There will be a second mb_cache instance that tracks ea_inodes. Make
existing names more explicit so that it is clear that they refer to
xattr block cache.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Make names more generic so that mbcache usage is not limited to
block sharing. In a subsequent patch in the series
("ext4: xattr inode deduplication"), we start using the mbcache code
for sharing xattr inodes. With that patch, old mb_cache_entry.e_block
field could be holding either a block number or an inode number.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Tracking struct inode * rather than the inode number eliminates the
repeated ext4_xattr_inode_iget() call later. The second call cannot
fail in practice but still requires explanation when it wants to ignore
the return value. Avoid the trouble and make things simple.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Both ext4_set_acl() and ext4_set_context() need to be made aware of
ea_inode feature when it comes to credits calculation.
Also add a sufficient credits check in ext4_xattr_set_handle() right
after xattr write lock is grabbed. Original credits calculation is done
outside the lock so there is a possiblity that the initially calculated
credits are not sufficient anymore.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In a few places the function returns without trying to pass the actual
error code to the caller. Fix those.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When value size is <= EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(), and it
doesn't fit in either inline or xattr block, a second try is made to
store it in an external inode while storing the entry itself in inline
area. There should also be an attempt to store the entry in xattr block.
This patch adds a retry loop to do that. It also makes the caller the
sole decider on whether to store a value in an external inode.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When there is no space for a value in xattr block, it may be stored
in an xattr inode even if the value length is less than
EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(). So the current assumption in credits
calculation is wrong.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When a xattr entry refers to an external inode, the value data is not
available in the inline area so we should not attempt to read it using
value offset.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When moving xattr entries from inline area to a xattr block, entries
that refer to external xattr inodes need special handling because
value data is not available in the inline area but rather should be
read from its external inode.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_xattr_make_inode_space() is interested in calculating the inline
space used in an inode. When a xattr entry refers to an external inode
the value size indicates the external inode size, not the value size in
the inline area. Change the function to take this into account.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_xattr_value_same() is used as a quick optimization in case the new
xattr value is identical to the previous value. When xattr value is
stored in a xattr inode the check becomes expensive so it is better to
just assume that they are not equal.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Two places in code missed converting xattr inode number using
le32_to_cpu().
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The input and output values of *size parameter are equal on successful
return from ext4_xattr_inode_get(). On error return, the callers ignore
the output value so there is no need to update it.
Also check for NULL return from ext4_bread(). If the actual xattr inode
size happens to be smaller than the expected size, ext4_bread() may
return NULL which would indicate data corruption.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In general, kernel functions indicate success/failure through their return
values. This function returns the status as an output parameter and reserves
the return value for the inode. Make it follow the general convention.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The ref count on ea_inode is incremented by
ext4_xattr_inode_orphan_add() which is supposed to be decremented by
ext4_xattr_inode_array_free(). The decrement is conditioned on whether
the ea_inode is currently on the orphan list. However, the orphan list
addition only happens when journaling is enabled. In non-journaled case,r
we fail to release the ref count causing an error message like below.
"VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of sdb. Self-destruct in 5 seconds.
Have a nice day..."
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Quota charging is based on the ownership of the inode. Currently, the
xattr inode owner is set to the caller which may be different from the
parent inode owner. This is inconsistent with how quota is charged for
xattr block and regular data block writes.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We don't need acls on xattr inodes because they are not directly
accessible from user mode.
Besides lockdep complains about recursive locking of xattr_sem as seen
below.
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
4.11.0-rc8+ #402 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
python/1894 is trying to acquire lock:
(&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804878a6>] ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270
but task is already holding lock:
(&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by python/1894:
#0: (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d829f>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
#1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803dda27>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
#2: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 1894 Comm: python Not tainted 4.11.0-rc8+ #402
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x67/0x99
__lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1830
lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0
down_read+0x2f/0x60
ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270
ext4_get_acl+0x43/0x1e0
get_acl+0x72/0xf0
posix_acl_create+0x5e/0x170
ext4_init_acl+0x21/0xc0
__ext4_new_inode+0xffd/0x16b0
ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x5ea/0xb70
ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b5/0x970
ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x351/0x5d0
ext4_xattr_set+0x124/0x180
ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
__vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
setxattr+0x129/0x160
path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Setting a large xattr value may require writing the attribute contents
to an external inode. In this case we may need to lock the xattr inode
along with the parent inode. This doesn't pose a deadlock risk because
xattr inodes are not directly visible to the user and their access is
restricted.
Assign a lockdep subclass to xattr inode's lock.
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
4.12.0-rc1+ #740 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
python/1822 is trying to acquire lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff804912ca>] ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0
but task is already holding lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by python/1822:
#0: (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d0eef>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
#1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
#2: (jbd2_handle){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff80493f40>] start_this_handle+0xf0/0x420
#3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804920ba>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x9a/0x4f0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 1822 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #740
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x67/0x9e
__lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1750
lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0
down_write+0x2c/0x60
ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0
ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b2/0x9b0
ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x322/0x4f0
ext4_xattr_set+0x144/0x1a0
ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
__vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
setxattr+0x12e/0x150
path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Large xattr support is implemented for EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EA_INODE.
