From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
[ upstream commit ebdfefc09c ]
If we setup the ring with SQPOLL, then that polling thread has its
own io-wq setup. This means that if the application uses
IORING_REGISTER_IOWQ_AFF to set the io-wq affinity, we should not be
setting it for the invoking task, but rather the sqpoll task.
Add an sqpoll helper that parks the thread and updates the affinity,
and use that one if we're using SQPOLL.
Fixes: fe76421d1d ("io_uring: allow user configurable IO thread CPU affinity")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Link: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/discussions/884
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ upstream commit 45500dc4e0 ]
io-wq will retry iopoll even when it failed with -EAGAIN. If that
races with task exit, which sets TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL for all its workers,
such workers might potentially infinitely spin retrying iopoll again and
again and each time failing on some allocation / waiting / etc. Don't
keep spinning if io-wq is dying.
Fixes: 561fb04a6a ("io_uring: replace workqueue usage with io-wq")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e6db6f9398 upstream.
We have two types of task_work based creation, one is using an existing
worker to setup a new one (eg when going to sleep and we have no free
workers), and the other is allocating a new worker. Only the latter
should be freed when we cancel task_work creation for a new worker.
Fixes: af82425c6a ("io_uring/io-wq: free worker if task_work creation is canceled")
Reported-by: syzbot+d56ec896af3637bdb7e4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit af82425c6a upstream.
If we cancel the task_work, the worker will never come into existance.
As this is the last reference to it, ensure that we get it freed
appropriately.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: 진호 <wnwlsgh98@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
If the CPU mask allocation for a node fails, then the memory allocated for
the 'io_wqe' struct of the current node doesn't get freed on the error
handling path, since it has not yet been added to the 'wqes' array.
This was spotted when fuzzing v6.1-rc1 with Syzkaller:
BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff8880093d5000 (size 1024):
comm "syz-executor.2", pid 7701, jiffies 4295048595 (age 13.900s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<00000000cb463369>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x18e/0x720
[<00000000147a3f9c>] kmalloc_node_trace+0x2a/0x130
[<000000004e107011>] io_wq_create+0x7b9/0xdc0
[<00000000c38b2018>] io_uring_alloc_task_context+0x31e/0x59d
[<00000000867399da>] __io_uring_add_tctx_node.cold+0x19/0x1ba
[<000000007e0e7a79>] io_uring_setup.cold+0x1b80/0x1dce
[<00000000b545e9f6>] __x64_sys_io_uring_setup+0x5d/0x80
[<000000008a8a7508>] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x90
[<000000004ac08bec>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
Fixes: 0e03496d19 ("io-wq: use private CPU mask")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rafael Mendonca <rafaelmendsr@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221020014710.902201-1-rafaelmendsr@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In preparation for splitting io_uring up a bit, move it into its own
top level directory. It didn't really belong in fs/ anyway, as it's
not a file system only API.
This adds io_uring/ and moves the core files in there, and updates the
MAINTAINERS file for the new location.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Pavel Begunkov