Commit graph

8341 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Omar Sandoval
57d4f0b863 btrfs: don't prematurely free work in scrub_missing_raid56_worker()
Currently, scrub_missing_raid56_worker() puts and potentially frees
sblock (which embeds the work item) and then submits a bio through
scrub_wr_submit(). This is another potential instance of the bug in
"btrfs: don't prematurely free work in run_ordered_work()". Fix it by
dropping the reference after we submit the bio.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:48 +01:00
Omar Sandoval
e732fe95e4 btrfs: don't prematurely free work in reada_start_machine_worker()
Currently, reada_start_machine_worker() frees the reada_machine_work and
then calls __reada_start_machine() to do readahead. This is another
potential instance of the bug in "btrfs: don't prematurely free work in
run_ordered_work()".

There _might_ already be a deadlock here: reada_start_machine_worker()
can depend on itself through stacked filesystems (__read_start_machine()
-> reada_start_machine_dev() -> reada_tree_block_flagged() ->
read_extent_buffer_pages() -> submit_one_bio() ->
btree_submit_bio_hook() -> btrfs_map_bio() -> submit_stripe_bio() ->
submit_bio() onto a loop device can trigger readahead on the lower
filesystem).

Either way, let's fix it by freeing the work at the end.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:48 +01:00
Omar Sandoval
9be490f1e1 btrfs: don't prematurely free work in end_workqueue_fn()
Currently, end_workqueue_fn() frees the end_io_wq entry (which embeds
the work item) and then calls bio_endio(). This is another potential
instance of the bug in "btrfs: don't prematurely free work in
run_ordered_work()".

In particular, the endio call may depend on other work items. For
example, btrfs_end_dio_bio() can call btrfs_subio_endio_read() ->
__btrfs_correct_data_nocsum() -> dio_read_error() ->
submit_dio_repair_bio(), which submits a bio that is also completed
through a end_workqueue_fn() work item. However,
__btrfs_correct_data_nocsum() waits for the newly submitted bio to
complete, thus it depends on another work item.

This example currently usually works because we use different workqueue
helper functions for BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_DATA and BTRFS_WQ_ENDIO_DIO_REPAIR.
However, it may deadlock with stacked filesystems and is fragile
overall. The proper fix is to free the work item at the very end of the
work function, so let's do that.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:48 +01:00
Omar Sandoval
c495dcd6fb btrfs: don't prematurely free work in run_ordered_work()
We hit the following very strange deadlock on a system with Btrfs on a
loop device backed by another Btrfs filesystem:

1. The top (loop device) filesystem queues an async_cow work item from
   cow_file_range_async(). We'll call this work X.
2. Worker thread A starts work X (normal_work_helper()).
3. Worker thread A executes the ordered work for the top filesystem
   (run_ordered_work()).
4. Worker thread A finishes the ordered work for work X and frees X
   (work->ordered_free()).
5. Worker thread A executes another ordered work and gets blocked on I/O
   to the bottom filesystem (still in run_ordered_work()).
6. Meanwhile, the bottom filesystem allocates and queues an async_cow
   work item which happens to be the recently-freed X.
7. The workqueue code sees that X is already being executed by worker
   thread A, so it schedules X to be executed _after_ worker thread A
   finishes (see the find_worker_executing_work() call in
   process_one_work()).

Now, the top filesystem is waiting for I/O on the bottom filesystem, but
the bottom filesystem is waiting for the top filesystem to finish, so we
deadlock.

This happens because we are breaking the workqueue assumption that a
work item cannot be recycled while it still depends on other work. Fix
it by waiting to free the work item until we are done with all of the
related ordered work.

P.S.:

One might ask why the workqueue code doesn't try to detect a recycled
work item. It actually does try by checking whether the work item has
the same work function (find_worker_executing_work()), but in our case
the function is the same. This is the only key that the workqueue code
has available to compare, short of adding an additional, layer-violating
"custom key". Considering that we're the only ones that have ever hit
this, we should just play by the rules.

Unfortunately, we haven't been able to create a minimal reproducer other
than our full container setup using a compress-force=zstd filesystem on
top of another compress-force=zstd filesystem.

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:48 +01:00
Omar Sandoval
cdc6f1668e btrfs: get rid of unnecessary memset() of work item
Commit fc97fab0ea ("btrfs: Replace fs_info->qgroup_rescan_worker
workqueue with btrfs_workqueue.") converted qgroup_rescan_work to be
initialized with btrfs_init_work(), but it left behind an unnecessary
memset(). Get rid of the memset().

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:47 +01:00
Josef Bacik
b3f167aa6c btrfs: move the failrec tree stuff into extent-io-tree.h
This needs to be cleaned up in the future, but for now it belongs to the
extent-io-tree stuff since it uses the internal tree search code.
Needed to export get_state_failrec and set_state_failrec as well since
we're not going to move the actual IO part of the failrec stuff out at
this point.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:47 +01:00
Josef Bacik
083e75e7e6 btrfs: export find_delalloc_range
This utilizes internal stuff to the extent_io_tree, so we need to export
it before we move it.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:47 +01:00
Josef Bacik
9c7d3a5483 btrfs: move extent_io_tree defs to their own header
extent_io.c/h are huge, encompassing a bunch of different things.  The
extent_io_tree code can live on its own, so separate this out.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:47 +01:00
Josef Bacik
6f0d04f8e7 btrfs: separate out the extent io init function
We are moving extent_io_tree into it's on file, so separate out the
extent_state init stuff from extent_io_tree_init().

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:47 +01:00
Josef Bacik
33ca832fef btrfs: separate out the extent leak code
We check both extent buffer and extent state leaks in the same function,
separate these two functions out so we can move them around.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:46 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
34ffafdba1 btrfs: ctree: Remove stray comment of setting up path lock
The following comment shows up in btrfs_search_slot() with out much
sense:

	/*
	 * setup the path here so we can release it under lock
	 * contention with the cow code
	 */
	if (cow) {
		/* code touching path->lock[] is far away from here */
	}

This comment hasn't been cleaned up after the relevant code has been
removed.

The original code is introduced in commit 65b51a009e
("btrfs_search_slot: reduce lock contention by cowing in two stages"):

  +
  +               /*
  +                * setup the path here so we can release it under lock
  +                * contention with the cow code
  +                */
  +               p->nodes[level] = b;
  +               if (!p->skip_locking)
  +                       p->locks[level] = 1;
  +

But in current code, we have different timing for modifying path lock,
so just remove the comment.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:46 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
abe9339d69 btrfs: ctree: Reduce one indent level for btrfs_search_old_slot()
Similar to btrfs_search_slot() done in previous patch, make a shortcut
for the level 0 case and allow to reduce indentation for the remaining
case.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:46 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
f624d97608 btrfs: ctree: Reduce one indent level for btrfs_search_slot()
In btrfs_search_slot(), we something like:

	if (level != 0) {
		/* Do search inside tree nodes*/
	} else {
		/* Do search inside tree leaves */
		goto done;
	}

This caused extra indent for tree node search code.  Change it to
something like:

	if (level == 0) {
		/* Do search inside tree leaves */
		goto done'
	}
	/* Do search inside tree nodes */

So we have more space to maneuver our code, this is especially useful as
the tree nodes search code is more complex than the leaves search code.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:46 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
71bf92a9b8 btrfs: tree-checker: Add check for INODE_REF
For INODE_REF we will check:
- Objectid (ino) against previous key
  To detect missing INODE_ITEM.

- No overflow/padding in the data payload
  Much like DIR_ITEM, but with less members to check.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:46 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
c18679ebd8 btrfs: tree-checker: Try to detect missing INODE_ITEM
For the following items, key->objectid is inode number:
- DIR_ITEM
- DIR_INDEX
- XATTR_ITEM
- EXTENT_DATA
- INODE_REF

So in the subvolume tree, such items must have its previous item share the
same objectid, e.g.:

 (257 INODE_ITEM 0)
 (257 DIR_INDEX xxx)
 (257 DIR_ITEM xxx)
 (258 INODE_ITEM 0)
 (258 INODE_REF 0)
 (258 XATTR_ITEM 0)
 (258 EXTENT_DATA 0)

But if we have the following sequence, then there is definitely
something wrong, normally some INODE_ITEM is missing, like:

 (257 INODE_ITEM 0)
 (257 DIR_INDEX xxx)
 (257 DIR_ITEM xxx)
 (258 XATTR_ITEM 0)  <<< objecitd suddenly changed to 258
 (258 EXTENT_DATA 0)

So just by checking the previous key for above inode based key types, we
can detect a missing inode item.

For INODE_REF key type, the check will be added along with INODE_REF
checker.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:46 +01:00
Filipe Manana
b9fae2ebee Btrfs: make btrfs_wait_extents() static
It's not used ouside of transaction.c

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:45 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
35b814f3c5 btrfs: Add assert to catch nested transaction commit
A recent patch to btrfs showed that there was at least 1 case where a
nested transaction was committed. Nested transaction in this case means
a code which has a transaction handle calls some function which in turn
obtains a copy of the same transaction handle. In such cases the correct
thing to do is for the lower callee to call btrfs_end_transaction which
contains appropriate checks so as to not commit the transaction which
will result in stale trans handler for the caller.

