Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dan Williams
21083f5152 cxl/pmem: Register 'pmem' / cxl_nvdimm devices
While a memX device on /sys/bus/cxl represents a CXL memory expander
control interface, a pmemX device represents the persistent memory
sub-functionality. It bridges the CXL subystem to the libnvdimm nmemX
control interface.

With this skeleton ndctl can now see persistent memory devices on a
"CXL" bus. Later patches add support for translating libnvdimm native
commands to CXL commands.

# ndctl list -BDiu -b CXL
{
  "provider":"CXL",
  "dev":"ndbus1",
  "dimms":[
    {
      "dev":"nmem1",
      "state":"disabled"
    },
    {
      "dev":"nmem0",
      "state":"disabled"
    }
  ]
}

Given nvdimm_bus_unregister() removes all devices on an ndbus0 the
cxl_pmem infrastructure needs to arrange ->remove() to be triggered on
cxl_nvdimm devices to keep their enabled state synchronized with the
registration state of their corresponding device on the nvdimm_bus. In
other words, always arrange for cxl_nvdimm_driver.remove() to unregister
nvdimms from an nvdimm_bus ahead of the bus being unregistered.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162380012696.3039556.4293801691038740850.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-06-15 16:47:34 -07:00
Ben Widawsky
6630d31c91 cxl/mem: Get rid of @cxlm.base
@cxlm.base only existed to support holding the base found in the
register block mapping code, and pass it along to the register setup
code. Now that the register setup function has all logic around managing
the registers, from DVSEC to iomapping up to populating our CXL specific
information, it is easy to turn the @base values into local variables
and remove them from our device driver state.

Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210520212953.1181695-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-05-26 11:20:18 -07:00
Vishal Verma
199cf8c3fe cxl/pci.c: Add a 'label_storage_size' attribute to the memdev
The 'Identify Device' mailbox command returns an 'lsa_size', which is
the size of the label storage area on the device. Export it as a sysfs
attribute so that userspace tooling to read/write the LSA can determine
the size without having to run an 'Identify Device' on their own.

Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210520194745.1095517-1-vishal.l.verma@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-05-26 11:20:17 -07:00
Dan Williams
8ac75dd6ab cxl/mem: Introduce 'struct cxl_regs' for "composable" CXL devices
CXL MMIO register blocks are organized by device type and capabilities.
There are Component registers, Device registers (yes, an ambiguous
name), and Memory Device registers (a specific extension of Device
registers).

It is possible for a given device instance (endpoint or port) to
implement register sets from multiple of the above categories.

The driver code that enumerates and maps the registers is type specific
so it is useful to have a dedicated type and helpers for each block
type.

At the same time, once the registers are mapped the origin type does not
matter. It is overly pedantic to reference the register block type in
code that is using the registers.

In preparation for the endpoint driver to incorporate Component registers
into its MMIO operations reorganize the registers to allow typed
enumeration + mapping, but anonymous usage. With the end state of
'struct cxl_regs' to be:

struct cxl_regs {
	union {
		struct {
			CXL_DEVICE_REGS();
		};
		struct cxl_device_regs device_regs;
	};
	union {
		struct {
			CXL_COMPONENT_REGS();
		};
		struct cxl_component_regs component_regs;
	};
};

With this arrangement the driver can share component init code with
ports, but when using the registers it can directly reference the
component register block type by name without the 'component_regs'
prefix.

So, map + enumerate can be shared across drivers of different CXL
classes e.g.:

void cxl_setup_device_regs(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base,
			   struct cxl_device_regs *regs);

void cxl_setup_component_regs(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base,
			      struct cxl_component_regs *regs);

...while inline usage in the driver need not indicate where the
registers came from:

readl(cxlm->regs.mbox + MBOX_OFFSET);
readl(cxlm->regs.hdm + HDM_OFFSET);

...instead of:

readl(cxlm->regs.device_regs.mbox + MBOX_OFFSET);
readl(cxlm->regs.component_regs.hdm + HDM_OFFSET);

This complexity of the definition in .h yields improvement in code
readability in .c while maintaining type-safety for organization of
setup code. It prepares the implementation to maintain organization in
the face of CXL devices that compose register interfaces consisting of
multiple types.

Given that this new container is named 'regs' rename the common register
base pointer @base, and fixup the kernel-doc for the missing @cxlmd
description.

Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162096971451.1865304.13540251513463515153.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-05-14 16:13:19 -07:00
Dan Williams
5f50d6b20c cxl/mem: Move some definitions to mem.h
In preparation for sharing cxl.h with other generic CXL consumers,
move / consolidate some of the memory device specifics to mem.h.

The motivation for moving out of cxl.h is to maintain least privilege
access to memory-device details since cxl.h is used in multiple files.
The motivation for moving definitions into a new mem.h header is for
code readability and organization. I.e. minimize implementation details
when reading data structures and other definitions.

Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162096970932.1865304.14510894426562947262.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-05-14 16:13:18 -07:00