[ Upstream commit 3f4830abd2 ]
Smatch complains "err" can be uninitialized in the caller.
fs/ext4/indirect.c:349 ext4_alloc_branch()
error: uninitialized symbol 'err'.
Set the error to zero on the success path.
Fixes: 8016e29f43 ("ext4: fast commit recovery path")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/363a4673-0fb8-4adf-b4fb-90a499077276@moroto.mountain
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 68ee261fb1 ]
If one group is marked as block bitmap corrupted, its free blocks cannot
be used and its free count is also deducted from the global
sbi->s_freeclusters_counter. User might be confused about the absent
free space because we can't query the information about corrupted block
groups except unreliable error messages in syslog. So add a hint to show
block bitmap corrupted groups in mb_groups.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240119061154.1525781-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4fbf8bc733 ]
When yangerkun review commit 93cdf49f6e ("ext4: Fix best extent lstart
adjustment logic in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa()"), it was found that the best
extent did not completely cover the original request after adjusting the
best extent lstart in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa() as follows:
original request: 2/10(8)
normalized request: 0/64(64)
best extent: 0/9(9)
When we check if best ex can be kept at start of goal, ac_o_ex.fe_logical
is 2 less than the adjusted best extent logical end 9, so we think the
adjustment is done. But obviously 0/9(9) doesn't cover 2/10(8), so we
should determine here if the original request logical end is less than or
equal to the adjusted best extent logical end.
In addition, add a comment stating when adjusted best_ex will not cover
the original request, and remove the duplicate assertion because adjusting
lstart makes no change to b_ex.fe_len.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3630fa7f-b432-7afd-5f79-781bc3b2c5ea@huawei.com
Fixes: 93cdf49f6e ("ext4: Fix best extent lstart adjustment logic in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa()")
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240201141845.1879253-1-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
As 'needed' to trace_ext4_discard_preallocations is always 0 which
is meaningless. Just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240105092102.496631-10-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The "needed" controls the number of ext4_prealloc_space to discard in
ext4_discard_preallocations. Function ext4_discard_preallocations is
supposed to discard all non-used preallocated blocks when "needed"
is 0 and now ext4_discard_preallocations is always called with "needed"
= 0. Remove unnecessary parameter "needed" and remove all non-used
preallocated spaces in ext4_discard_preallocations to simplify the
code.
Note: If count of non-used preallocated spaces could be more than
UINT_MAX, there was a memory leak as some non-used preallocated
spaces are left ununsed and this commit will fix it. Otherwise,
there is no behavior change.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240105092102.496631-9-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Function ext4_mb_release_context always return 0 and the return value is
never used. Just remove unneeded return value of ext4_mb_release_context.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240105092102.496631-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Otherwise unlocking the group in ext4_grp_locked_error may allow other
processes to modify the core block bitmap that is known to be corrupt.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-9-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Places the logic for checking if the group's block bitmap is corrupt under
the protection of the group lock to avoid allocating blocks from the group
with a corrupted block bitmap.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-8-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Determine if the group block bitmap is corrupted before using ac_b_ex in
ext4_mb_try_best_found() to avoid allocating blocks from a group with a
corrupted block bitmap in the following concurrency and making the
situation worse.
ext4_mb_regular_allocator
ext4_lock_group(sb, group)
ext4_mb_good_group
// check if the group bbitmap is corrupted
ext4_mb_complex_scan_group
// Scan group gets ac_b_ex but doesn't use it
ext4_unlock_group(sb, group)
ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(group)
// The block bitmap was corrupted during
// the group unlock gap.
ext4_mb_try_best_found
ext4_lock_group(ac->ac_sb, group)
ext4_mb_use_best_found
mb_mark_used
// Allocating blocks in block bitmap corrupted group
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-7-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Determine if bb_fragments is 0 instead of determining bb_free to eliminate
the risk of dividing by zero when the block bitmap is corrupted.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-6-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
After updating bb_free in mb_free_blocks, it is possible to return without
updating bb_fragments because the block being freed is found to have
already been freed, which leads to inconsistency between bb_free and
bb_fragments.
Since the group may be unlocked in ext4_grp_locked_error(), this can lead
to problems such as dividing by zero when calculating the average fragment
length. Hence move the update of bb_free to after the block double-free
check guarantees that the corresponding statistics are updated only after
the core block bitmap is modified.
