In the follow-up of commit fb3041d61f ("kbuild: fix SIGPIPE error
message for AR=gcc-ar and AR=llvm-ar"), Kees Cook pointed out that
tools should _not_ catch their own SIGPIPEs [1] [2].
Based on his feedback, LLVM was fixed [3].
However, Python's default behavior is to show noisy bracktrace when
SIGPIPE is sent. So, scripts written in Python are basically in the
same situation as the buggy llvm tools.
Example:
$ make -s allnoconfig
$ make -s allmodconfig
$ scripts/diffconfig .config.old .config | head -n1
-ALIX n
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/masahiro/linux/scripts/diffconfig", line 132, in <module>
main()
File "/home/masahiro/linux/scripts/diffconfig", line 130, in main
print_config("+", config, None, b[config])
File "/home/masahiro/linux/scripts/diffconfig", line 64, in print_config
print("+%s %s" % (config, new_value))
BrokenPipeError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
Python documentation [4] notes how to make scripts die immediately and
silently:
"""
Piping output of your program to tools like head(1) will cause a
SIGPIPE signal to be sent to your process when the receiver of its
standard output closes early. This results in an exception like
BrokenPipeError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe. To handle this case,
wrap your entry point to catch this exception as follows:
import os
import sys
def main():
try:
# simulate large output (your code replaces this loop)
for x in range(10000):
print("y")
# flush output here to force SIGPIPE to be triggered
# while inside this try block.
sys.stdout.flush()
except BrokenPipeError:
# Python flushes standard streams on exit; redirect remaining output
# to devnull to avoid another BrokenPipeError at shutdown
devnull = os.open(os.devnull, os.O_WRONLY)
os.dup2(devnull, sys.stdout.fileno())
sys.exit(1) # Python exits with error code 1 on EPIPE
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
Do not set SIGPIPE’s disposition to SIG_DFL in order to avoid
BrokenPipeError. Doing that would cause your program to exit
unexpectedly whenever any socket connection is interrupted while
your program is still writing to it.
"""
Currently, tools/perf/scripts/python/intel-pt-events.py seems to be the
only script that fixes the issue that way.
tools/perf/scripts/python/compaction-times.py uses another approach
signal.signal(signal.SIGPIPE, signal.SIG_DFL) but the Python
documentation clearly says "Don't do it".
I cannot fix all Python scripts since there are so many.
I fixed some in the scripts/ directory.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202211161056.1B9611A@keescook/
[2]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59037
[3]: 4787efa380
[4]: https://docs.python.org/3/library/signal.html#note-on-sigpipe
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
Convert list of clang-tidy arguments to a list for ease of adding to
them and extending them as required.
Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@quicinc.com>
Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
This `clang-analyzer` check flags the use of memset(), suggesting a more
secure version of the API, such as memset_s(), which does not exist in
the kernel:
warning: Call to function 'memset' is insecure as it does not provide
security checks introduced in the C11 standard. Replace with analogous
functions that support length arguments or provides boundary checks such
as 'memset_s' in case of C11
[clang-analyzer-security.insecureAPI.DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling]
Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
For the same reason as commit 51839e29cb ("scripts: switch explicitly
to Python 3"), switch some more scripts, which I tested and confirmed
working on Python 3.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
This patch adds clang-tidy and the clang static-analyzer as make
targets. The goal of this patch is to make static analysis tools
usable and extendable by any developer or researcher who is familiar
with basic c++.
The current static analysis tools require intimate knowledge of the
internal workings of the static analysis. Clang-tidy and the clang
static analyzers expose an easy to use api and allow users unfamiliar
with clang to write new checks with relative ease.
===Clang-tidy===
Clang-tidy is an easily extendable 'linter' that runs on the AST.
Clang-tidy checks are easy to write and understand. A check consists of
two parts, a matcher and a checker. The matcher is created using a
domain specific language that acts on the AST
(https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html). When AST
nodes are found by the matcher a callback is made to the checker. The
checker can then execute additional checks and issue warnings.
Here is an example clang-tidy check to report functions that have calls
to local_irq_disable without calls to local_irq_enable and vice-versa.
Functions flagged with __attribute((annotation("ignore_irq_balancing")))
are ignored for analysis. (https://reviews.llvm.org/D65828)
===Clang static analyzer===
The clang static analyzer is a more powerful static analysis tool that
uses symbolic execution to find bugs. Currently there is a check that
looks for potential security bugs from invalid uses of kmalloc and
kfree. There are several more general purpose checks that are useful for
the kernel.
The clang static analyzer is well documented and designed to be
extensible.
(https://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/checker_dev_manual.html)
(https://github.com/haoNoQ/clang-analyzer-guide/releases/download/v0.1/clang-analyzer-guide-v0.1.pdf)
The main draw of the clang tools is how accessible they are. The clang
documentation is very nice and these tools are built specifically to be
easily extendable by any developer. They provide an accessible method of
bug-finding and research to people who are not overly familiar with the
kernel codebase.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
