Commit Graph

16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kees Cook 7d78a77733 string: Add additional __realloc_size() annotations for "dup" helpers
Several other "dup"-style interfaces could use the __realloc_size()
attribute. (As a reminder to myself and others: "realloc" is used here
instead of "alloc" because the "alloc_size" attribute implies that the
memory contents are uninitialized. Since we're copying contents into the
resulting allocation, it must use "realloc_size" to avoid confusing the
compiler's optimization passes.)

Add KUnit test coverage where possible. (KUnit still does not have the
ability to manipulate userspace memory.)

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240502145218.it.729-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2024-05-02 07:52:41 -07:00
Kees Cook 74df22453c kunit/fortify: Fix replaced failure path to unbreak __alloc_size
The __alloc_size annotation for kmemdup() was getting disabled under
KUnit testing because the replaced fortify_panic macro implementation
was using "return NULL" as a way to survive the sanity checking. But
having the chance to return NULL invalidated __alloc_size, so kmemdup
was not passing the __builtin_dynamic_object_size() tests any more:

[23:26:18] [PASSED] fortify_test_alloc_size_kmalloc_const
[23:26:19]     # fortify_test_alloc_size_kmalloc_dynamic: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/fortify_kunit.c:265
[23:26:19]     Expected __builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 1) == expected, but
[23:26:19]         __builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 1) == -1 (0xffffffffffffffff)
[23:26:19]         expected == 11 (0xb)
[23:26:19] __alloc_size() not working with __bdos on kmemdup("hello there", len, gfp)
[23:26:19] [FAILED] fortify_test_alloc_size_kmalloc_dynamic

Normal builds were not affected: __alloc_size continued to work there.

Use a zero-sized allocation instead, which allows __alloc_size to
behave.

Fixes: 4ce615e798 ("fortify: Provide KUnit counters for failure testing")
Fixes: fa4a3f86d4 ("fortify: Add KUnit tests for runtime overflows")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240501232937.work.532-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2024-05-01 16:35:06 -07:00
Kees Cook 26f812ba75 kunit/fortify: Add memcpy() tests
Add fortify tests for memcpy() and memmove(). This can use a similar
method to the fortify_panic() replacement, only we can do it for what
was the WARN_ONCE(), which can be redefined.

Since this is primarily testing the fortify behaviors of the memcpy()
and memmove() defenses, the tests for memcpy() and memmove() are
identical.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429194342.2421639-3-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2024-04-30 10:34:30 -07:00
Kees Cook 091f79e8de kunit/fortify: Do not spam logs with fortify WARNs
When running KUnit fortify tests, we're already doing precise tracking
of which warnings are getting hit. Don't fill the logs with WARNs unless
we've been explicitly built with DEBUG enabled.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429194342.2421639-2-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2024-04-30 10:34:29 -07:00
Kees Cook a0d6677ec3 kunit/fortify: Rename tests to use recommended conventions
The recommended conventions for KUnit tests is ${module}_test_${what}.
Adjust the fortify tests to match.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429194342.2421639-1-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2024-04-30 10:34:29 -07:00
Kees Cook 998b18072c kunit/fortify: Fix mismatched kvalloc()/vfree() usage
The kv*() family of tests were accidentally freeing with vfree() instead
of kvfree(). Use kvfree() instead.

Fixes: 9124a26401 ("kunit/fortify: Validate __alloc_size attribute results")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240425230619.work.299-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2024-04-26 15:31:39 -07:00
Kees Cook 3d965b33e4 fortify: Improve buffer overflow reporting
Improve the reporting of buffer overflows under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE to
help accelerate debugging efforts. The calculations are all just sitting
in registers anyway, so pass them along to the function to be reported.

For example, before:

  detected buffer overflow in memcpy

and after:

  memcpy: detected buffer overflow: 4096 byte read of buffer size 1

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407192717.636137-10-keescook@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2024-02-29 13:38:02 -08:00
Kees Cook fa4a3f86d4 fortify: Add KUnit tests for runtime overflows
With fortify overflows able to be redirected, we can use KUnit to
exercise the overflow conditions. Add tests for every API covered by
CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, except for memset() and memcpy(), which are
special-cased for now.

Disable warnings in the Makefile since we're explicitly testing
known-bad string handling code patterns.

Note that this makes the LKDTM FORTIFY_STR* tests obsolete, but those
can be removed separately.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2024-02-29 13:38:02 -08:00
Kees Cook 4ce615e798 fortify: Provide KUnit counters for failure testing
The standard C string APIs were not designed to have a failure mode;
they were expected to always succeed without memory safety issues.
Normally, CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE will use fortify_panic() to stop
processing, as truncating a read or write may provide an even worse
system state. However, this creates a problem for testing under things
like KUnit, which needs a way to survive failures.

