Fujitsu backlight and hotkey devices have ACPI drivers.
The PNP MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE in fujitsu-laptop driver is just used as an
indicator for module autoloading, but this is wrong because what we
need is ACPI module device table instead, because the driver is probing
ACPI devices.
Thus remove those IDs from ACPI PNP scan handler list as we don't
have a PNP driver for them, and convert the fujitsu-laptop PNP
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE to ACPI MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81971
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Dirk Griesbach <spamthis@freenet.de>
Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
0 is ascii for NULL. Hex digit matching should be from '0'.
Faulty version returns true for #,$,%,& etc.
Signed-off-by: Arjun Sreedharan <arjun024@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The soc_button_array PNP driver was introduced in 3.15.
But in commit eec15edbb0 (ACPI / PNP: use device ID list for
PNPACPI device enumeration), when reworking the PNPACPI device
enumeration, we missed the soc_button_array device ID.
This results in a regression in 3.16-rc1 that soc_button_array
pnp device fails to be enumerated.
Fix the problem by adding soc_button_array device ID into the
acpi_pnp scan handler's ID list.
Fixes: eec15edbb0 (ACPI / PNP: use device ID list for PNPACPI device enumeration)
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The "serial" PNP driver supports some "unknown" PNP modems
(PNPCXXX/PNPDXXX) by matching magic strings in the PNP device name
or the PNP device card name.
ACPI enumerated PNP devices neither are PNP cards, nor have those
magic strings in device names, so this mechamism never actually works
for ACPI enumerated PNPCXXX/PNPDXXX devices.
Consequently, it is safe to remove those two IDs from the PNP ACPI scan
handler's device ID list.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[rjw: Subject and changelog]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
The PNP ACPI scan handler device ID list includes all the IDs from
all of the struct pnp_device_id instances in the tree, but some of
them do not follow the ACPI PNP ID rule (3 letters + 4 hex digits).
For those IDs, the coressponding devices will never be enumerated
via ACPI, so it is safe to remove them from the PNP ACPI ID list.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[rjw: Subject and changelog]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
ACPI can be used to enumerate PNP devices, but the code does not
handle this in the right way currently. Namely, if an ACPI device
object
1. Has a _CRS method,
2. Has an identification of
"three capital characters followed by four hex digits",
3. Is not in the excluded IDs list,
it will be enumerated to PNP bus (that is, a PNP device object will
be create for it). This means that, actually, the PNP bus type is
used as the default bus type for enumerating _HID devices in ACPI.
However, more and more _HID devices need to be enumerated to the
platform bus instead (that is, platform device objects need to be
created for them). As a result, the device ID list in acpi_platform.c
is used to enforce creating platform device objects rather than PNP
device objects for matching devices. That list has been continuously
growing recently, unfortunately, and it is pretty much guaranteed to
grow even more in the future.
To address that problem it is better to enumerate _HID devices
as platform devices by default. To this end, change the way of
enumerating PNP devices by adding a PNP ACPI scan handler that
will use a device ID list to create PNP devices for the ACPI
device objects whose device IDs are present in that list.
The initial device ID list in the PNP ACPI scan handler contains
all of the pnp_device_id strings from all the existing PNP drivers,
so this change should be transparent to the PNP core and all of the
PNP drivers. Still, in the future it should be possible to reduce
its size by converting PNP drivers that need not be PNP for any
technical reasons into platform drivers.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[rjw: Rewrote the changelog, modified the PNP ACPI scan handler code]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