To catch such cases add an assert in btrfs_commit_transaction ensuring
btrfs_trans_handle::use_count is always 1.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:45 +01:00
Goldwyn Rodrigues
9cf35f6735 btrfs: simplify inode locking for RWF_NOWAIT
This is similar to 942491c9e6 ("xfs: fix AIM7 regression"). Apparently
our current rwsem code doesn't like doing the trylock, then lock for
real scheme. This causes extra contention on the lock and can be
measured eg. by AIM7 benchmark.  So change our read/write methods to
just do the trylock for the RWF_NOWAIT case.

Fixes: edf064e7c6 ("btrfs: nowait aio support")
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:45 +01:00
Linus Torvalds
afd7a71872 for-5.4-rc7-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAl3MUkoACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDvAEQ//fEHZ51NbIMwJNltqF4mr6Oao0M5u0wejEgiXzmR9E1IuHUgVK+KDQmSu
 wZl/y+RTlQC0TiURyStaVFBreXEqiuB79my9u4iDeNv/4UJQB42qpmYB4EuviDgB
 mxb9bFpWTLkO6Oc+vMrGF3BOmVsQKlq2nOua25g8VFtApQ6uiEfbwBOslCcC8kQB
 ZpNBl6x74xz/VWNWZnRStBfwYjRitKNDVU6dyIyRuLj8cktqfGBxGtx7/w0wDiZT
 kPR1bNtdpy3Ndke6H/0G6plRWi9kENqcN43hvrz54IKh2l+Jd2/as51j4Qq2tJU9
 KaAnJzRaSePxc2m0SqtgZTvc2BYSOg7dqaCyHxBB0CUBdTdJdz2TVZ2KM9MiLns4
 1haHBLo4l8o8zeYZpW05ac6OXKY4f8qsjWPEGshn4FDbq0TrHQzYxAF3c0X3hPag
 SnuvilgYUuYal+n87qinePg/ZmVrrBXPRycpQnn7FxqezJbf/2WUEojUVQnreU05
 mdp8mulxQxyFhgEvO7K1uDtlP8bqW69IO9M//6IWzGNKTDK2SRI08ULplghqgyna
 8SG0+y9w26r8UIWDhuvPbdfUMSG3kEH8yLFK84AFDMVJJxOnfznE3sC8sGOiP5q9
 OUkl8l7bhDkyAdWZY57gGUobebdPfnLxRV9A+LZQ2El1kSOEK18=
 =xzXs
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-5.4-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fix from David Sterba:
 "A fix for an older bug that has started to show up during testing
  (because of an updated test for rename exchange).

  It's an in-memory corruption caused by local variable leaking out of
  the function scope"

* tag 'for-5.4-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  Btrfs: fix log context list corruption after rename exchange operation
2019-11-13 12:06:10 -08:00
Filipe Manana
e6c617102c Btrfs: fix log context list corruption after rename exchange operation
During rename exchange we might have successfully log the new name in the
source root's log tree, in which case we leave our log context (allocated
on stack) in the root's list of log contextes. However we might fail to
log the new name in the destination root, in which case we fallback to
a transaction commit later and never sync the log of the source root,
which causes the source root log context to remain in the list of log
contextes. This later causes invalid memory accesses because the context
was allocated on stack and after rename exchange finishes the stack gets
reused and overwritten for other purposes.

The kernel's linked list corruption detector (CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST=y) can
detect this and report something like the following:

  [  691.489929] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [  691.489947] list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (ffff88819c944530), but was ffff8881c23f7be4. (prev=ffff8881c23f7a38).
  [  691.489967] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 28933 at lib/list_debug.c:28 __list_add_valid+0x95/0xe0
  (...)
  [  691.489998] CPU: 2 PID: 28933 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 5.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-62 #1
  [  691.490001] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-0-ga698c8995f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [  691.490003] RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid+0x95/0xe0
  (...)
  [  691.490007] RSP: 0018:ffff8881f0b3faf8 EFLAGS: 00010282
  [  691.490010] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88819c944530 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [  691.490011] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffffffffa2c497e0
  [  691.490013] RBP: ffff8881f0b3fe68 R08: ffffed103eaa4115 R09: ffffed103eaa4114
  [  691.490015] R10: ffff88819c944000 R11: ffffed103eaa4115 R12: 7fffffffffffffff
  [  691.490016] R13: ffff8881b4035610 R14: ffff8881e7b84728 R15: 1ffff1103e167f7b
  [  691.490019] FS:  00007f4b25ea2e80(0000) GS:ffff8881f5500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [  691.490021] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [  691.490022] CR2: 00007fffbb2d4eec CR3: 00000001f2a4a004 CR4: 00000000003606e0
  [  691.490025] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [  691.490027] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [  691.490029] Call Trace:
  [  691.490058]  btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x667/0x2730 [btrfs]
  [  691.490083]  ? join_transaction+0x24a/0xce0 [btrfs]
  [  691.490107]  ? btrfs_end_log_trans+0x80/0x80 [btrfs]
  [  691.490111]  ? dget_parent+0xb8/0x460
  [  691.490116]  ? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0
  [  691.490121]  ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
  [  691.490127]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x142/0x220
  [  691.490151]  btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x65/0x90 [btrfs]
  [  691.490172]  btrfs_sync_file+0x9f1/0xc00 [btrfs]
  [  691.490195]  ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x1800/0x1800 [btrfs]
  [  691.490198]  ? rcu_read_lock_any_held.part.11+0x20/0x20
  [  691.490204]  ? __do_sys_newstat+0x88/0xd0
  [  691.490207]  ? cp_new_stat+0x5d0/0x5d0
  [  691.490218]  ? do_fsync+0x38/0x60
  [  691.490220]  do_fsync+0x38/0x60
  [  691.490224]  __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x32/0x40
  [  691.490228]  do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x540
  [  691.490233]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
  [  691.490235] RIP: 0033:0x7f4b253ad5f0
  (...)
  [  691.490239] RSP: 002b:00007fffbb2d6078 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004b
  [  691.490242] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f4b253ad5f0
  [  691.490244] RDX: 00007fffbb2d5fe0 RSI: 00007fffbb2d5fe0 RDI: 0000000000000003
  [  691.490245] RBP: 000000000000000d R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007fffbb2d608c
  [  691.490247] R10: 00000000000002e8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000001f4
  [  691.490248] R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007fffbb2d6120 R15: 00005635a498bda0

This started happening recently when running some test cases from fstests
like btrfs/004 for example, because support for rename exchange was added
last week to fsstress from fstests.

So fix this by deleting the log context for the source root from the list
if we have logged the new name in the source root.

Reported-by: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
Fixes: d4682ba03e ("Btrfs: sync log after logging new name")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Tested-by: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-11 19:46:02 +01:00
Linus Torvalds
00aff68362 for-5.4-rc6-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAl3GwvEACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDvsfQ//UQ/TND1roMW3EmN+PLTRTUQS75Hb737r5Q66j0j94gFnBxB03R+tU8lP
 bH5XVpateb1wDmmdscqVQ1WM9O82bQdDNiYeLDr86+kzpLgy61rZHswZfNlDtl5M
 wDwyaxsrd7HndDeUZnIuaakYI9MXz9WIaNXkt0o8hSHctt0N18y23DSBFTVSh/4q
 T3cn4odkoBKtQ4mIn2OSmQvkl69nWRBVpjPJZIvsNszKjOo9aZTuGHrOWUV5RPiE
 Ho9UBkr+IjEDo8OH88vXAsHeYFIoYhEeUltjLHyF6Agwk1/Ajwp5sxXSubbfHUMQ
 l1YdmrTZf+l1Dxdj0sCdyK1npcgGI5IuZmIICpNUEAny9AbTtpSE3GNwtnIHAEAr
 cpki+1Z3lfaVSwNMYUz9Esbsb72C+f08WJHGHBMaOhjrBIwQUeWeYzTx6N7uDwNg
 GjaDRxjqFV2o7373isQaz7WOTatUMNtL1xvhkeceONI9NBXQRjW5rq5zECmr1ix7
 lSTKDzn7yAd6eGBW0T6iYdRl4Bta/zxPiDEF5KDNPugvv23yx17LAOdS4qAiHzbx
 oglra/kz9D4xmKVqH7hpFaaHrzL38G4mz6aMdwBu0M7dkn9AwsXiXWSDb0n7jnK0
 o96gkUBZjUSFBseUFD2s34MikFtrDynEJzPq96JHuWLguaByMcc=
 =CZxY
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-5.4-rc6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
 "A few regressions and fixes for stable.