Fixes: eabe0444df ("ext4: speed-up releasing blocks on commit")
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-5-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This mostly reverts commit 6bd97bf273 ("ext4: remove redundant
mb_regenerate_buddy()") and reintroduces mb_regenerate_buddy(). Based on
code in mb_free_blocks(), fast commit replay can end up marking as free
blocks that are already marked as such. This causes corruption of the
buddy bitmap so we need to regenerate it in that case.
Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Fixes: 6bd97bf273 ("ext4: remove redundant mb_regenerate_buddy()")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-4-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Otherwise operating on an incorrupted block bitmap can lead to all sorts
of unknown problems.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104142040.2835097-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Suppose we issue two FITRIM ioctls for ranges [0,15] and [16,31] with
mininum length of trimmed range set to 8 blocks. If we have say a range of
blocks 10-22 free, this range will not be trimmed because it straddles the
boundary of the two FITRIM ranges and neither part is big enough. This is a
bit surprising to some users that call FITRIM on smaller ranges of blocks
to limit impact on the system. Also XFS trims all free space extents that
overlap with the specified range so we are inconsistent among filesystems.
Let's change ext4_try_to_trim_range() to consider for trimming the whole
free space extent that straddles the end of specified range, not just the
part of it within the range.
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231216010919.1995851-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently in case the goal length is a multiple of stripe size we use
ext4_mb_scan_aligned() to find the stripe size aligned physical blocks.
In case we are not able to find any, we again go back to calling
ext4_mb_choose_next_group() to search for a different suitable block
group. However, since the linear search always begins from the start,
most of the times we end up with the same BG and the cycle continues.
With large fliesystems, the CPU can be stuck in this loop for hours
which can slow down the whole system. Hence, until we figure out a
better way to continue the search (rather than starting from beginning)
in ext4_mb_choose_next_group(), lets just fallback to
ext4_mb_complex_scan_group() in case aligned scan fails, as it is much
more likely to find the needed blocks.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ee033f6dfa0a7f2934437008a909c3788233950f.1702455010.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The ext4 filesystem tracks the trim status of blocks at the group
level. When an entire group has been trimmed then it is marked as
such and subsequent trim invocations with the same minimum trim size
will not be attempted on that group unless it is marked as able to be
trimmed again such as when a block is freed.
Currently the last group can't be marked as trimmed due to incorrect
logic in ext4_last_grp_cluster(). ext4_last_grp_cluster() is supposed
to return the zero based index of the last cluster in a group. This is
then used by ext4_try_to_trim_range() to determine if the trim
operation spans the entire group and as such if the trim status of the
group should be recorded.
ext4_last_grp_cluster() takes a 0 based group index, thus the valid
values for grp are 0..(ext4_get_groups_count - 1). Any group index
less than (ext4_get_groups_count - 1) is not the last group and must
have EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb) clusters. For the last group we need
to calculate the number of clusters based on the number of blocks in
the group. Finally subtract 1 from the number of clusters as zero
based indexing is expected. Rearrange the function slightly to make
it clear what we are calculating and returning.
Reproducer:
// Create file system where the last group has fewer blocks than
// blocks per group
$ mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 -g 8192 /dev/nvme0n1 8191
$ mount /dev/nvme0n1 /mnt
Before Patch:
$ fstrim -v /mnt
/mnt: 25.9 MiB (27156480 bytes) trimmed
// Group not marked as trimmed so second invocation still discards blocks
$ fstrim -v /mnt
/mnt: 25.9 MiB (27156480 bytes) trimmed
After Patch:
fstrim -v /mnt
/mnt: 25.9 MiB (27156480 bytes) trimmed
// Group marked as trimmed so second invocation DOESN'T discard any blocks
fstrim -v /mnt
/mnt: 0 B (0 bytes) trimmed
Fixes: 45e4ab320c ("ext4: move setting of trimmed bit into ext4_try_to_trim_range()")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213051635.37731-1-surajjs@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
After first execution of mb_find_order_for_block():
'fe_start' is the value of 'block' passed in mb_find_extent().
'fe_len' is the difference between the length of order-chunk and
remainder of the block divided by order-chunk.
And 'next' does not require initialization after above modifications.
Signed-off-by: Gou Hao <gouhao@uniontech.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231113082617.11258-1-gouhao@uniontech.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
'blocks_per_page' is always 1 after 'if (blocks_per_page >= 2)',
'pnum' and 'block' are equal in this case.
Signed-off-by: Gou Hao <gouhao@uniontech.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024035215.29474-1-gouhao@uniontech.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
For files with logical blocks close to EXT_MAX_BLOCKS, the file size
predicted in ext4_mb_normalize_request() may exceed EXT_MAX_BLOCKS.
