2 commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Paolo Bonzini	6c370dc653	Merge branch 'kvm-guestmemfd' into HEAD ... Introduce several new KVM uAPIs to ultimately create a guest-first memory subsystem within KVM, a.k.a. guest_memfd. Guest-first memory allows KVM to provide features, enhancements, and optimizations that are kludgly or outright impossible to implement in a generic memory subsystem. The core KVM ioctl() for guest_memfd is KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD, which similar to the generic memfd_create(), creates an anonymous file and returns a file descriptor that refers to it. Again like "regular" memfd files, guest_memfd files live in RAM, have volatile storage, and are automatically released when the last reference is dropped. The key differences between memfd files (and every other memory subystem) is that guest_memfd files are bound to their owning virtual machine, cannot be mapped, read, or written by userspace, and cannot be resized. guest_memfd files do however support PUNCH_HOLE, which can be used to convert a guest memory area between the shared and guest-private states. A second KVM ioctl(), KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES, allows userspace to specify attributes for a given page of guest memory. In the long term, it will likely be extended to allow userspace to specify per-gfn RWX protections, including allowing memory to be writable in the guest without it also being writable in host userspace. The immediate and driving use case for guest_memfd are Confidential (CoCo) VMs, specifically AMD's SEV-SNP, Intel's TDX, and KVM's own pKVM. For such use cases, being able to map memory into KVM guests without requiring said memory to be mapped into the host is a hard requirement. While SEV+ and TDX prevent untrusted software from reading guest private data by encrypting guest memory, pKVM provides confidentiality and integrity *without* relying on memory encryption. In addition, with SEV-SNP and especially TDX, accessing guest private memory can be fatal to the host, i.e. KVM must be prevent host userspace from accessing guest memory irrespective of hardware behavior. Long term, guest_memfd may be useful for use cases beyond CoCo VMs, for example hardening userspace against unintentional accesses to guest memory. As mentioned earlier, KVM's ABI uses userspace VMA protections to define the allow guest protection (with an exception granted to mapping guest memory executable), and similarly KVM currently requires the guest mapping size to be a strict subset of the host userspace mapping size. Decoupling the mappings sizes would allow userspace to precisely map only what is needed and with the required permissions, without impacting guest performance. A guest-first memory subsystem also provides clearer line of sight to things like a dedicated memory pool (for slice-of-hardware VMs) and elimination of "struct page" (for offload setups where userspace _never_ needs to DMA from or into guest memory). guest_memfd is the result of 3+ years of development and exploration; taking on memory management responsibilities in KVM was not the first, second, or even third choice for supporting CoCo VMs. But after many failed attempts to avoid KVM-specific backing memory, and looking at where things ended up, it is quite clear that of all approaches tried, guest_memfd is the simplest, most robust, and most extensible, and the right thing to do for KVM and the kernel at-large. The "development cycle" for this version is going to be very short; ideally, next week I will merge it as is in kvm/next, taking this through the KVM tree for 6.8 immediately after the end of the merge window. The series is still based on 6.6 (plus KVM changes for 6.7) so it will require a small fixup for changes to get_file_rcu() introduced in 6.7 by commit 0ede61d858 ("file: convert to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU"). The fixup will be done as part of the merge commit, and most of the text above will become the commit message for the merge. Pending post-merge work includes: - hugepage support - looking into using the restrictedmem framework for guest memory - introducing a testing mechanism to poison memory, possibly using the same memory attributes introduced here - SNP and TDX support There are two non-KVM patches buried in the middle of this series: fs: Rename anon_inode_getfile_secure() and anon_inode_getfd_secure() mm: Add AS_UNMOVABLE to mark mapping as completely unmovable The first is small and mostly suggested-by Christian Brauner; the second a bit less so but it was written by an mm person (Vlastimil Babka).	2023-11-14 08:31:31 -05:00
