The driver core ignores the return value of this callback because there
is only little it can do when a device disappears.
This is the final bit of a long lasting cleanup quest where several
buses were converted to also return void from their remove callback.
Additionally some resource leaks were fixed that were caused by drivers
returning an error code in the expectation that the driver won't go
away.
With struct bus_type::remove returning void it's prevented that newly
implemented buses return an ignored error code and so don't anticipate
wrong expectations for driver authors.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> (For fpga)
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> (For drivers/s390 and drivers/vfio)
Acked-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> (For ARM, Amba and related parts)
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> (for sunxi-rsb)
Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> (for media)
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> (For drivers/platform)
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> (For xen)
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> (For mfd)
Acked-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org> (For mcb)
Acked-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> (For slimbus)
Acked-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> (For vfio)
Acked-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> (For ulpi and typec)
Acked-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com> (For ipack)
Acked-by: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org> (For ps3)
Acked-by: Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com> (For thunderbolt)
Acked-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> (For intel_th)
Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> (For pcmcia)
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> (For ACPI)
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> (rpmsg and apr)
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> (For intel-ish-hid)
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> (For CXL, DAX, and NVDIMM)
Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> (For isa)
Acked-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (For firewire)
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> (For hid)
Acked-by: Thorsten Scherer <t.scherer@eckelmann.de> (For siox)
Acked-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com> (For anybuss)
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> (For MMC)
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> # for I2C
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210713193522.1770306-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The bus probe callback calls the driver callback without further
checking. Better be safe than sorry and refuse registration of a driver
without a probe function to prevent a NULL pointer exception.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624095059.4010157-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Fixes: 933c504424 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add scmi protocol bus to enumerate protocol devices")
Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
When the driver core calls the probe callback it already checked that
the devices match, so there is no need to call the match callback again.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624095059.4010157-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Suggested-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Having added the support for SCMI protocols as modules in order to let
vendors extend the SCMI core with their own additions it seems odd to
then force SCMI drivers built on top to use a static device table to
declare their devices since this way any new SCMI drivers addition
would need the core SCMI device table to be updated too.
Remove the static core device table and let SCMI drivers to simply declare
which device/protocol pair they need at initialization time: the core will
then take care to generate such devices dynamically during platform
initialization or at module loading time, as long as the requested
underlying protocol is defined in the devicetree.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-39-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Extend SCMI protocols accounting mechanism to address possible module
usage and add the support to possibly define new protocols as loadable
modules.
Keep the standard protocols built into the SCMI core.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-38-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Now that all protocols and drivers have been ported to the new interface
based on protocol handles and get/put operations, remove all the legacy
transient initialization code.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-33-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Extend common protocol registration routines and provide some new generic
protocols get/put helpers that can track protocols usage and automatically
perform the proper initialization and de-initialization on demand when
required.
Convert all standard protocols to use this new registration scheme while
keeping them all still using the usual initialization logic bound to SCMI
devices probing.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
In preparation to enable building scmi as a single module, let us move
the scmi bus {de-,}initialisation call into the driver.
The main reason for this is to keep it simple instead of maintaining
it as separate modules and dealing with all possible initcall races
and deferred probe handling. We can move it as separate modules if
needed in future.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200907195046.56615-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The scmi bus now supports adding multiple devices per protocol,
and since scmi_protocol_init is called for each scmi device created,
we must avoid allocating protocol private data and initialising the
protocol itself if it is already initialised.
In order to achieve the same, we can simple replace the idr pointer
from protocol initialisation function to a dummy function.
Suggested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Currently only one scmi device is created for each protocol enumerated.
However, there is requirement to make use of some procotols by multiple
kernel subsystems/frameworks. One such example is SCMI PERFORMANCE
protocol which can be used by both cpufreq and devfreq drivers.
Similarly, SENSOR protocol may be used by hwmon and iio subsystems,
and POWER protocol may be used by genpd and regulator drivers.
In order to achieve that, let us extend the scmi bus to match based
not only protocol id but also the scmi device name if one is available.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
If device_register() fails, both put_device() and kfree() are called,
ending with a double free of the scmi_dev.
Calling kfree() is needed only when a failure happens between the
allocation of the scmi_dev and its registration, so move it to there
and remove it from the error flow.
Fixes: 46edb8d132 ("firmware: arm_scmi: provide the mandatory device release callback")
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The device/driver model clearly mandates that bus driver that discover
and allocate the device must set the release callback. This callback
will be used to free the device after all references have gone away.
scmi bus driver is missing the obvious callback which will result in
the following warning if the device is unregistered:
Device 'scmi_dev.1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and
must be fixed. See Documentation/kobject.txt.
WARNING at drivers/base/core.c:922 device_release+0x8c/0xa0
Hardware name: ARM LTD Juno Development Platform BIOS EDK II Jan 21 2019
Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : device_release+0x8c/0xa0
lr : device_release+0x8c/0xa0
Call trace:
device_release+0x8c/0xa0
kobject_put+0x8c/0x208
device_unregister+0x30/0x78
scmi_device_destroy+0x28/0x50
scmi_probe+0x354/0x5b0
platform_drv_probe+0x58/0xa8
really_probe+0x2c4/0x3e8
driver_probe_device+0x12c/0x148
__device_attach_driver+0xac/0x150
bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xd8
__device_attach+0xe0/0x168
device_initial_probe+0x24/0x30
bus_probe_device+0xa0/0xa8
deferred_probe_work_func+0x8c/0xe0
process_one_work+0x1f0/0x478
worker_thread+0x22c/0x450
kthread+0x134/0x138
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
---[ end trace 420bdb7f6af50937 ]---
Fix the issue by providing scmi_device_release callback. We have
everything required for device release already in scmi_device_destroy,
so we just need to move freeing of the device to scmi_device_release.
Fixes: 933c504424 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add scmi protocol bus to enumerate protocol devices")
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.17+
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The existing code intends the good path to reduce the code which is so
uncommon. It's obvious to have more readable code with a goto used for
the error path. This patch adds more appropriate error paths and makes
code more readable. It also moves a error logging outside the scope of
locking.
Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The SCMI specification encompasses various protocols. However, not every
protocol has to be present on a given platform/implementation as not
every protocol is relevant for it.
Furthermore, the platform chooses which protocols it exposes to a given
agent. The only protocol that must be implemented is the base protocol.
The base protocol is used by an agent to discover which protocols are
available to it.
In order to enumerate the discovered implemented protocols, this patch
adds support for a separate scmi protocol bus. It also adds mechanism to
register support for different protocols.
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Uwe Kleine-König