This can cause some blocks to be preallocated that will not be used.
And after [Fixes], the following issue may be triggered:
=========================================================
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:4653!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
CPU: 1 PID: 2357 Comm: xfs_io 6.7.0-rc2-00195-g0f5cc96c367f
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
pc : ext4_mb_use_inode_pa+0x148/0x208
lr : ext4_mb_use_inode_pa+0x98/0x208
Call trace:
ext4_mb_use_inode_pa+0x148/0x208
ext4_mb_new_inode_pa+0x240/0x4a8
ext4_mb_use_best_found+0x1d4/0x208
ext4_mb_try_best_found+0xc8/0x110
ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x11c/0xf48
ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x790/0xaa8
ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x7cc/0xd20
ext4_map_blocks+0x170/0x600
ext4_iomap_begin+0x1c0/0x348
=========================================================
Here is a calculation when adjusting ac_b_ex in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa():
ex.fe_logical = orig_goal_end - EXT4_C2B(sbi, ex.fe_len);
if (ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= ex.fe_logical)
goto adjust_bex;
The problem is that when orig_goal_end is subtracted from ac_b_ex.fe_len
it is still greater than EXT_MAX_BLOCKS, which causes ex.fe_logical to
overflow to a very small value, which ultimately triggers a BUG_ON in
ext4_mb_new_inode_pa() because pa->pa_free < len.
The last logical block of an actual write request does not exceed
EXT_MAX_BLOCKS, so in ext4_mb_normalize_request() also avoids normalizing
the last logical block to exceed EXT_MAX_BLOCKS to avoid the above issue.
The test case in [Link] can reproduce the above issue with 64k block size.
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/fstests/list/?series=804003
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # 6.4
Fixes: 93cdf49f6e ("ext4: Fix best extent lstart adjustment logic in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa()")
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231127063313.3734294-1-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Here are prepared work:
1. Include mballoc-test.c to mballoc.c to be able test static function
in mballoc.c.
2. Implement static stub to avoid read IO to disk.
3. Construct fake super_block. Only partial members are set, more members
will be set when more functions are tested.
Then unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple is added.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928160407.142069-12-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Multiblocks allocation will read and write block bitmap and group
descriptor which reside on disk. Add kunit stub to function
ext4_get_group_desc, ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait, ext4_wait_block_bitmap
and ext4_mb_mark_context to avoid real IO to disk.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928160407.142069-11-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch separates block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in order to
update block bitmap with ext4_mb_mark_context in following patch.
The reason why this can be sperated is explained in previous submit.
Put the explanation here to simplify the code archeology to
ext4_group_add_blocks():
Separated freeing is safe with concurrent allocation as long as:
1. Firstly allocate block in buddy bitmap, and then in block bitmap.
2. Firstly free block in block bitmap, and then buddy bitmap.
Then freed block will only be available to allocation when both buddy
bitmap and block bitmap are updated by freeing.
Allocation obeys rule 1 already, just do sperated freeing with rule 2.
Separated freeing has no race with generate_buddy as:
Once ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp is executed successfully, the update-to-date
buddy page can be found in sbi->s_buddy_cache and no more buddy
initialization of the buddy page will be executed concurrently until
buddy page is unloaded. As we always do free in "load buddy, free,
unload buddy" sequence, separated freeing has no race with generate_buddy.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928160407.142069-9-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch separates block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in order to
update block bitmap with ext4_mb_mark_context in following patch.
Separated freeing is safe with concurrent allocation as long as:
1. Firstly allocate block in buddy bitmap, and then in block bitmap.
2. Firstly free block in block bitmap, and then buddy bitmap.
Then freed block will only be available to allocation when both buddy
bitmap and block bitmap are updated by freeing.
Allocation obeys rule 1 already, just do sperated freeing with rule 2.
Separated freeing has no race with generate_buddy as:
Once ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp is executed successfully, the update-to-date
buddy page can be found in sbi->s_buddy_cache and no more buddy
initialization of the buddy page will be executed concurrently until
buddy page is unloaded. As we always do free in "load buddy, free,
unload buddy" sequence, separated freeing has no race with generate_buddy.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928160407.142069-7-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used to:
1. Remove repeat code to normally update bitmap and group descriptor
on disk.
