There's a kernel bug that causes cookies to be misplaced and
the reason we did not catch this with this test is that we
provide bpf_fentry_test* functions already sorted by name.
Shuffling function bpf_fentry_test2 deeper in the list and
keeping the current cookie values as before will trigger
the bug.
The kernel fix is coming in following changes.
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615112118.497303-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Linux kernel may automatically reduce kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate
value when running tests in parallel on slow systems. Linux kernel checks
against this limit when opening perf event with freq=1 parameter set.
The lower bound is 1000. This patch reduces sample_freq value to 1000
in all BPF tests that use sample_freq to ensure they always can open
perf event.
Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220308200449.1757478-2-mykolal@fb.com
Fix how selftests determine relative offset of a function that is
uprobed. Previously, there was an assumption that uprobed function is
always in the first executable region, which is not always the case
(libbpf CI hits this case now). So get_base_addr() approach in isolation
doesn't work anymore. So teach get_uprobe_offset() to determine correct
memory mapping and calculate uprobe offset correctly.
While at it, I merged together two implementations of
get_uprobe_offset() helper, moving powerpc64-specific logic inside (had
to add extra {} block to avoid unused variable error for insn).
Also ensured that uprobed functions are never inlined, but are still
static (and thus local to each selftest), by using a no-op asm volatile
block internally. I didn't want to keep them global __weak, because some
tests use uprobe's ref counter offset (to test USDT-like logic) which is
not compatible with non-refcounted uprobe. So it's nicer to have each
test uprobe target local to the file and guaranteed to not be inlined or
skipped by the compiler (which can happen with static functions,
especially if compiling selftests with -O2).
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220126193058.3390292-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add selftest with few subtests testing proper bpf_cookie usage.
Kprobe and uprobe subtests are pretty straightforward and just validate that
the same BPF program attached with different bpf_cookie will be triggered with
those different bpf_cookie values.
Tracepoint subtest is a bit more interesting, as it is the only
perf_event-based BPF hook that shares bpf_prog_array between multiple
perf_events internally. This means that the same BPF program can't be attached
to the same tracepoint multiple times. So we have 3 identical copies. This
arrangement allows to test bpf_prog_array_copy()'s handling of bpf_prog_array
list manipulation logic when programs are attached and detached. The test
validates that bpf_cookie isn't mixed up and isn't lost during such list
manipulations.
Perf_event subtest validates that two BPF links can be created against the
same perf_event (but not at the same time, only one BPF program can be
attached to perf_event itself), and that for each we can specify different
bpf_cookie value.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210815070609.987780-15-andrii@kernel.org
Jiri Olsa