[ Upstream commit 5c88a9ccd4 ]
In the error path, map->reg_type is being used for kernel warning
before its value is setup. Found by code inspection. Exposure to
user is wrong reg_type being emitted via kernel log. Use a local
var for reg_type and retrieve value for usage.
Fixes: 6c7f4f1e51 ("cxl/core/regs: Make cxl_map_{component, device}_regs() device generic")
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit dd22581f89 ]
The primary role of @dev is to host the mappings for devm operations.
@dev is too ambiguous as a name. I.e. when does @dev refer to the
'struct device *' instance that the registers belong, and when does
@dev refer to the 'struct device *' instance hosting the mapping for
devm operations?
Clarify the role of @dev in cxl_register_map by renaming it to @host.
Also, rename local variables to 'host' where map->host is used.
Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018171713.1883517-3-rrichter@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Stable-dep-of: 33d9c987bf ("cxl/port: Fix @host confusion in cxl_dport_setup_regs()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Pick up the first half of the RCH error handling series. The back half
needs some fixups for test regressions. Small conflicts with the PMU
work around register enumeration and setup helpers.
Pick up initial support for the CXL 3.0 performance monitoring
definition. Small conflicts with the firmware update work as they both
placed their init code in the same location.
The @map parameter to cxl_probe_X_registers() is filled in with the
mapping parameters of the register block. The @map parameter to
cxl_map_X_registers() only reads that information to perform the
mapping. Mark @map const for cxl_map_X_registers() to clarify that it is
only an input to those helpers.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/168679258103.3436160.4941603739448763855.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
When probing the Component Registers in function cxl_probe_regs()
there are also checks for the existence of the HDM and RAS
capabilities. The checks may fail for components that do not implement
the HDM capability causing the Component Registers setup to fail too.
Remove the checks for a generalized use of cxl_probe_regs() and check
them directly before mapping the RAS or HDM capabilities. This allows
it to setup other Component Registers esp. of an RCH Downstream Port,
which will be implemented in a follow-on patch.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-12-terry.bowman@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The endpoint implements component register setup code. Refactor it for
reuse with RCRB, downstream port, and upstream port setup.
Move PCI specifics from cxl_setup_regs() into cxl_pci_setup_regs().
Move cxl_setup_regs() into cxl/core/regs.c and export it. This also
includes supporting static functions cxl_map_registerblock(),
cxl_unmap_register_block() and cxl_probe_regs().
Co-developed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-8-terry.bowman@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The corresponding device of a register mapping is used for devm
operations and logging. For operations with struct cxl_register_map
the device needs to be kept track separately. To simpify the involved
function interfaces, add @dev to cxl_register_map.
While at it also reorder function arguments of cxl_map_device_regs()
and cxl_map_component_regs() to have the object @cxl_register_map
first.
As a result a bunch of functions are available to be used with a
@cxl_register_map object.
This patch is in preparation of reworking the component register setup
code.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-7-terry.bowman@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Prepare cxl_probe_rcrb() for retrieving more than just the component
register block. The RCH AER handling code wants to get back to the AER
capability that happens to be MMIO mapped rather then configuration
cycles.
Move RCRB specific downstream port data, like the RCRB base and the
AER capability offset, into its own data structure ('struct
cxl_rcrb_info') for cxl_probe_rcrb() to fill. Extend 'struct
cxl_dport' to include a 'struct cxl_rcrb_info' attribute.
This centralizes all RCRB scanning in one routine.
Co-developed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-4-terry.bowman@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The RCRB is extracted already during ACPI CEDT table parsing while the
data of this is needed not earlier than dport creation. This
implementation comes with drawbacks: During ACPI table scan there is
already MMIO access including mapping and unmapping, but only ACPI
data should be collected here. The collected data must be transferred
through a couple of interfaces until it is finally consumed when
creating the dport. This causes complex data structures and function
interfaces. Additionally, RCRB parsing will be extended to also
extract AER data, it would be much easier do this at a later point
during port and dport creation when the data structures are available
to hold that data.
