: 'cpu_clk' was declared here
The problem is that it's slightly hard for gcc to follow return
codes across PTR_ERR() calls.
This patch uses explicit assignments to the "ret" variable to make
it easier for gcc to verify that the code is actually correct,
without the need to add a bogus initialization.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The function can return negative values so it should be assigned
to signed type.
The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci.
Link: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Support registering cooling devices with dynamic power coefficient
where provided by the device tree. This allows OF registered cooling
devices driver to be used with the power_allocator thermal governor.
Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
That's the naming convention followed in most of opp core, but few
routines didn't follow this, fix them.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
free-table routines are opposite of init-table ones, and must be named
to make that clear. Opposite of 'init' is 'exit', but those doesn't suit
really well.
Replace 'init' with 'add' and 'free' with 'remove'.
Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add suspend frequency support and if needed set it to
the frequency obtained from the suspend opp (can be defined
using opp-v2 bindings and is optional).
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tolerance applies on both sides of the target voltage, i.e. both min and
max sides. But while checking if a voltage is supported by the regulator
or not, we haven't taken care of tolerance on the lower side. Fix that.
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Fixes: 045ee45c4f ("cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: disable unsupported OPPs")
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Viresh Kumar