This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-42-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_cleanup() is supposed to be called on error after a successful
call to nand_scan() to free all NAND resources.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible, hence pointing it as the commit to
fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing
any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-41-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-40-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
On error, the oxnas probe path just frees the device which failed and
aborts the probe, leaving unreleased resources.
Fix this situation by calling mtd_device_unregister()/nand_cleanup()
on these.
Fixes: 6685924924 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-38-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
While at it, be consistent and move the function call in the error
path thanks to a goto statement.
Fixes: 6685924924 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-37-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
All initialized and registered devices should be listed somewhere so
that we can unregister/free them in the _remove() path.
This patch is not a fix per-se but is needed to apply three other
fixes coming right after, explaining the Fixes/Cc: stable tags.
Fixes: 6685924924 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-36-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-35-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not
introducing any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-34-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-33-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-32-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-31-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-30-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-29-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not
introducing any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-28-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-27-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-26-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-25-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-24-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-23-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. Hence, pointing it as the commit to
fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing
any bug makes sense.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-22-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-21-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-20-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-19-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-18-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-17-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-16-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-15-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-14-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Not sure nand_cleanup() is the right function to call here but in any
case it is not nand_release(). Indeed, even a comment says that
calling nand_release() is a bit of a hack as there is no MTD device to
unregister. So switch to nand_cleanup() for now and drop this
comment.
There is no Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if it did not intruce
any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-13-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-12-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-10-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-9-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-6-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Add support for the hardware ECC BCH engine.
Please mind that this engine has an important limitation:
BCH implementation does not inform the user when an uncorrectable ECC
error occurs. To workaround this, we avoid using the hardware engine
in the read path and do the computation with the software BCH
implementation, which is faster than mixing hardware (for correction)
and software (for verification).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-9-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Add the Arasan NAND controller driver. This brings only NAND
controller support. The ECC engine being a bit subtle, hardware ECC
support will be added in a second time.
This work is based on contributions from Naga Sureshkumar Relli.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
There are cases where ECC bytes are not byte-aligned. Indeed, BCH
implies using a number of ECC bits, which are not always a multiple of
8. We then need a helper like nand_extract_bits() to extract these
syndromes from a buffer.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The main NAND read page function can loop over "page reads" many times
in if the reading reports uncorrectable error(s) and if the chip
supports the read_retry feature.
In this case, the number of bitflips is summarized between
attempts. Fix this by re-initializing the entire mtd_ecc_stats object
each time we retry.
Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
It seems that several hardware ECC engine use a swapped representation
of bytes compared to software. This might having to do with how the
ECC engine is wired to the NAND controller or the order the bits are
passed to the hardware BCH logic.
This means that when the software BCH engine is working in conjunction
with data generated with hardware, sometimes we might need to swap the
bits inside bytes, eg:
0x0A = b0000_1010 -> b0101_0000 = 0x50
Make it possible by adding a boolean to the BCH initialization routine.
Regarding the implementation itself, this is a rather simple approach
that can probably be enhanced in the future by preparing the
->a_{mod,pow}_tab tables with the swapping in mind.
Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
There are four exported functions, all suffixed by _bch, which is
clearly not the norm. Let's rename them by prefixing them with bch_
instead.
This is a mechanical change:
init_bch -> bch_init
free_bch -> bch_free
encode_bch -> bch_encode
decode_bch -> bch_decode
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
There are controllers not able to just read data cycles on the
bus. There are controllers not able to do a change column.
If we want to support both, we need to check which operation is
supported first. This is the exact same mechanism that is in use for
parameter page reads (ONFI/JEDEC) as the same problem occurs.
Speed testing does not show any throughput penalty so we do not
optimize more than that. However it is likely that, in the future, a
more robust and exhaustive test will run at boot time to avoid
re-checking what is supported and what is not at every call.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130834.2918-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Mimic what's done in nand_soft_waitrdy() and add one to the jiffies
timeout so we don't end up waiting less than actually required.
Reported-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Fixes: b0e137ad24 ("mtd: rawnand: Provide helper for polling GPIO R/B pin")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200518155237.297549-1-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Now that exec_op() is implemented we can get rid of the legacy interface
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200513172248.141402-4-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