Sean Christopherson	a7800aa80e	KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory ... Introduce an ioctl(), KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD, to allow creating file-based memory that is tied to a specific KVM virtual machine and whose primary purpose is to serve guest memory. A guest-first memory subsystem allows for optimizations and enhancements that are kludgy or outright infeasible to implement/support in a generic memory subsystem. With guest_memfd, guest protections and mapping sizes are fully decoupled from host userspace mappings. E.g. KVM currently doesn't support mapping memory as writable in the guest without it also being writable in host userspace, as KVM's ABI uses VMA protections to define the allow guest protection. Userspace can fudge this by establishing two mappings, a writable mapping for the guest and readable one for itself, but that’s suboptimal on multiple fronts. Similarly, KVM currently requires the guest mapping size to be a strict subset of the host userspace mapping size, e.g. KVM doesn’t support creating a 1GiB guest mapping unless userspace also has a 1GiB guest mapping. Decoupling the mappings sizes would allow userspace to precisely map only what is needed without impacting guest performance, e.g. to harden against unintentional accesses to guest memory. Decoupling guest and userspace mappings may also allow for a cleaner alternative to high-granularity mappings for HugeTLB, which has reached a bit of an impasse and is unlikely to ever be merged. A guest-first memory subsystem also provides clearer line of sight to things like a dedicated memory pool (for slice-of-hardware VMs) and elimination of "struct page" (for offload setups where userspace _never_ needs to mmap() guest memory). More immediately, being able to map memory into KVM guests without mapping said memory into the host is critical for Confidential VMs (CoCo VMs), the initial use case for guest_memfd. While AMD's SEV and Intel's TDX prevent untrusted software from reading guest private data by encrypting guest memory with a key that isn't usable by the untrusted host, projects such as Protected KVM (pKVM) provide confidentiality and integrity *without* relying on memory encryption. And with SEV-SNP and TDX, accessing guest private memory can be fatal to the host, i.e. KVM must be prevent host userspace from accessing guest memory irrespective of hardware behavior. Attempt #1 to support CoCo VMs was to add a VMA flag to mark memory as being mappable only by KVM (or a similarly enlightened kernel subsystem). That approach was abandoned largely due to it needing to play games with PROT_NONE to prevent userspace from accessing guest memory. Attempt #2 to was to usurp PG_hwpoison to prevent the host from mapping guest private memory into userspace, but that approach failed to meet several requirements for software-based CoCo VMs, e.g. pKVM, as the kernel wouldn't easily be able to enforce a 1:1 page:guest association, let alone a 1:1 pfn:gfn mapping. And using PG_hwpoison does not work for memory that isn't backed by 'struct page', e.g. if devices gain support for exposing encrypted memory regions to guests. Attempt #3 was to extend the memfd() syscall and wrap shmem to provide dedicated file-based guest memory. That approach made it as far as v10 before feedback from Hugh Dickins and Christian Brauner (and others) led to it demise. Hugh's objection was that piggybacking shmem made no sense for KVM's use case as KVM didn't actually *want* the features provided by shmem. I.e. KVM was using memfd() and shmem to avoid having to manage memory directly, not because memfd() and shmem were the optimal solution, e.g. things like read/write/mmap in shmem were dead weight. Christian pointed out flaws with implementing a partial overlay (wrapping only _some_ of shmem), e.g. poking at inode_operations or super_operations would show shmem stuff, but address_space_operations and file_operations would show KVM's overlay. Paraphrashing heavily, Christian suggested KVM stop being lazy and create a proper API. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20201020061859.18385-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210416154106.23721-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210824005248.200037-1-seanjc@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211111141352.26311-1-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221202061347.1070246-1-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ff5c5b97-acdf-9745-ebe5-c6609dd6322e@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230418-anfallen-irdisch-6993a61be10b@brauner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZEM5Zq8oo+xnApW9@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230306191944.GA15773@monkey Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ZII1p8ZHlHaQ3dDl@casper.infradead.org Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Cc: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com> Cc: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> Cc: Maciej Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Cc: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com> Cc: Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com> Cc: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com> Cc: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Co-developed-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> Co-developed-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> Co-developed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> Co-developed-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Co-developed-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20231027182217.3615211-17-seanjc@google.com> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>	2023-11-14 08:01:03 -05:00