If the size of an xattr value is larger than will fit in a single
external block, then the xattr value will be saved into the body
of an external xattr inode.
The also helps support a larger number of xattr, since only the headers
will be stored in the in-inode space or the single external block.
The inode is referenced from the xattr header via "e_value_inum",
which was formerly "e_value_block", but that field was never used.
The e_value_size still contains the xattr size so that listing
xattrs does not need to look up the inode if the data is not accessed.
struct ext4_xattr_entry {
__u8 e_name_len; /* length of name */
__u8 e_name_index; /* attribute name index */
__le16 e_value_offs; /* offset in disk block of value */
__le32 e_value_inum; /* inode in which value is stored */
__le32 e_value_size; /* size of attribute value */
__le32 e_hash; /* hash value of name and value */
char e_name[0]; /* attribute name */
};
The xattr inode is marked with the EXT4_EA_INODE_FL flag and also
holds a back-reference to the owning inode in its i_mtime field,
allowing the ext4/e2fsck to verify the correct inode is accessed.
[ Applied fix by Dan Carpenter to avoid freeing an ERR_PTR. ]
Lustre-Jira: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-80
Lustre-bugzilla: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4424
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak.shah@sun.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
ext4_xattr_block_set() calls dquot_alloc_block() to charge for an xattr
block when new references are made. However if dquot_initialize() hasn't
been called on an inode, request for charging is effectively ignored
because ext4_inode_info->i_dquot is not initialized yet.
Add dquot_initialize() to call paths that lead to ext4_xattr_block_set().
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
ext4_xattr_check_entry() was redundant with validation of the full xattr
entries list in ext4_xattr_check_entries(), which all callers also did.
ext4_xattr_check_entry() also didn't actually do correct validation;
specifically, it never checked that the value doesn't overlap the xattr
names, nor did it account for padding when checking whether the xattr
value overflows the available space. So remove it to eliminate any
potential confusion.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_xattr_check_names() actually validates both the xattr names and
values, not just the names. So rename it to ext4_xattr_check_entries()
to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
There's no difference between ext4_xattr_list() and ext4_listxattr(), so
merge them together and just have ext4_listxattr(). Some years ago they
took different arguments, but that's no longer the case.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Constify static data in ext4 that is never (intentionally) modified so
that it is placed in .rodata and benefits from memory protection.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We must lock the xattr block before calculating or verifying the
checksum in order to avoid spurious checksum failures.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193661
Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
It was possible for an xattr value to have a very large size, which
would then pass validation on 32-bit architectures due to a pointer
wraparound. Fix this by validating the size in a way which avoids
pointer wraparound.
It was also possible that a value's size would fit in the available
space but its padded size would not. This would cause an out-of-bounds
memory write in ext4_xattr_set_entry when replacing the xattr value.
For example, if an xattr value of unpadded size 253 bytes went until the
very end of the inode or block, then using setxattr(2) to replace this
xattr's value with 256 bytes would cause a write to the 3 bytes past the
end of the inode or buffer, and the new xattr value would be incorrectly
truncated. Fix this by requiring that the padded size fit in the
available space rather than the unpadded size.
This patch shouldn't have any noticeable effect on
non-corrupted/non-malicious filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
With i_extra_isize equal to or close to the available space, it was
possible for us to read past the end of the inode when trying to detect
or validate in-inode xattrs. Fix this by checking for the needed extra
space first.
This patch shouldn't have any noticeable effect on
non-corrupted/non-malicious filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
CURRENT_TIME_SEC and CURRENT_TIME are not y2038 safe.
current_time() will be transitioned to be y2038 safe
along with vfs.
current_time() returns timestamps according to the
granularities set in the super_block.
The granularity check in ext4_current_time() to call
current_time() or CURRENT_TIME_SEC is not required.
Use current_time() directly to obtain timestamps
unconditionally, and remove ext4_current_time().
Quota files are assumed to be on the same filesystem.
Hence, use current_time() for these files as well.
Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Recent commits require line continuing printks to always use
pr_cont or KERN_CONT. Add these markings to a few more printks.
Miscellaneaous:
o Integrate the ea_idebug and ea_bdebug macros to use a single
call to printk(KERN_DEBUG instead of 3 separate printks
o Use the more common varargs macro style
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
It should be cpu_to_le32(), not le32_to_cpu(). No change in behavior.
Found with sparse, and this was the only endianness warning in fs/ext4/.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Move loop to make enough space in the inode from
ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() into a separate function to make that
function smaller and better readable and also to avoid delaration of
variables inside a loop block.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
'start' variable is completely unused in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea().
Variable 'first' is used only once in one place. So just remove them.
