The value returned by an spi driver's remove function is mostly ignored.
(Only an error message is printed if the value is non-zero that the
error is ignored.)
So change the prototype of the remove function to return no value. This
way driver authors are not tempted to assume that passing an error to
the upper layer is a good idea. All drivers are adapted accordingly.
There is no intended change of behaviour, all callbacks were prepared to
return 0 before.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Claudius Heine <ch@denx.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC
Acked-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220123175201.34839-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Apparently, this code does not actually fall through to the next case
because the machine restarts before it has a chance. However, for the
sake of maintenance and readability, we better add the missing break
statement.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1437892 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Add an example SPI slave handler to allow remote control of system
reboot, power off, halt, and suspend.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