To simplify all that, probe the RCRB at a later point during RCH
downstream port creation. Change ACPI table parser to only extract the
base address of either the component registers or the RCRB. Parse and
extract the RCRB in devm_cxl_add_rch_dport().
This is in preparation to centralize all RCRB scanning.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-2-terry.bowman@amd.com
Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-3-terry.bowman@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
CXL PMU devices can be found from entries in the Register
Locator DVSEC.
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526095824.16336-4-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Until the recently release CXL 3.0 specification, there
was only ever one instance of any given register block pointed
to by the Register Block Locator DVSEC. Now, the specification allows
for multiple CXL PMU instances, each with their own register block.
To enable this add cxl_find_regblock_instance() that takes an index
parameter and use that to implement cxl_count_regblock() and
cxl_find_regblock().
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526095824.16336-3-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The 0day robot belatedly points out that @addr is not properly tagged as
an iomap pointer:
"drivers/cxl/core/regs.c:332:14: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in
assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected void *addr @@
got void [noderef] __iomem * @@"
Fixes: 1168271ca054 ("cxl/acpi: Extract component registers of restricted hosts from RCRB")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/167008768190.2516013.11918622906007677341.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The RAS Capability Structure has some ancillary information that may be
relevant with respect to AER events, link and protcol error status
registers. Map the RAS Capability Registers in support of defining a
'struct pci_error_handlers' instance for the cxl_pci driver.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166974412803.1608150.7096566580400947001.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The RAS Capabilitiy Structure is a CXL Component register capability
block. Unlike the HDM Decoder Capability, it will be referenced by the
cxl_pci driver in response to PCIe AER events. Due to this it is no
longer the case that cxl_map_component_regs() can assume that it should
map all component registers. Plumb a bitmask of capability ids to map
through cxl_map_component_regs().
For symmetry cxl_probe_device_regs() is updated to populate @id in
'struct cxl_reg_map' even though cxl_map_device_regs() does not have a
need to map a subset of the device registers per caller.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166974412214.1608150.11487843455070795378.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Rather then duplicating the setting of valid, length, and offset for
each type, just convey a pointer to the register map to common code.
Yes, the change in cxl_probe_component_regs() does not save
any lines of code, but it is preparation for adding another component
register type to map (RAS Capability Structure).
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166974409293.1608150.17661353937678581423.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
A downstream port must be connected to a component register block.
For restricted hosts the base address is determined from the RCRB. The
RCRB is provided by the host's CEDT CHBS entry. Rework CEDT parser to
get the RCRB and add code to extract the component register block from
it.
RCRB's BAR[0..1] point to the component block containing CXL subsystem
component registers. MEMBAR extraction follows the PCI base spec here,
esp. 64 bit extraction and memory range alignment (6.0, 7.5.1.2.1). The
RCRB base address is cached in the cxl_dport per-host bridge so that the
upstream port component registers can be retrieved later by an RCD
(RCIEP) associated with the host bridge.
Note: Right now the component register block is used for HDM decoder
capability only which is optional for RCDs. If unsupported by the RCD,
the HDM init will fail. It is future work to bypass it in this case.
Co-developed-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y4dsGZ24aJlxSfI1@rric.localdomain
[djbw: introduce devm_cxl_add_rch_dport()]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166993044524.1882361.2539922887413208807.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The physical base address of a CXL range can be invalid and is then
set to CXL_RESOURCE_NONE. In general software shall prevent such
situations, but it is hard to proof this may never happen. E.g. in
add_port_attach_ep() there this the following:
component_reg_phys = find_component_registers(uport_dev);
port = devm_cxl_add_port(&parent_port->dev, uport_dev,
component_reg_phys, parent_dport);
find_component_registers() and subsequent functions (e.g.
cxl_regmap_to_base()) may return CXL_RESOURCE_NONE. But it is written
to port without any further check in cxl_port_alloc():
port->component_reg_phys = component_reg_phys;
It is then later directly used in devm_cxl_setup_hdm() to map io
ranges with devm_cxl_iomap_block(). Just an example...