  Regressions:

   - fix a race leading to metadata space leak after task received a
     signal

   - un-deprecate 2 ioctls, marked as deprecated by mistake

  Fixes:

   - fix limit check for number of devices during chunk allocation

   - fix a race due to double evaluation of i_size_read inside max()
     macro, can cause a crash

   - remove wrong device id check in tree-checker"

* tag 'for-5.4-rc6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: un-deprecate ioctls START_SYNC and WAIT_SYNC
  btrfs: save i_size to avoid double evaluation of i_size_read in compress_file_range
  Btrfs: fix race leading to metadata space leak after task received signal
  btrfs: tree-checker: Fix wrong check on max devid
  btrfs: Consider system chunk array size for new SYSTEM chunks
2019-11-09 08:51:37 -08:00
David Sterba
a5009d3a31 btrfs: un-deprecate ioctls START_SYNC and WAIT_SYNC
The two ioctls START_SYNC and WAIT_SYNC were mistakenly marked as
deprecated and scheduled for removal but we actualy do use them for
'btrfs subvolume delete -C/-c'. The deprecated thing in ebc87351e5
should have been just the async flag for subvolume creation.

The deprecation has been added in this development cycle, remove it
until it's time.

Fixes: ebc87351e5 ("btrfs: Deprecate BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ASYNC flag")
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-04 21:42:01 +01:00
Josef Bacik
d98da49977 btrfs: save i_size to avoid double evaluation of i_size_read in compress_file_range
We hit a regression while rolling out 5.2 internally where we were
hitting the following panic

  kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2659!
  RIP: 0010:clear_page_dirty_for_io+0xe6/0x1f0
  Call Trace:
   __process_pages_contig+0x25a/0x350
   ? extent_clear_unlock_delalloc+0x43/0x70
   submit_compressed_extents+0x359/0x4d0
   normal_work_helper+0x15a/0x330
   process_one_work+0x1f5/0x3f0
   worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0
   ? rescuer_thread+0x340/0x340
   kthread+0x111/0x130
   ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This is happening because the page is not locked when doing
clear_page_dirty_for_io.  Looking at the core dump it was because our
async_extent had a ram_size of 24576 but our async_chunk range only
spanned 20480, so we had a whole extra page in our ram_size for our
async_extent.

This happened because we try not to compress pages outside of our
i_size, however a cleanup patch changed us to do

actual_end = min_t(u64, i_size_read(inode), end + 1);

which is problematic because i_size_read() can evaluate to different
values in between checking and assigning.  So either an expanding
truncate or a fallocate could increase our i_size while we're doing
writeout and actual_end would end up being past the range we have
locked.

I confirmed this was what was happening by installing a debug kernel
that had

  actual_end = min_t(u64, i_size_read(inode), end + 1);
  if (actual_end > end + 1) {
	  printk(KERN_ERR "KABOOM\n");
	  actual_end = end + 1;
  }

and installing it onto 500 boxes of the tier that had been seeing the
problem regularly.  Last night I got my debug message and no panic,
confirming what I expected.

[ dsterba: the assembly confirms a tiny race window:

    mov    0x20(%rsp),%rax
    cmp    %rax,0x48(%r15)           # read
    movl   $0x0,0x18(%rsp)
    mov    %rax,%r12
    mov    %r14,%rax
    cmovbe 0x48(%r15),%r12           # eval

  Where r15 is inode and 0x48 is offset of i_size.

  The original fix was to revert 62b3762271 that would do an
  intermediate assignment and this would also avoid the doulble
  evaluation but is not future-proof, should the compiler merge the
  stores and call i_size_read anyway.

  There's a patch adding READ_ONCE to i_size_read but that's not being
  applied at the moment and we need to fix the bug. Instead, emulate
  READ_ONCE by two barrier()s that's what effectively happens. The
  assembly confirms single evaluation:

    mov    0x48(%rbp),%rax          # read once
    mov    0x20(%rsp),%rcx
    mov    $0x20,%edx
    cmp    %rax,%rcx
    cmovbe %rcx,%rax
    mov    %rax,(%rsp)
    mov    %rax,%rcx
    mov    %r14,%rax

  Where 0x48(%rbp) is inode->i_size stored to %eax.
]

Fixes: 62b3762271 ("btrfs: Remove isize local variable in compress_file_range")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ changelog updated ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-04 21:41:49 +01:00
Filipe Manana
0cab7acc4a Btrfs: fix race leading to metadata space leak after task received signal
When a task that is allocating metadata needs to wait for the async
reclaim job to process its ticket and gets a signal (because it was killed
for example) before doing the wait, the task ends up erroring out but
with space reserved for its ticket, which never gets released, resulting
in a metadata space leak (more specifically a leak in the bytes_may_use
counter of the metadata space_info object).

Here's the sequence of steps leading to the space leak:

1) A task tries to create a file for example, so it ends up trying to
   start a transaction at btrfs_create();

2) The filesystem is currently in a state where there is not enough
   metadata free space to satisfy the transaction's needs. So at
   space-info.c:__reserve_metadata_bytes() we create a ticket and
   add it to the list of tickets of the space info object. Also,
   because the metadata async reclaim job is not running, we queue
   a job ro run metadata reclaim;

3) In the meanwhile the task receives a signal (like SIGTERM from
   a kill command for example);

4) After queing the async reclaim job, at __reserve_metadata_bytes(),
   we unlock the metadata space info and call handle_reserve_ticket();

5) That last function calls wait_reserve_ticket(), which acquires the
   lock from the metadata space info. Then in the first iteration of
   its while loop, it calls prepare_to_wait_event(), which returns
   -ERESTARTSYS because the task has a pending signal. As a result,
   we set the error field of the ticket to -EINTR and exit the while
   loop without deleting the ticket from the list of tickets (in the
   space info object). After exiting the loop we unlock the space info;

6) The async reclaim job is able to release enough metadata, acquires
   the metadata space info's lock and then reserves space for the ticket,
   since the ticket is still in the list of (non-priority) tickets. The
   space reservation happens at btrfs_try_granting_tickets(), called from
   maybe_fail_all_tickets(). This increments the bytes_may_use counter
   from the metadata space info object, sets the ticket's bytes field to
   zero (meaning success, that space was reserved) and removes it from
   the list of tickets;

7) wait_reserve_ticket() returns, with the error field of the ticket
   set to -EINTR. Then handle_reserve_ticket() just propagates that error
   to the caller. Because an error was returned, the caller does not
   release the reserved space, since the expectation is that any error
   means no space was reserved.

Fix this by removing the ticket from the list, while holding the space
info lock, at wait_reserve_ticket() when prepare_to_wait_event() returns
an error.

Also add some comments and an assertion to guarantee we never end up with
a ticket that has an error set and a bytes counter field set to zero, to
more easily detect regressions in the future.

This issue could be triggered sporadically by some test cases from fstests
such as generic/269 for example, which tries to fill a filesystem and then
kills fsstress processes running in the background.

When this issue happens, we get a warning in syslog/dmesg when unmounting
the filesystem, like the following:

  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13240 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3186 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x314/0x470 [btrfs]
  (...)
  CPU: 0 PID: 13240 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W    L    5.3.0-rc8-btrfs-next-48+ #1
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-0-ga698c8995f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x314/0x470 [btrfs]
  (...)
  RSP: 0018:ffff9910c14cfdb8 EFLAGS: 00010286
  RAX: 0000000000000024 RBX: ffff89cd8a4d55f0 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff89cdf6a178a8 RDI: ffff89cdf6a178a8
  RBP: ffff9910c14cfde8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: ffff89cd4d618040 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff89cd8a4d5508
  R13: ffff89cde7c4a600 R14: dead000000000122 R15: dead000000000100
  FS:  00007f42754432c0(0000) GS:ffff89cdf6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007fd25a47f730 CR3: 000000021f8d6006 CR4: 00000000003606f0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Call Trace:
   close_ctree+0x1ad/0x390 [btrfs]
   generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x110
   kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30
   btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0xa0 [btrfs]
   deactivate_locked_super+0x3a/0x70
   cleanup_mnt+0xb4/0x160
   task_work_run+0x7e/0xc0
   exit_to_usermode_loop+0xfa/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x1cb/0x220
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
  RIP: 0033:0x7f4274d2cb37
  (...)
  RSP: 002b:00007ffcff701d38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000557ebde2f060 RCX: 00007f4274d2cb37
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000557ebde2f240
  RBP: 0000557ebde2f240 R08: 0000557ebde2f270 R09: 0000000000000015
  R10: 00000000000006b4 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f427522ee64
  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffcff701fc0
  irq event stamp: 0
  hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
  hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb12b561e>] copy_process+0x75e/0x1fd0
  softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb12b561e>] copy_process+0x75e/0x1fd0
  softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
  ---[ end trace bcf4b235461b26f6 ]---
  BTRFS info (device sdb): space_info 4 has 19116032 free, is full
  BTRFS info (device sdb): space_info total=33554432, used=14176256, pinned=0, reserved=0, may_use=196608, readonly=65536
  BTRFS info (device sdb): global_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
  BTRFS info (device sdb): trans_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
  BTRFS info (device sdb): chunk_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
  BTRFS info (device sdb): delayed_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0
  BTRFS info (device sdb): delayed_refs_rsv: size 0 reserved 0

Fixes: 374bf9c5cd ("btrfs: unify error handling for ticket flushing")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-25 19:11:34 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
8bb177d18f btrfs: tree-checker: Fix wrong check on max devid
[BUG]
The following script will cause false alert on devid check.
  #!/bin/bash

  dev1=/dev/test/test
  dev2=/dev/test/scratch1
  mnt=/mnt/btrfs

  umount $dev1 &> /dev/null
  umount $dev2 &> /dev/null
  umount $mnt &> /dev/null

  mkfs.btrfs -f $dev1

  mount $dev1 $mnt

  _fail()
  {
          echo "!!! FAILED !!!"
          exit 1
  }

  for ((i = 0; i < 4096; i++)); do
          btrfs dev add -f $dev2 $mnt || _fail
          btrfs dev del $dev1 $mnt || _fail
          dev_tmp=$dev1
          dev1=$dev2
          dev2=$dev_tmp
  done

[CAUSE]
Tree-checker uses BTRFS_MAX_DEVS() and BTRFS_MAX_DEVS_SYS_CHUNK() as
upper limit for devid.  But we can have devid holes just like above
script.

