It is necessary to use hwirq instead of virq when you communicate
with an interrupt controller since there is no guaranty that virq
numbers match hwirq numbers.
Signed-off-by: Yuriy Kolerov <yuriy.kolerov@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
ARC700 support for 2 interrupt priorities historically allowed even slow
perpherals such as emac and uart to setup high priority interrupts
which was wrong from the beginning as they could possibly delay the more
critical timer interrupt.
The hardware support for 2 level interrupts in ARCompact is less than
ideal anyways (judging from the "hacks" in low level entry code and thus
is not used in productions systems I know of.
So reduce the scope of this to timer only, thereby reducing a bunch of
complexity.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Now that we have Timers probed from DT, don't need legacy domain
This however requires mapping to be called explicitly for the IRQ which
still can't (and probably never) be probed from DT such as IPI and
SOFTIRQ
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
The primary interrupt handler arch_do_IRQ() was passing hwirq as linux
virq to core code. This was fragile and worked so far as we only had legacy/linear
domains.
This came out of a rant by Marc Zyngier.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/2015-December/000298.html
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
- timer frequency is derived from DT (no longer rely on top level
DT "clock-frequency" probed early and exported by asm/clk.h)
- TIMER0_IRQ need not be exported across arch code, confined to intc as
it is property of same
- Any failures in clockevent setup are considered pedantic and system
panic()'s as there is no generic fallback (unlike clocksource where
a jiffies based soft clocksource always exists)
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
There is no real ARC700 based SMP SoC so remove IPI definition.
EZChip's SMP ARC700 is going to use a different intc and IPI provider
anyways.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
The reason this was not done so far was lack of genuine IPI_IRQ for
ARC700, as we don't have a SMP version of core yet (which might change
soon thx to EZChip). Nevertheles to increase the build coverage, we
need to allow CONFIG_SMP for ARC700 and still be able to run it on a
UP platform (nsim or AXS101) with a UP Device Tree (SMP-on-UP)
The build itself requires some define for IPI_IRQ and even a dummy
value is fine since that code won't run anyways.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Historically this was done by ARC IDE driver, which is long gone.
IRQ core is pretty robust now and already checks if IRQs are enabled
in hard ISRs. Thus no point in checking this in arch code, for every
call of irq enabled.
Further if some driver does do that - let it bring down the system so we
notice/fix this sooner than covering up for sucker
This makes local_irq_enable() - for L1 only case atleast simple enough
so we can inline it.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
The IRQCHIP_DECLARE macro migrated to 'include/linux/irqchip.h'.
See commit 91e20b5040
("irqchip: Move IRQCHIP_DECLARE macro to include/linux/irqchip.h").
This patch removes the inclusions of private header 'drivers/irqchip/irqchip.h'
and if necessary replaces them with inclusions of 'include/linux/irqchip.h'.
Signed-off-by: Joel Porquet <joel@porquet.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
