[ Upstream commit 50a9b7fc15 ]
All of these mutexes are already initialized by the display side since
commit 3fef3e6ff8 ("drm/i915: move display mutex inits to display
code"), so the xe shouldn´t initialize them.
Fixes: 44e694958b ("drm/xe/display: Implement display support")
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240405200711.2041428-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 117de185ed)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
intel_power_domains_init is called twice in xe_device_probe:
1) intel_power_domains_init()
xe_display_init_nommio()
xe_device_probe()
2) intel_power_domains_init()
intel_display_driver_probe_noirq()
xe_display_init_noirq()
xe_device_probe()
It needs remove one to avoid power_domains->power_wells double malloc.
unreferenced object 0xffff88811150ee00 (size 512):
comm "systemd-udevd", pid 506, jiffies 4294674198 (age 3605.560s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
10 b4 9d a0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff8134b901>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1c1/0x2b0
[<ffffffff812c98b2>] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150
[<ffffffffa08b0033>] __set_power_wells+0xc3/0x360 [xe]
[<ffffffffa08562fc>] xe_display_init_nommio+0x4c/0x70 [xe]
[<ffffffffa07f0d1c>] xe_device_probe+0x3c/0x5a0 [xe]
[<ffffffffa082e48f>] xe_pci_probe+0x33f/0x5a0 [xe]
[<ffffffff817f2187>] local_pci_probe+0x47/0xa0
[<ffffffff817f3db3>] pci_device_probe+0xc3/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8192f2a2>] really_probe+0x1a2/0x410
[<ffffffff8192f598>] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x160
[<ffffffff8192f6ae>] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90
[<ffffffff8192f92a>] __driver_attach+0xda/0x1d0
[<ffffffff8192c95c>] bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd0
[<ffffffff8192e159>] bus_add_driver+0x119/0x220
[<ffffffff81930d00>] driver_register+0x60/0x120
[<ffffffffa05e50a0>] 0xffffffffa05e50a0
The call to intel_power_domains_cleanup() needs to stay where it is for
now. The main issue is that while the init is called by the display
side, shared by i915 and xe, the cleanup is called by a non-shared code
path. Fixing that will be done as a separate commit.
Fixes: 44e694958b ("drm/xe/display: Implement display support")
Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Wang <xiaoming.wang@intel.com>
[ reword commit message and explain why the fini needs to stay
where it is ]
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240202215658.561298-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 86c99abb5f)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Encapsulate all the module parameters in one single global struct
variable. This also removes the extra xe_module.h from includes.
v2: naming consistency as suggested by Jani and Lucas
v3: fix checkpatch errors/warnings
v4: adding blank line after struct declaration
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bommithi Sakeena <bommithi.sakeena@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
This fixes the build error below with CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c:334:23: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_target_system_state’; did you mean ‘acpi_get_system_info’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
334 | bool s2idle = acpi_target_system_state() < ACPI_STATE_S3;
Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We accidentally always pass true as s2idle argument, instead of
calculating it in the same way as i915.
Suspend modes were removed to achieve compatibility with i915, but
accidentally left in the source code.
While at it, fix all other cases too, s2idle will go into a D1 state and
setting a lower power state should be handled by PCI core.
Maybe my laptop stops draining so much power during suspend now? I can
only hope..
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
As for display, the intent is to share the display code with the i915
driver so that there is maximum reuse there.
We do this by recompiling i915/display code twice.
Now that i915 has been adapted to support the Xe build, we can add
the xe/display support.
This initial work is a collaboration of many people and unfortunately
this squashed patch won't fully honor the proper credits.
But let's try to add a few from the squashed patches:
Co-developed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Co-developed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Lucas De Marchi