So the check for devid is incorrect and could cause false alert.

[FIX]
Just remove the whole devid check.  We don't have any hard requirement
for devid assignment.

Furthermore, even devid could get corrupted by a bitflip, we still have
dev extents verification at mount time, so corrupted data won't sneak
in.

This fixes fstests btrfs/194.

Reported-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Fixes: ab4ba2e133 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify dev item")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-25 19:11:34 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
c17add7a1c btrfs: Consider system chunk array size for new SYSTEM chunks
For SYSTEM chunks, despite the regular chunk item size limit, there is
another limit due to system chunk array size.

The extra limit was removed in a refactoring, so add it back.

Fixes: e3ecdb3fde ("btrfs: factor out devs_max setting in __btrfs_alloc_chunk")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.3+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-25 19:11:34 +02:00
Linus Torvalds
54955e3bfd for-5.4-rc4-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAl2vBPgACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDvaGQ/+JbV05ML7QjufNFKjzojNPg8dOwvLqF58askMEAqzyqOrzu1YsIOjchqv
 eZPP+wxh6j6i8LFnbaMYRhSVMlgpK9XOR3tNStp73QlSox6/6VKu7XR4wFXAoip3
 l4XI8UqO5XqDG55UTtjKyo2VNq8vgq1gRUWD6hPtfzDP6WYj4JZuXOd+dT6PbP32
 VHd91RoB8Z8qmypLF9Sju6IBWNhKl91TjlRqVdfLywaK8azqaxE1UttPf5DVbE6+
 MlTuXhuxkNc4ddzj//oJ1s3ZP/nXtFmIZ75+Sd6P5DfqRNeIfjkKqXvffsjqoYVI
 1Wv9sDiezxRB1RZjfInhtqvdvsqcsrXrM7x6BRVqI7IZDUaH5em8IoozQT62ze/4
 MJBrRIbVodx2I7EVDMNGkx2TaIDAfnW4Z3UC+YSHLoy6jht1+SA5KLQDR1G/4NeR
 dWht5wOXwhp8P3DoaczTUpk0DLtAtygj04fH8CG277EILLCpuWwW8iRkPttkrIM2
 HrtRKrKFJNyEpq9vHSFVvpQJkzgzqBFs1UnqnEuYh6qNgWCrS4PJDu9geQ8aPGr2
 pA5aEqg5b+jjWzIYDP93PF0u7kF4mFVAozn6xMf95FKmM1OupYYQg5BRe7n/DfDu
 yh3Ms0Mmd9+snpNJ9lDr40cobHC5CDvfvO2SRERyBeXxARainN0=
 =Ft+G
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-5.4-rc4-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:

 - fixes of error handling cleanup of metadata accounting with qgroups
   enabled

 - fix swapped values for qgroup tracepoints

 - fix race when handling full sync flag

 - don't start unused worker thread, functionality removed already

* tag 'for-5.4-rc4-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  Btrfs: check for the full sync flag while holding the inode lock during fsync
  Btrfs: fix qgroup double free after failure to reserve metadata for delalloc
  btrfs: tracepoints: Fix bad entry members of qgroup events
  btrfs: tracepoints: Fix wrong parameter order for qgroup events
  btrfs: qgroup: Always free PREALLOC META reserve in btrfs_delalloc_release_extents()
  btrfs: don't needlessly create extent-refs kernel thread
  btrfs: block-group: Fix a memory leak due to missing btrfs_put_block_group()
  Btrfs: add missing extents release on file extent cluster relocation error
2019-10-23 06:14:29 -04:00
Filipe Manana
ba0b084ac3 Btrfs: check for the full sync flag while holding the inode lock during fsync
We were checking for the full fsync flag in the inode before locking the
inode, which is racy, since at that that time it might not be set but
after we acquire the inode lock some other task set it. One case where
this can happen is on a system low on memory and some concurrent task
failed to allocate an extent map and therefore set the full sync flag on
the inode, to force the next fsync to work in full mode.

A consequence of missing the full fsync flag set is hitting the problems
fixed by commit 0c713cbab6 ("Btrfs: fix race between ranged fsync and
writeback of adjacent ranges"), BUG_ON() when dropping extents from a log
tree, hitting assertion failures at tree-log.c:copy_items() or all sorts
of weird inconsistencies after replaying a log due to file extents items
representing ranges that overlap.

So just move the check such that it's done after locking the inode and
before starting writeback again.

Fixes: 0c713cbab6 ("Btrfs: fix race between ranged fsync and writeback of adjacent ranges")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-17 20:36:02 +02:00
Filipe Manana
c7967fc149 Btrfs: fix qgroup double free after failure to reserve metadata for delalloc
If we fail to reserve metadata for delalloc operations we end up releasing
the previously reserved qgroup amount twice, once explicitly under the
'out_qgroup' label by calling btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc() and once
again, under label 'out_fail', by calling btrfs_inode_rsv_release() with a
value of 'true' for its 'qgroup_free' argument, which results in
btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc() being called again, so we end up having
a double free.

Also if we fail to reserve the necessary qgroup amount, we jump to the
label 'out_fail', which calls btrfs_inode_rsv_release() and that in turns
calls btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc(), even though we weren't able to
reserve any qgroup amount. So we freed some amount we never reserved.

So fix this by removing the call to btrfs_inode_rsv_release() in the
failure path, since it's not necessary at all as we haven't changed the
inode's block reserve in any way at this point.

Fixes: c8eaeac7b7 ("btrfs: reserve delalloc metadata differently")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-17 20:13:44 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
fd2b007eae btrfs: tracepoints: Fix wrong parameter order for qgroup events
[BUG]
For btrfs:qgroup_meta_reserve event, the trace event can output garbage:

  qgroup_meta_reserve: 9c7f6acc-b342-4037-bc47-7f6e4d2232d7: refroot=5(FS_TREE) type=DATA diff=2

The diff should always be alinged to sector size (4k), so there is
definitely something wrong.

[CAUSE]
For the wrong @diff, it's caused by wrong parameter order.
The correct parameters are:

  struct btrfs_root, s64 diff, int type.

However the parameters used are:

  struct btrfs_root, int type, s64 diff.

Fixes: 4ee0d8832c ("btrfs: qgroup: Update trace events for metadata reservation")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-17 14:09:31 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
8702ba9396 btrfs: qgroup: Always free PREALLOC META reserve in btrfs_delalloc_release_extents()
[Background]
Btrfs qgroup uses two types of reserved space for METADATA space,
PERTRANS and PREALLOC.

PERTRANS is metadata space reserved for each transaction started by
btrfs_start_transaction().
While PREALLOC is for delalloc, where we reserve space before joining a
transaction, and finally it will be converted to PERTRANS after the
writeback is done.

[Inconsistency]
However there is inconsistency in how we handle PREALLOC metadata space.

The most obvious one is:
In btrfs_buffered_write():
	btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), reserve_bytes, true);

We always free qgroup PREALLOC meta space.

While in btrfs_truncate_block():
	btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), blocksize, (ret != 0));

We only free qgroup PREALLOC meta space when something went wrong.

[The Correct Behavior]
The correct behavior should be the one in btrfs_buffered_write(), we
should always free PREALLOC metadata space.

The reason is, the btrfs_delalloc_* mechanism works by:
- Reserve metadata first, even it's not necessary
  In btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata()

- Free the unused metadata space
  Normally in:
  btrfs_delalloc_release_extents()
  |- btrfs_inode_rsv_release()
     Here we do calculation on whether we should release or not.

E.g. for 64K buffered write, the metadata rsv works like:

/* The first page */
reserve_meta:	num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
free_meta:	num_bytes=0
total:		num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
/* The first page caused one outstanding extent, thus needs metadata
   rsv */

/* The 2nd page */
reserve_meta:	num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
free_meta:	num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
total:		not changed
/* The 2nd page doesn't cause new outstanding extent, needs no new meta
   rsv, so we free what we have reserved */

/* The 3rd~16th pages */
reserve_meta:	num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
free_meta:	num_bytes=calc_inode_reservations()
total:		not changed (still space for one outstanding extent)

This means, if btrfs_delalloc_release_extents() determines to free some
space, then those space should be freed NOW.
So for qgroup, we should call btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc() other
than btrfs_qgroup_convert_reserved_meta().