Check this condition. Also do not fail silently like an ioremap()
failure, use a WARN_ON_ONCE() for it.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018132341.76259-3-rrichter@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The function devm_cxl_iomap_block() is only used in the core
code. There are two declarations in header files of it, in
drivers/cxl/core/core.h and drivers/cxl/cxl.h. Remove its unused
declaration in drivers/cxl/cxl.h.
Fixing build error in regs.c found by kernel test robot by including
"core.h" there.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018132341.76259-2-rrichter@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
In CXL 2.0, 8.2.5.1 CXL Capability Header Register: this register
is given as 32 bits.
8.2.3 which covers the CXL 2.0 Component registers, including the
CXL Capability Header Register states that access restrictions
specified in Section 8.2.2 apply.
8.2.2 includes:
* A 32 bit register shall be accessed as a 4 Byte quantity.
...
If these rules are not followed, the behavior is undefined.
Discovered during review of CXL QEMU emulation. Alex Bennée pointed
out there was a comment saying that 4 byte registers must be read
with a 4 byte read, but 8 byte reads were being emulated.
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87bkzyd3c7.fsf@linaro.org/
Fixing that, led to this code failing. Whilst a given hardware
implementation 'might' work with an 8 byte read, it should not be relied
upon. The QEMU emulation v5 will return 0 and log the wrong access width.
The code moved, so one fixes tag for where this will directly apply and
also a reference to the earlier introduction of the code for backports.
Fixes: 0f06157e01 ("cxl/core: Move register mapping infrastructure")
Fixes: 08422378c4 ("cxl/pci: Add HDM decoder capabilities")
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220201153437.2873-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Unlike the decoder enumeration for "root decoders" described by platform
firmware, standard decoders can be enumerated from the component
registers space once the base address has been identified (via PCI,
ACPI, or another mechanism).
Add common infrastructure for HDM (Host-managed-Device-Memory) Decoder
enumeration and share it between host-bridge, upstream switch port, and
cxl_test defined decoders.
The locking model for switch level decoders is to hold the port lock
over the enumeration. This facilitates moving the dport and decoder
enumeration to a 'port' driver. For now, the only enumerator of decoder
resources is the cxl_acpi root driver.
Co-developed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164374688404.395335.9239248252443123526.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Similar to the mem.h rename, if the core wants to reuse definitions from
drivers/cxl/pci.h it is unable to use <pci.h> as that collides with
archs that have an arch/$arch/include/asm/pci.h, like MIPS.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164298422510.3018233.14693126572756675563.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
This implements the TODO in cxl_acpi for mapping component registers.
cxl_acpi becomes the second consumer of CXL register block enumeration
(cxl_pci being the first). Moving the functionality to cxl_core allows
both of these drivers to use the functionality. Equally importantly it
allows cxl_core to use the functionality in the future.
CXL 2.0 root ports are similar to CXL 2.0 Downstream Ports with the main
distinction being they're a part of the CXL 2.0 host bridge. While
mapping their component registers is not immediately useful for the CXL
drivers, the movement of register block enumeration into core is a vital
step towards HDM decoder programming.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
[djbw: fix cxl_regmap_to_base() failure cases]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164298415080.3018233.14694957480228676592.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
It turns out that the usb example of specifying the subsystem namespace
at build time is not preferred. The rationale for that preference has
become more apparent as CXL patches with plain EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL beg the
question, "why would any code other than CXL care about this symbol?".
Make the namespace explicit.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163676356810.3618264.601632777702192938.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The register mapping infrastructure is large enough to move to its own
compilation unit. This also cleans up an unnecessary include of <mem.h>
core/bus.c.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162800068975.665205.12895551621746585289.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Dave Jiang