There are needs to created iommufd_access prior to have an IOAS and set
IOAS later. Like the vfio device cdev needs to have an iommufd object
to represent the bond (iommufd_access) and IOAS replacement.
Moves the iommufd_access_create() call into vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind(),
making it symmetric with the __vfio_iommufd_access_destroy() call in the
vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind(). This means an access is created/destroyed
by the bind()/unbind(), and the vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas() only
updates the access->ioas pointer.
Since vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind() does not provide ioas_id, drop it from
the argument list of iommufd_access_create(). Instead, add a new access
API iommufd_access_attach() to set the access->ioas pointer. Also, set
vdev->iommufd_attached accordingly, similar to the physical pathway.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327093351.44505-3-yi.l.liu@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
No need to pass the iommufd_ucmd pointer.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327093351.44505-2-yi.l.liu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Provide a mock kernel module for the iommu_domain that allows it to run
without any HW and the mocking provides a way to directly validate that
the PFNs loaded into the iommu_domain are correct. This exposes the access
kAPI toward userspace to allow userspace to explore the functionality of
pages.c and io_pagetable.c
The mock also simulates the rare case of PAGE_SIZE > iommu page size as
the mock will operate at a 2K iommu page size. This allows exercising all
of the calculations to support this mismatch.
This is also intended to support syzkaller exploring the same space.
However, it is an unusually invasive config option to enable all of
this. The config option should not be enabled in a production kernel.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/16-v6-a196d26f289e+11787-iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> # s390
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> # aarch64
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