The good news is:
- The callers are not that hot
  The hottest caller is in btrfs_buffered_write(), which is already
  fixed by commit 336a8bb8e3 ("btrfs: Fix wrong
  btrfs_delalloc_release_extents parameter"). Thus it's not that
  easy to cause false EDQUOT.

- The trans commit in advance for qgroup would hide the bug
  Since commit f5fef45936 ("btrfs: qgroup: Make qgroup async transaction
  commit more aggressive"), when btrfs qgroup metadata free space is slow,
  it will try to commit transaction and free the wrongly converted
  PERTRANS space, so it's not that easy to hit such bug.

[FIX]
So to fix the problem, remove the @qgroup_free parameter for
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(), and always pass true to
btrfs_inode_rsv_release().

Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Fixes: 43b18595d6 ("btrfs: qgroup: Use separate meta reservation type for delalloc")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-15 18:50:07 +02:00
David Sterba
80ed4548d0 btrfs: don't needlessly create extent-refs kernel thread
The patch 32b593bfcb ("Btrfs: remove no longer used function to run
delayed refs asynchronously") removed the async delayed refs but the
thread has been created, without any use. Remove it to avoid resource
consumption.

Fixes: 32b593bfcb ("Btrfs: remove no longer used function to run delayed refs asynchronously")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-15 15:43:29 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
4b654acdae btrfs: block-group: Fix a memory leak due to missing btrfs_put_block_group()
In btrfs_read_block_groups(), if we have an invalid block group which
has mixed type (DATA|METADATA) while the fs doesn't have MIXED_GROUPS
feature, we error out without freeing the block group cache.

This patch will add the missing btrfs_put_block_group() to prevent
memory leak.

Note for stable backports: the file to patch in versions <= 5.3 is
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c

Fixes: 49303381f1 ("Btrfs: bail out if block group has different mixed flag")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-11 21:27:51 +02:00
Filipe Manana
44db1216ef Btrfs: add missing extents release on file extent cluster relocation error
If we error out when finding a page at relocate_file_extent_cluster(), we
need to release the outstanding extents counter on the relocation inode,
set by the previous call to btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata(), otherwise
the inode's block reserve size can never decrease to zero and metadata
space is leaked. Therefore add a call to btrfs_delalloc_release_extents()
in case we can't find the target page.

Fixes: 8b62f87bad ("Btrfs: rework outstanding_extents")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-11 19:49:11 +02:00
Linus Torvalds
f8779876d4 for-5.4-rc2-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAl2fQkoACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDsXgA/+OpORcroqswa5V/AB5NgSMv08QfBtL7en7cUA2cGbrTt0lAoixIesCeGA
 7y4umlx7zWDhrG0NFv8E21xxkMzK72/YQnN0C6ZwRCi+ZbPSDlpMCwSNV9b6oVt4
 t9mJQ2kNZ80wj9W7jtoyiiWZ2OBccWywKBYr+BXybha5BliSd1XbpWMv90lODQHc
 1oH1FOphPAf+nSEtW4g0BV8UHy1n1+7TqjEHDilj0TuHlO0MHsR2FQcsRnMBv5H/
 CcEH3+870pUOjvm/l1OAdIrzrnH6UsXKHnOmJpYZIAQdG4xtHq/d6O9sfQMZK/Af
 VMXuju558kGOvrYdgffYa0HuW3P6c8q5BeEtGAZwjGsQS5GxmW63et/x+HIEl4RU
 4SWMfD592GK1/yQn31NWGav7Olkr4L0Eh9iqfKk2nWayTV+pqs8NgkGumkoNB66n
 WJs2m2WwKvZzj1Ys9ilRzo17qt2U/m4eLQtbut3m5eYCpzvo38PDrqOVqKTZG/dc
 nG1JBJNk+yjV+RkOO0gnQ8/zzooEGvMhVIx5iq52tWjvxnvOGSVv9QAAkKrbMoOX
 kn/b3heL57Z+kilUU3Zd0GvVif+awIgOj+PmAevR+w3MLoJ2gLfWb7qcONdHyFPk
 jK7rsuP737fyHpZ1tvJyfTt4Lk/u1UbApKrO4QIku1r9IJmmu20=
 =zpDj
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-5.4-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
 "A few more stabitly fixes, one build warning fix.

   - fix inode allocation under NOFS context

   - fix leak in fiemap due to concurrent append writes

   - fix log-root tree updates

   - fix balance convert of single profile on 32bit architectures

   - silence false positive warning on old GCCs (code moved in rc1)"

* tag 'for-5.4-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: silence maybe-uninitialized warning in clone_range
  btrfs: fix uninitialized ret in ref-verify
  btrfs: allocate new inode in NOFS context
  btrfs: fix balance convert to single on 32-bit host CPUs
  btrfs: fix incorrect updating of log root tree
  Btrfs: fix memory leak due to concurrent append writes with fiemap
2019-10-10 08:30:51 -07:00
Austin Kim
431d39887d btrfs: silence maybe-uninitialized warning in clone_range
GCC throws warning message as below:

‘clone_src_i_size’ may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
 #define IS_ALIGNED(x, a)  (((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0)
                       ^
fs/btrfs/send.c:5088:6: note: ‘clone_src_i_size’ was declared here
 u64 clone_src_i_size;
   ^
The clone_src_i_size is only used as call-by-reference
in a call to get_inode_info().

Silence the warning by initializing clone_src_i_size to 0.

Note that the warning is a false positive and reported by older versions
of GCC (eg. 7.x) but not eg 9.x. As there have been numerous people, the
patch is applied. Setting clone_src_i_size to 0 does not otherwise make
sense and would not do any action in case the code changes in the future.

Signed-off-by: Austin Kim <austindh.kim@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add note ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-08 13:14:55 +02:00
Josef Bacik
c5f4987e86 btrfs: fix uninitialized ret in ref-verify
Coverity caught a case where we could return with a uninitialized value
in ret in process_leaf.  This is actually pretty likely because we could
very easily run into a block group item key and have a garbage value in
ret and think there was an errror.  Fix this by initializing ret to 0.

Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Fixes: fd708b81d9 ("Btrfs: add a extent ref verify tool")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-03 15:00:56 +02:00
Josef Bacik
11a19a9087 btrfs: allocate new inode in NOFS context
A user reported a lockdep splat

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 5.2.11-gentoo #2 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 kswapd0/711 is trying to acquire lock:
 000000007777a663 (sb_internal){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x3a8/0x500

but task is already holding lock:
 000000000ba86300 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}:
 kmem_cache_alloc+0x1f/0x1c0
 btrfs_alloc_inode+0x1f/0x260
 alloc_inode+0x16/0xa0
 new_inode+0xe/0xb0
 btrfs_new_inode+0x70/0x610
 btrfs_symlink+0xd0/0x420
 vfs_symlink+0x9c/0x100
 do_symlinkat+0x66/0xe0
 do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1c0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

-> #0 (sb_internal){.+.+}:
 __sb_start_write+0xf6/0x150
 start_transaction+0x3a8/0x500
 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x59/0x110
 btrfs_evict_inode+0x19e/0x4c0
 evict+0xbc/0x1f0
 inode_lru_isolate+0x113/0x190
 __list_lru_walk_one.isra.4+0x5c/0x100
 list_lru_walk_one+0x32/0x50
 prune_icache_sb+0x36/0x80
 super_cache_scan+0x14a/0x1d0
 do_shrink_slab+0x131/0x320
 shrink_node+0xf7/0x380
 balance_pgdat+0x2d5/0x640
 kswapd+0x2ba/0x5e0
 kthread+0x147/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

 CPU0 CPU1
 ---- ----
 lock(fs_reclaim);
 lock(sb_internal);
 lock(fs_reclaim);
 lock(sb_internal);
*** DEADLOCK ***

 3 locks held by kswapd0/711:
 #0: 000000000ba86300 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30
 #1: 000000004a5100f8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_node+0x9a/0x380
 #2: 00000000f956fa46 (&type->s_umount_key#30){++++}, at: super_cache_scan+0x35/0x1d0

stack backtrace:
 CPU: 7 PID: 711 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.2.11-gentoo #2
 Hardware name: Dell Inc. Precision Tower 3620/0MWYPT, BIOS 2.4.2 09/29/2017
 Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x85/0xc7
 print_circular_bug.cold.40+0x1d9/0x235
 __lock_acquire+0x18b1/0x1f00
 lock_acquire+0xa6/0x170
 ? start_transaction+0x3a8/0x500
 __sb_start_write+0xf6/0x150
 ? start_transaction+0x3a8/0x500
 start_transaction+0x3a8/0x500
 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x59/0x110
 btrfs_evict_inode+0x19e/0x4c0
 ? var_wake_function+0x20/0x20
 evict+0xbc/0x1f0
 inode_lru_isolate+0x113/0x190
 ? discard_new_inode+0xc0/0xc0
 __list_lru_walk_one.isra.4+0x5c/0x100
 ? discard_new_inode+0xc0/0xc0
 list_lru_walk_one+0x32/0x50
 prune_icache_sb+0x36/0x80
 super_cache_scan+0x14a/0x1d0
 do_shrink_slab+0x131/0x320
 shrink_node+0xf7/0x380
 balance_pgdat+0x2d5/0x640
 kswapd+0x2ba/0x5e0
 ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x90/0x90
 kthread+0x147/0x160
 ? balance_pgdat+0x640/0x640
 ? __kthread_create_on_node+0x160/0x160
 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30

This is because btrfs_new_inode() calls new_inode() under the
transaction.  We could probably move the new_inode() outside of this but
for now just wrap it in memalloc_nofs_save().