When building with CONFIG_KUNIT, provide a failure path for all users
of fortify_panic, and track whether the failure was a read overflow or
a write overflow, for KUnit tests to examine. Inspired by similar logic
in the slab tests.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2024-02-29 13:38:02 -08:00
Kees Cook 1a78f8cb5d fortify: Allow KUnit test to build without FORTIFY
In order for CI systems to notice all the skipped tests related to
CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, allow the FORTIFY_SOURCE KUnit tests to build
with or without CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2024-02-29 13:38:02 -08:00
davidgow@google.com 46ee8f688e fortify: test: Use kunit_device
Using struct root_device to create fake devices for tests is something
of a hack. The new struct kunit_device is meant for this purpose, so use
it instead.

Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-18 13:28:08 -07:00
Kees Cook 5e2956ee46 Revert "fortify: Allow KUnit test to build without FORTIFY"
This reverts commit a9dc8d0442.

The standard for KUnit is to not build tests at all when required
functionality is missing, rather than doing test "skip". Restore this
for the fortify tests, so that architectures without
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_FORTIFY_SOURCE do not emit unsolvable warnings.

Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMuHMdUrxOEroHVUt7-mAnKSBjY=a-D3jr+XiAifuwv06Ob9Pw@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2023-07-03 12:50:26 -07:00
Kees Cook a9dc8d0442 fortify: Allow KUnit test to build without FORTIFY
In order for CI systems to notice all the skipped tests related to
CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, allow the FORTIFY_SOURCE KUnit tests to build
with or without CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2023-05-16 14:07:49 -07:00
Kees Cook 9124a26401 kunit/fortify: Validate __alloc_size attribute results
Validate the effect of the __alloc_size attribute on allocators. If the
compiler doesn't support __builtin_dynamic_object_size(), skip the
associated tests.

(For GCC, just remove the "--make_options" line below...)

$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 \
        --kconfig_add CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y \
	--make_options LLVM=1
        fortify
...
[15:16:30] ================== fortify (10 subtests) ===================
[15:16:30] [PASSED] known_sizes_test
[15:16:30] [PASSED] control_flow_split_test
[15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_kmalloc_const_test
[15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_kmalloc_dynamic_test
[15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_vmalloc_const_test
[15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_vmalloc_dynamic_test
[15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_kvmalloc_const_test
[15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_kvmalloc_dynamic_test
[15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_devm_kmalloc_const_test
[15:16:30] [PASSED] alloc_size_devm_kmalloc_dynamic_test
[15:16:30] ===================== [PASSED] fortify =====================
[15:16:30] ============================================================
[15:16:30] Testing complete. Ran 10 tests: passed: 10
[15:16:31] Elapsed time: 8.348s total, 0.002s configuring, 6.923s building, 1.075s running

For earlier GCC prior to version 12, the dynamic tests will be skipped:

[15:18:59] ================== fortify (10 subtests) ===================
[15:18:59] [PASSED] known_sizes_test
[15:18:59] [PASSED] control_flow_split_test
[15:18:59] [PASSED] alloc_size_kmalloc_const_test
[15:18:59] [SKIPPED] alloc_size_kmalloc_dynamic_test
[15:18:59] [PASSED] alloc_size_vmalloc_const_test
[15:18:59] [SKIPPED] alloc_size_vmalloc_dynamic_test
[15:18:59] [PASSED] alloc_size_kvmalloc_const_test
[15:18:59] [SKIPPED] alloc_size_kvmalloc_dynamic_test
[15:18:59] [PASSED] alloc_size_devm_kmalloc_const_test
[15:18:59] [SKIPPED] alloc_size_devm_kmalloc_dynamic_test
[15:18:59] ===================== [PASSED] fortify =====================
[15:18:59] ============================================================
[15:18:59] Testing complete. Ran 10 tests: passed: 6, skipped: 4
[15:18:59] Elapsed time: 11.965s total, 0.002s configuring, 10.540s building, 1.068s running

Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2022-11-22 21:08:28 -08:00
Kees Cook 06c1c49d0c fortify: Adjust KUnit test for modular build
A much better "unknown size" string pointer is available directly from
struct test, so use that instead of a global that isn't shared with
modules.

Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YyCOHOchVuE/E7vS@dev-arch.thelio-3990X
Fixes: 875bfd5276 ("fortify: Add KUnit test for FORTIFY_SOURCE internals")
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Build-tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2022-09-14 07:04:15 -07:00
Kees Cook 875bfd5276 fortify: Add KUnit test for FORTIFY_SOURCE internals
Add lib/fortify_kunit.c KUnit test for checking the expected behavioral
characteristics of FORTIFY_SOURCE internals.

Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2022-09-07 16:37:26 -07:00