Variables 'entry' and 'last' are only really used later in the function
inside a loop. Move their declarations there.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Factor out function for moving xattrs from inode into external xattr
block from ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea(). That function is already quite
long and factoring out this rather standalone functionality helps
readability.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We were checking whether computed offsets do not exceed end of block in
ext4_xattr_shift_entries(). However this does not make sense since we
always only decrease offsets. So replace that assertion with a check
whether we really decrease xattrs value offsets.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently we don't support xattrs with e_value_block set. We don't allow
them to pass initial xattr check so there's no point for checking for
this later. Since these tests were untested, bugs were creeping in and
not all places which should have checked were checking e_value_block
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently we don't support xattrs with values stored out of line. Check
for that in ext4_xattr_check_names() to make sure we never work with
such xattrs since not all the code counts with that resulting is possible
weird corruption issues.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Conditions checking whether there is enough free space in an xattr block
and when xattr is large enough to make enough space in the inode forgot
to account for the fact that inode need not be completely filled up with
xattrs. Thus we could move unnecessarily many xattrs out of inode or
even falsely claim there is not enough space to expand the inode. We
also forgot to update the amount of free space in xattr block when moving
more xattrs and thus could decide to move too big xattr resulting in
unexpected failure.
Fix these problems by properly updating free space in the inode and
xattr block as we move xattrs. To simplify the math, avoid shifting
xattrs after removing each one xattr and instead just shift xattrs only
once there is enough free space in the inode.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When we need to move xattrs into external xattr block, we call
ext4_xattr_block_set() from ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea(). That may end
up calling ext4_mark_inode_dirty() again which will recurse back into
the inode expansion code leading to deadlocks.
Protect from recursion using EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND inode flag and move
its management into ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() since its manipulation
is safe there (due to xattr_sem) from possible races with
ext4_xattr_set_handle() which plays with it as well.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We did not count with the padding of xattr value when computing desired
shift of xattrs in the inode when expanding i_extra_isize. As a result
we could create unaligned start of inline xattrs. Account for alignment
properly.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x-
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
When multiple xattrs need to be moved out of inode, we did not properly
recompute total size of xattr headers in the inode and the new header
position. Thus when moving the second and further xattr we asked
ext4_xattr_shift_entries() to move too much and from the wrong place,
resulting in possible xattr value corruption or general memory
corruption.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The code in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() treated new_extra_isize
argument sometimes as the desired target i_extra_isize and sometimes as
the amount by which we need to grow current i_extra_isize. These happen
to coincide when i_extra_isize is 0 which used to be the common case and
so nobody noticed this until recently when we added i_projid to the
inode and so i_extra_isize now needs to grow from 28 to 32 bytes.
The result of these bugs was that we sometimes unnecessarily decided to
move xattrs out of inode even if there was enough space and we often
ended up corrupting in-inode xattrs because arguments to
ext4_xattr_shift_entries() were just wrong. This could demonstrate
itself as BUG_ON in ext4_xattr_shift_entries() triggering.
Fix the problem by introducing new isize_diff variable and use it where
appropriate.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x
Reported-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We temporally change checksum fields in buffers of some types of
metadata into '0' for verifying the checksum values. By doing this
without locking the buffer, some metadata's checksums, which are
being committed or written back to the storage, could be damaged.
In our test, several metadata blocks were found with damaged metadata
checksum value during recovery process. When we only verify the
checksum value, we have to avoid modifying checksum fields directly.
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Youngjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
We aren't checking to see if the in-inode extended attribute is
corrupted before we try to expand the inode's extra isize fields.
This can lead to potential crashes caused by the BUG_ON() check in
ext4_xattr_shift_entries().
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To reduce amount of damage caused by single bad block, we limit number
of inodes sharing an xattr block to 1024. Thus there can be more xattr
blocks with the same contents when there are lots of files with the same
extended attributes. These xattr blocks naturally result in hash
collisions and can form long hash chains and we unnecessarily check each
such block only to find out we cannot use it because it is already
shared by too many inodes.
Add a reusable flag to cache entries which is cleared when a cache entry
has reached its maximum refcount. Cache entries which are not marked
reusable are skipped by mb_cache_entry_find_{first,next}. This
significantly speeds up mbcache when there are many same xattr blocks.
For example for xattr-bench with 5 values and each process handling
20000 files, the run for 64 processes is 25x faster with this patch.
Even for 8 processes the speedup is almost 3x. We have also verified
that for situations where there is only one xattr block of each kind,
the patch doesn't have a measurable cost.
[JK: Remove handling of setting the same value since it is not needed
anymore, check for races in e_reusable setting, improve changelog,
add measurements]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When someone tried to set xattr to the same value (i.e., not changing
anything) we did all the work of removing original xattr, possibly
breaking references to shared xattr block, inserting new xattr, and
merging xattr blocks again. Since this is not so rare operation and it
is relatively cheap for us to detect this case, check for this and
shortcut xattr setting in that case.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Tahsin Erdogan