Reported-by: Zdenek Sojka <zsojka@seznam.cz>
Fixes: 712e36c5f2 ("btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL in btrfs_alloc_inode")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.16+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-01 20:12:27 +02:00
Zygo Blaxell
7a54789074 btrfs: fix balance convert to single on 32-bit host CPUs
Currently, the command:

	btrfs balance start -dconvert=single,soft .

on a Raspberry Pi produces the following kernel message:

	BTRFS error (device mmcblk0p2): balance: invalid convert data profile single

This fails because we use is_power_of_2(unsigned long) to validate
the new data profile, the constant for 'single' profile uses bit 48,
and there are only 32 bits in a long on ARM.

Fix by open-coding the check using u64 variables.

Tested by completing the original balance command on several Raspberry
Pis.

Fixes: 818255feec ("btrfs: use common helper instead of open coding a bit test")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.20+
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-01 19:37:29 +02:00
Josef Bacik
4203e96894 btrfs: fix incorrect updating of log root tree
We've historically had reports of being unable to mount file systems
because the tree log root couldn't be read.  Usually this is the "parent
transid failure", but could be any of the related errors, including
"fsid mismatch" or "bad tree block", depending on which block got
allocated.

The modification of the individual log root items are serialized on the
per-log root root_mutex.  This means that any modification to the
per-subvol log root_item is completely protected.

However we update the root item in the log root tree outside of the log
root tree log_mutex.  We do this in order to allow multiple subvolumes
to be updated in each log transaction.

This is problematic however because when we are writing the log root
tree out we update the super block with the _current_ log root node
information.  Since these two operations happen independently of each
other, you can end up updating the log root tree in between writing out
the dirty blocks and setting the super block to point at the current
root.

This means we'll point at the new root node that hasn't been written
out, instead of the one we should be pointing at.  Thus whatever garbage
or old block we end up pointing at complains when we mount the file
system later and try to replay the log.

Fix this by copying the log's root item into a local root item copy.
Then once we're safely under the log_root_tree->log_mutex we update the
root item in the log_root_tree.  This way we do not modify the
log_root_tree while we're committing it, fixing the problem.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-01 18:41:02 +02:00
Filipe Manana
c67d970f0e Btrfs: fix memory leak due to concurrent append writes with fiemap
When we have a buffered write that starts at an offset greater than or
equals to the file's size happening concurrently with a full ranged
fiemap, we can end up leaking an extent state structure.

Suppose we have a file with a size of 1Mb, and before the buffered write
and fiemap are performed, it has a single extent state in its io tree
representing the range from 0 to 1Mb, with the EXTENT_DELALLOC bit set.

The following sequence diagram shows how the memory leak happens if a
fiemap a buffered write, starting at offset 1Mb and with a length of
4Kb, are performed concurrently.

          CPU 1                                                  CPU 2

  extent_fiemap()
    --> it's a full ranged fiemap
        range from 0 to LLONG_MAX - 1
        (9223372036854775807)

    --> locks range in the inode's
        io tree
      --> after this we have 2 extent
          states in the io tree:
          --> 1 for range [0, 1Mb[ with
              the bits EXTENT_LOCKED and
              EXTENT_DELALLOC_BITS set
          --> 1 for the range
              [1Mb, LLONG_MAX[ with
              the EXTENT_LOCKED bit set

                                                  --> start buffered write at offset
                                                      1Mb with a length of 4Kb

                                                  btrfs_file_write_iter()

                                                    btrfs_buffered_write()
                                                      --> cached_state is NULL

                                                      lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need()
                                                        --> returns 0 and does not lock
                                                            range because it starts
                                                            at current i_size / eof

                                                      --> cached_state remains NULL

                                                      btrfs_dirty_pages()
                                                        btrfs_set_extent_delalloc()
                                                          (...)
                                                          __set_extent_bit()

                                                            --> splits extent state for range
                                                                [1Mb, LLONG_MAX[ and now we
                                                                have 2 extent states:

                                                                --> one for the range
                                                                    [1Mb, 1Mb + 4Kb[ with
                                                                    EXTENT_LOCKED set
                                                                --> another one for the range
                                                                    [1Mb + 4Kb, LLONG_MAX[ with
                                                                    EXTENT_LOCKED set as well

                                                            --> sets EXTENT_DELALLOC on the
                                                                extent state for the range
                                                                [1Mb, 1Mb + 4Kb[
                                                            --> caches extent state
                                                                [1Mb, 1Mb + 4Kb[ into
                                                                @cached_state because it has
                                                                the bit EXTENT_LOCKED set

                                                    --> btrfs_buffered_write() ends up
                                                        with a non-NULL cached_state and
                                                        never calls anything to release its
                                                        reference on it, resulting in a
                                                        memory leak

Fix this by calling free_extent_state() on cached_state if the range was
not locked by lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need().

The same issue can happen if anything else other than fiemap locks a range
that covers eof and beyond.

This could be triggered, sporadically, by test case generic/561 from the
fstests suite, which makes duperemove run concurrently with fsstress, and
duperemove does plenty of calls to fiemap. When CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG is set
the leak is reported in dmesg/syslog when removing the btrfs module with
a message like the following:

  [77100.039461] BTRFS: state leak: start 6574080 end 6582271 state 16402 in tree 0 refs 1

Otherwise (CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG not set) detectable with kmemleak.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.16+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-10-01 18:40:58 +02:00
Linus Torvalds
bb48a59135 for-5.4-rc1-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAl2SDbMACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDsUhw/9HcRsT6SlrwA2R5leHxCR5UMwT2Zmbxpfft37ANF0SC1UINHBfnmquM97
 xX6fdRSR9RUjF9DrdLPfLBnJDQ/MnHl1ruIVBFhJm6cJ9TJwf9E0TiJBQt+08JWg
 vy5hZBWvsPWWRBJ94XPMe4LtakK/isW4Cz5W9AdrC2Siqw69j6eZzms2AnIjyBjA
 BoKg4se2Ay2rMxLZWXIOj9374PU+N1cnRnqgh77ZxLku5WdCzrDfB5safE7UmoTG
 /MWJuuIgzOk0iQpQORRtEZDS1dNe5KT9m4xXkUbrZbQROwqnXrT1SVIsuqNAvlPk
 uaymR1W8nshepzpMlSxVydLv/mKWZNUGnDxOJ23ooow8Yd7ndppXEtFuGwCYqIFc
 xQqxuTLREvJ9+jpSv11bmDpk/ULRqpV+2PjUqGaWlGwFArJ+qFRLVGYx31eXmDPj
 t2mrPOcXGzY0pKtIpbkuUGleY/jeI+BNsvD4+QPs+jnp0nmfvH0/Rmp7grGqx2FI
 rQM8Gn4a5i3nuEDWLp8nN2wcKC3ePwy96Vp2tqfsl6TVTPx4EFzGLkWogHR2yiqI
 0LAj8YWFmWuChSv71wYOjX79CppjcbNwOakSwtDjV30jkwoh2f/0D3OwOpua2xe8
 75KQMaSB0kesGZz7ZkL1kMqA5m5w7MGZom6XZoBJ+bq2HPLB2jo=
 =2UM7
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-5.4-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
 "A bunch of fixes that accumulated in recent weeks, mostly material for
  stable.