2. Now that we have a common API for marking blocks inuse/free in block
bitmap, use that instead of open coding it in function
ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(). The current code was not updating
checksum and other counters. ext4_mb_mark_context() should fix these
consistency problems.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928160407.142069-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Previously, ext4_mb_mark_context is only called under fast commit
replay path, so there is no valid handle when we update block bitmap
and group descriptor. This patch try to extend ext4_mb_mark_context
to be used by code under journal. There are several improvement:
1. Add "handle_t *handle" to struct ext4_mark_context to journal block
bitmap and group descriptor update inside ext4_mb_mark_context (the
added journal code is based on ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used where
ext4_mb_mark_context is going to be used.)
2. Adds a flag argument to ext4_mb_mark_context() which controls
a. EXT4_MB_BITMAP_MARKED_CHECK - whether block bitmap checking is needed.
b. EXT4_MB_SYNC_UPDATE - whether dirty buffers (bitmap and group
descriptor) needs sync.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928160407.142069-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
There are several reasons to add a general function ext4_mb_mark_context
to update block bitmap and group descriptor on disk:
1. pair behavior of alloc/free bits. For example,
ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple will update free_clusters in struct flex_groups
in ext4_mb_mark_bb while ext4_free_blocks_simple forgets this.
2. remove repeat code to read from disk, update and write back to disk.
3. reduce future unit test mocks to catch real IO to update structure
on disk.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928160407.142069-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Commit 7a2fcbf7f8 ("ext4: don't use blocks freed but not yet committed in
buddy cache init") added a code to mark as used blocks in the list of not yet
committed freed blocks during initialization of a buddy page. However
ext4_mb_free_metadata() makes sure buddy page is already loaded and takes a
reference to it so it cannot happen that ext4_mb_init_cache() is called
when efd list is non-empty. Just remove the
ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist() call.
Fixes: 7a2fcbf7f85('ext4: don't use blocks freed but not yet committed in buddy cache init')
Signed-off-by: Wang Jianjian <wangjianjian0@foxmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_53CBCB1668358AE862684E453DF37B722008@qq.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
When releasing space in jbd, we traverse s_freed_data_list to get the
free range belonging to the current commit transaction. In extreme cases,
the time spent may not be small, and we have observed cases exceeding
10ms. This patch makes running and commit transactions manage their own
free_data_list respectively, eliminating unnecessary traversal.
And in the callback phase of the commit transaction, no one will touch
it except the jbd thread itself, so s_md_lock is no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230612124017.14115-1-hanjinke.666@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Len Brown has reported that system suspend sometimes fail due to
inability to freeze a task working in ext4_trim_fs() for one minute.
Trimming a large filesystem on a disk that slowly processes discard
requests can indeed take a long time. Since discard is just an advisory
call, it is perfectly fine to interrupt it at any time and the return
number of discarded blocks until that moment. Do that when we detect the
task is being frozen.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216322
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913150504.9054-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently we set the group's trimmed bit in ext4_trim_all_free() based
on return value of ext4_try_to_trim_range(). However when we will want
to abort trimming because of suspend attempt, we want to return success
from ext4_try_to_trim_range() but not set the trimmed bit. Instead
implementing awkward propagation of this information, just move setting
of trimmed bit into ext4_try_to_trim_range() when the whole group is
trimmed.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913150504.9054-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
clang's static analysis warning: fs/ext4/mballoc.c
line 4178, column 6, Branch condition evaluates to a garbage value.
err is uninitialized and will be judged when 'len <= 0' or
it first enters the loop while the condition "!ext4_sb_block_valid()"
is true. Although this can't make problems now, it's better to
correct it.
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@nfschina.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230725043310.1227621-1-suhui@nfschina.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The return value type of i_blocksize() is 'unsigned int', so the
type of blocksize has been modified from 'int' to 'unsigned int'
to ensure data type consistency.
Signed-off-by: Lu Hongfei <luhongfei@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230707105516.9156-1-luhongfei@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Using CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN only make sense for regular files, as for
non-regular files we never normalize the allocation request length i.e.
goal len is same as original length (ac_g_ex.fe_len == ac_o_ex.fe_len).
Hence there is no scope of trimming the goal length to make it
satisfy original request len. Thus this patch avoids using
CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN criteria for non-regular files request.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 33122aa930f1 ("ext4: Add allocation criteria 1.5 (CR1_5)")
Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2a694c748ff8b8c4b416995a24f06f07b55047a8.1689516047.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We named criteria with CR_XXX, correct stale comment to criteria with
raw number.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-11-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Return good group when it's found in loop to remove futher check if good
group is found after loop.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-10-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Return good group when it's found in loop to remove futher check if good
group is found after loop.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-9-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Replace the traditional ternary conditional operator with with max()/min()
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-7-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The return at end of void function is unnecessary, just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801143204.2284343-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