  Summary:

   - fix for regression from 5.3 that prevents to use balance convert
     with single profile

   - qgroup fixes: rescan race, accounting leak with multiple writers,
     potential leak after io failure recovery

   - fix for use after free in relocation (reported by KASAN)

   - other error handling fixups"

* tag 'for-5.4-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: qgroup: Fix reserved data space leak if we have multiple reserve calls
  btrfs: qgroup: Fix the wrong target io_tree when freeing reserved data space
  btrfs: Fix a regression which we can't convert to SINGLE profile
  btrfs: relocation: fix use-after-free on dead relocation roots
  Btrfs: fix race setting up and completing qgroup rescan workers
  Btrfs: fix missing error return if writeback for extent buffer never started
  btrfs: adjust dirty_metadata_bytes after writeback failure of extent buffer
  Btrfs: fix selftests failure due to uninitialized i_mode in test inodes
2019-09-30 10:25:24 -07:00
Qu Wenruo
d4e204948f btrfs: qgroup: Fix reserved data space leak if we have multiple reserve calls
[BUG]
The following script can cause btrfs qgroup data space leak:

  mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
  mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt

  btrfs subv create $mnt/subv
  btrfs quota en $mnt
  btrfs quota rescan -w $mnt
  btrfs qgroup limit 128m $mnt/subv

  for (( i = 0; i < 3; i++)); do
          # Create 3 64M holes for latter fallocate to fail
          truncate -s 192m $mnt/subv/file
          xfs_io -c "pwrite 64m 4k" $mnt/subv/file > /dev/null
          xfs_io -c "pwrite 128m 4k" $mnt/subv/file > /dev/null
          sync

          # it's supposed to fail, and each failure will leak at least 64M
          # data space
          xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 192m" $mnt/subv/file &> /dev/null
          rm $mnt/subv/file
          sync
  done

  # Shouldn't fail after we removed the file
  xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 64m" $mnt/subv/file

[CAUSE]
Btrfs qgroup data reserve code allow multiple reservations to happen on
a single extent_changeset:
E.g:
	btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, 0, SZ_1M);
	btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, SZ_1M, SZ_2M);
	btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, 0, SZ_4M);

Btrfs qgroup code has its internal tracking to make sure we don't
double-reserve in above example.

The only pattern utilizing this feature is in the main while loop of
btrfs_fallocate() function.

However btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data()'s error handling has a bug in that
on error it clears all ranges in the io_tree with EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED
flag but doesn't free previously reserved bytes.

This bug has a two fold effect:
- Clearing EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED ranges
  This is the correct behavior, but it prevents
  btrfs_qgroup_check_reserved_leak() to catch the leakage as the
  detector is purely EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag based.

- Leak the previously reserved data bytes.

The bug manifests when N calls to btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data are made and
the last one fails, leaking space reserved in the previous ones.

[FIX]
Also free previously reserved data bytes when btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data
fails.

Fixes: 5247255370 ("btrfs: qgroup: Introduce btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data function")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-27 15:24:34 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
bab32fc069 btrfs: qgroup: Fix the wrong target io_tree when freeing reserved data space
[BUG]
Under the following case with qgroup enabled, if some error happened
after we have reserved delalloc space, then in error handling path, we
could cause qgroup data space leakage:

From btrfs_truncate_block() in inode.c:

	ret = btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(inode, &data_reserved,
					   block_start, blocksize);
	if (ret)
		goto out;

 again:
	page = find_or_create_page(mapping, index, mask);
	if (!page) {
		btrfs_delalloc_release_space(inode, data_reserved,
					     block_start, blocksize, true);
		btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), blocksize, true);
		ret = -ENOMEM;
		goto out;
	}

[CAUSE]
In the above case, btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space() will call
btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() and mark the io_tree range with
EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag.

In the error handling path, we have the following call stack:
btrfs_delalloc_release_space()
|- btrfs_free_reserved_data_space()
   |- btrsf_qgroup_free_data()
      |- __btrfs_qgroup_release_data(reserved=@reserved, free=1)
         |- qgroup_free_reserved_data(reserved=@reserved)
            |- clear_record_extent_bits();
            |- freed += changeset.bytes_changed;

However due to a completion bug, qgroup_free_reserved_data() will clear
EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag in BTRFS_I(inode)->io_failure_tree, other
than the correct BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree.
Since io_failure_tree is never marked with that flag,
btrfs_qgroup_free_data() will not free any data reserved space at all,
causing a leakage.

This type of error handling can only be triggered by errors outside of
qgroup code. So EDQUOT error from qgroup can't trigger it.

[FIX]
Fix the wrong target io_tree.

Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Fixes: bc42bda223 ("btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup reserved space underflow by only freeing reserved ranges")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-27 15:24:28 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
fab2735955 btrfs: Fix a regression which we can't convert to SINGLE profile
[BUG]
With v5.3 kernel, we can't convert to SINGLE profile:

  # btrfs balance start -f -dconvert=single $mnt
  ERROR: error during balancing '/mnt/btrfs': Invalid argument
  # dmesg -t | tail
  validate_convert_profile: data profile=0x1000000000000 allowed=0x20 is_valid=1 final=0x1000000000000 ret=1
  BTRFS error (device dm-3): balance: invalid convert data profile single

[CAUSE]
With the extra debug output added, it shows that the @allowed bit is
lacking the special in-memory only SINGLE profile bit.

Thus we fail at that (profile & ~allowed) check.

This regression is caused by commit 081db89b13 ("btrfs: use raid_attr
to get allowed profiles for balance conversion") and the fact that we
don't use any bit to indicate SINGLE profile on-disk, but uses special
in-memory only bit to help distinguish different profiles.

[FIX]
Add that BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE to @allowed, so the code should be
the same as it was and fix the regression.

Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Fixes: 081db89b13 ("btrfs: use raid_attr to get allowed profiles for balance conversion")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.3+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-25 16:00:37 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
1fac4a5437 btrfs: relocation: fix use-after-free on dead relocation roots
[BUG]
One user reported a reproducible KASAN report about use-after-free:

  BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: start -dvrange=1256811659264..1256811659265
  BTRFS info (device sdi1): relocating block group 1256811659264 flags data|raid0
  ==================================================================
  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
  Write of size 8 at addr ffff88856f671710 by task kworker/u24:10/261579

  CPU: 2 PID: 261579 Comm: kworker/u24:10 Tainted: P           OE     5.2.11-arch1-1-kasan #4
  Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./X99 Extreme4, BIOS P3.80 04/06/2018
  Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs]
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x7b/0xba
   print_address_description+0x6c/0x22e
   ? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
   __kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x3b
   ? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
   kasan_report+0x12/0x17
   __asan_report_store8_noabort+0x17/0x20
   btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
   record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs]
   btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs]
   start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs]
   btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs]
   btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x7bf/0x18a0 [btrfs]
   ? lock_repin_lock+0x400/0x400
   ? __kmem_cache_shutdown.cold+0x140/0x1ad
   ? btrfs_unlink_subvol+0x9b0/0x9b0 [btrfs]
   finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs]
   normal_work_helper+0x1bd/0xca0 [btrfs]
   ? process_one_work+0x819/0x1720
   ? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
   process_one_work+0x8c9/0x1720
   ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2f0/0x2f0
   ? worker_thread+0x1d9/0x1030
   worker_thread+0x98/0x1030
   kthread+0x2bb/0x3b0
   ? process_one_work+0x1720/0x1720
   ? kthread_park+0x120/0x120
   ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

  Allocated by task 369692:
   __kasan_kmalloc.part.0+0x44/0xc0
   __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xba/0xc0
   kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10
   kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x138/0x260
   btrfs_read_tree_root+0x92/0x360 [btrfs]
   btrfs_read_fs_root+0x10/0xb0 [btrfs]
   create_reloc_root+0x47d/0xa10 [btrfs]
   btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x1e2/0x340 [btrfs]
   record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs]
   btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs]
   start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs]
   btrfs_start_transaction+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs]
   __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x1c2/0xa00 [btrfs]
   btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x13/0x20 [btrfs]
   prealloc_file_extent_cluster+0x29f/0x570 [btrfs]
   relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x193/0xc30 [btrfs]
   relocate_data_extent+0x1f8/0x490 [btrfs]
   relocate_block_group+0x600/0x1060 [btrfs]
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs]
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs]
   btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs]
   do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060
   ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0
   do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  Freed by task 369692:
   __kasan_slab_free+0x14f/0x210
   kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10
   kfree+0xd8/0x270
   btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x154c/0x1eb0 [btrfs]
   clean_dirty_subvols+0x227/0x340 [btrfs]
   relocate_block_group+0x972/0x1060 [btrfs]
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs]
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs]
   btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs]
   do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060
   ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0
   do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88856f671100
   which belongs to the cache kmalloc-4k of size 4096
  The buggy address is located 1552 bytes inside of
   4096-byte region [ffff88856f671100, ffff88856f672100)
  The buggy address belongs to the page:
  page:ffffea0015bd9c00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff88864400e600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
  flags: 0x2ffff0000010200(slab|head)
  raw: 02ffff0000010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000200 ffff88864400e600
  raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
  page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

  Memory state around the buggy address:
   ffff88856f671600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
   ffff88856f671680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
  >ffff88856f671700: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
                           ^
   ffff88856f671780: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
   ffff88856f671800: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
  ==================================================================
  BTRFS info (device sdi1): 1 enospc errors during balance
  BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: ended with status: -28

[CAUSE]
The problem happens when finish_ordered_io() get called with balance
still running, while the reloc root of that subvolume is already dead.
(Tree is swap already done, but tree not yet deleted for possible qgroup
usage.)

That means root->reloc_root still exists, but that reloc_root can be
under btrfs_drop_snapshot(), thus we shouldn't access it.

The following race could cause the use-after-free problem:

                CPU1              |                CPU2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  | relocate_block_group()
                                  | |- unset_reloc_control(rc)
                                  | |- btrfs_commit_transaction()
btrfs_finish_ordered_io()         | |- clean_dirty_subvols()
|- btrfs_join_transaction()       |    |
   |- record_root_in_trans()      |    |
      |- btrfs_init_reloc_root()  |    |
         |- if (root->reloc_root) |    |
         |                        |    |- root->reloc_root = NULL
         |                        |    |- btrfs_drop_snapshot(reloc_root);
         |- reloc_root->last_trans|
                 = trans->transid |
	    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
            Use after free

[FIX]
Fix it by the following modifications:

- Test if the root has dead reloc tree before accessing root->reloc_root
  If the root has BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, then we don't need to
  create or update root->reloc_tree

- Clear the BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE flag until we have fully dropped
  reloc tree
  To co-operate with above modification, so as long as
  BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE is still set, we won't try to re-create
  reloc tree at record_root_in_trans().

Reported-by: Cebtenzzre <cebtenzzre@gmail.com>
Fixes: d2311e6985 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-25 15:23:42 +02:00
Filipe Manana
13fc1d271a Btrfs: fix race setting up and completing qgroup rescan workers
There is a race between setting up a qgroup rescan worker and completing
a qgroup rescan worker that can lead to callers of the qgroup rescan wait
ioctl to either not wait for the rescan worker to complete or to hang
forever due to missing wake ups. The following diagram shows a sequence
of steps that illustrates the race.

        CPU 1                                                         CPU 2                                  CPU 3

 btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan()
  btrfs_qgroup_rescan()
   qgroup_rescan_init()
    mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
    spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)

    fs_info->qgroup_flags |=
      BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN

    init_completion(
      &fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion)

    fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = true

    mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
    spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)

    btrfs_init_work()
     --> starts the worker

                                                        btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker()
                                                         mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)

                                                         fs_info->qgroup_flags &=
                                                           ~BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN

                                                         mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)

                                                         starts transaction, updates qgroup status
                                                         item, etc

                                                                                                           btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan()
                                                                                                            btrfs_qgroup_rescan()
                                                                                                             qgroup_rescan_init()
                                                                                                              mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
                                                                                                              spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)

                                                                                                              fs_info->qgroup_flags |=
                                                                                                                BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN

                                                                                                              init_completion(
                                                                                                                &fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion)

                                                                                                              fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = true

                                                                                                              mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
                                                                                                              spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)

                                                                                                              btrfs_init_work()
                                                                                                               --> starts another worker

                                                         mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)

                                                         fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = false

                                                         mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)

							 complete_all(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion)

Before the rescan worker started by the task at CPU 3 completes, if
another task calls btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan(), it will get -EINPROGRESS
because the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN is set at
fs_info->qgroup_flags, which is expected and correct behaviour.

However if other task calls btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan_wait() before the
rescan worker started by the task at CPU 3 completes, it will return
immediately without waiting for the new rescan worker to complete,
because fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running is set to false by CPU 2.

This race is making test case btrfs/171 (from fstests) to fail often:

  btrfs/171 9s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad)
      --- tests/btrfs/171.out     2018-09-16 21:30:48.505104287 +0100
      +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad      2019-09-19 02:01:36.938486039 +0100
      @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
       QA output created by 171
      +ERROR: quota rescan failed: Operation now in progress
       Silence is golden
      ...
      (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/btrfs/171.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)

That is because the test calls the btrfs-progs commands "qgroup quota
rescan -w", "qgroup assign" and "qgroup remove" in a sequence that makes
calls to the rescan start ioctl fail with -EINPROGRESS (note the "btrfs"
commands 'qgroup assign' and 'qgroup remove' often call the rescan start
ioctl after calling the qgroup assign ioctl,
btrfs_ioctl_qgroup_assign()), since previous waits didn't actually wait
for a rescan worker to complete.

Another problem the race can cause is missing wake ups for waiters,
since the call to complete_all() happens outside a critical section and
after clearing the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN. In the sequence
diagram above, if we have a waiter for the first rescan task (executed
by CPU 2), then fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion.wait is not empty, and
if after the rescan worker clears BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN and
before it calls complete_all() against
fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion, the task at CPU 3 calls
init_completion() against fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion which
re-initilizes its wait queue to an empty queue, therefore causing the
rescan worker at CPU 2 to call complete_all() against an empty queue,
never waking up the task waiting for that rescan worker.

Fix this by clearing BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN and setting
fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running to false in the same critical section,
delimited by the mutex fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock, as well as doing the
call to complete_all() in that same critical section. This gives the
protection needed to avoid rescan wait ioctl callers not waiting for a
running rescan worker and the lost wake ups problem, since setting that
rescan flag and boolean as well as initializing the wait queue is done
already in a critical section delimited by that mutex (at
qgroup_rescan_init()).

Fixes: 57254b6ebc ("Btrfs: add ioctl to wait for qgroup rescan completion")
Fixes: d2c609b834 ("btrfs: properly track when rescan worker is running")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-24 16:38:53 +02:00
Filipe Manana
0607eb1d45 Btrfs: fix missing error return if writeback for extent buffer never started
If lock_extent_buffer_for_io() fails, it returns a negative value, but its
caller btree_write_cache_pages() ignores such error. This means that a
call to flush_write_bio(), from lock_extent_buffer_for_io(), might have
failed. We should make btree_write_cache_pages() notice such error values
and stop immediatelly, making sure filemap_fdatawrite_range() returns an
error to the transaction commit path. A failure from flush_write_bio()
should also result in the endio callback end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage()
being invoked, which sets the BTRFS_FS_*_ERR bits appropriately, so that
there's no risk a transaction or log commit doesn't catch a writeback
failure.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-24 14:45:23 +02:00
Dennis Zhou
eb5b64f142 btrfs: adjust dirty_metadata_bytes after writeback failure of extent buffer
Before, if a eb failed to write out, we would end up triggering a
BUG_ON(). As of f4340622e0 ("btrfs: extent_io: Move the BUG_ON() in
flush_write_bio() one level up"), we no longer BUG_ON(), so we should
make life consistent and add back the unwritten bytes to
dirty_metadata_bytes.

Fixes: f4340622e0 ("btrfs: extent_io: Move the BUG_ON() in flush_write_bio() one level up")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-24 14:45:11 +02:00
Filipe Manana
9f7fec0ba8 Btrfs: fix selftests failure due to uninitialized i_mode in test inodes
Some of the self tests create a test inode, setup some extents and then do
calls to btrfs_get_extent() to test that the corresponding extent maps
exist and are correct. However btrfs_get_extent(), since the 5.2 merge
window, now errors out when it finds a regular or prealloc extent for an
inode that does not correspond to a regular file (its ->i_mode is not
S_IFREG). This causes the self tests to fail sometimes, specially when
KASAN, slub_debug and page poisoning are enabled:

  $ modprobe btrfs
  modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'btrfs': Invalid argument

  $ dmesg
  [ 9414.691648] Btrfs loaded, crc32c=crc32c-intel, debug=on, assert=on, integrity-checker=on, ref-verify=on
  [ 9414.692655] BTRFS: selftest: sectorsize: 4096  nodesize: 4096
  [ 9414.692658] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs free space cache tests
  [ 9414.692918] BTRFS: selftest: running extent only tests
  [ 9414.693061] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap only tests
  [ 9414.693366] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap and extent tests
  [ 9414.696455] BTRFS: selftest: running space stealing from bitmap to extent tests
  [ 9414.697131] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer operation tests
  [ 9414.697133] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_split_item tests
  [ 9414.697564] BTRFS: selftest: running extent I/O tests
  [ 9414.697583] BTRFS: selftest: running find delalloc tests
  [ 9415.081125] BTRFS: selftest: running find_first_clear_extent_bit test
  [ 9415.081278] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer bitmap tests
  [ 9415.124192] BTRFS: selftest: running inode tests
  [ 9415.124195] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_get_extent tests
  [ 9415.127909] BTRFS: selftest: running hole first btrfs_get_extent test
  [ 9415.128343] BTRFS critical (device (efault)): regular/prealloc extent found for non-regular inode 256
  [ 9415.131428] BTRFS: selftest: fs/btrfs/tests/inode-tests.c:904 expected a real extent, got 0

This happens because the test inodes are created without ever initializing
the i_mode field of the inode, and neither VFS's new_inode() nor the btrfs
callback btrfs_alloc_inode() initialize the i_mode. Initialization of the
i_mode is done through the various callbacks used by the VFS to create
new inodes (regular files, directories, symlinks, tmpfiles, etc), which
all call btrfs_new_inode() which in turn calls inode_init_owner(), which
sets the inode's i_mode. Since the tests only uses new_inode() to create
the test inodes, the i_mode was never initialized.

This always happens on a VM I used with kasan, slub_debug and many other
debug facilities enabled. It also happened to someone who reported this
on bugzilla (on a 5.3-rc).

Fix this by setting i_mode to S_IFREG at btrfs_new_test_inode().

Fixes: 6bf9e4bd6a ("btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer dereference")
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204397
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-24 14:45:02 +02:00