Most MPTCP-level related fields are under the mptcp data lock
protection, but are written one-off without such lock at MPC
complete time, both for the client and the server
Leverage the mptcp_propagate_state() infrastructure to move such
initialization under the proper lock client-wise.
The server side critical init steps are done by
mptcp_subflow_fully_established(): ensure the caller properly held the
relevant lock, and avoid acquiring the same lock in the nested scopes.
There are no real potential races, as write access to such fields
is implicitly serialized by the MPTCP state machine; the primary
goal is consistency.
Fixes: d22f4988ff ("mptcp: process MP_CAPABLE data option")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Currently the socket level counter aggregating the received data
does not take in account the data received via fastopen.
Address the issue updating the counter as required.
Fixes: 38967f424b ("mptcp: track some aggregate data counters")
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023-send-net-next-20231023-2-v1-2-9dc60939d371@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In case of early fallback to TCP, subflow_syn_recv_sock() deletes
the subflow context before returning the newly allocated sock to
the caller.
The fastopen path does not cope with the above unconditionally
dereferencing the subflow context.
Fixes: 36b122baf6 ("mptcp: add subflow_v(4,6)_send_synack()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The send_synack() needs to be overridden for MPTCP to support TFO for
two reasons:
- There is not be enough space in the TCP options if the TFO cookie has
to be added in the SYN+ACK with other options: MSS (4), SACK OK (2),
Timestamps (10), Window Scale (3+1), TFO (10+2), MP_CAPABLE (12).
MPTCPv1 specs -- RFC 8684, section B.1 [1] -- suggest to drop the TCP
timestamps option in this case.
- The data received in the SYN has to be handled: the SKB can be
dequeued from the subflow sk and transferred to the MPTCP sk. Counters
need to be updated accordingly and the application can be notified at
the end because some bytes have been received.
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8684.html#section-b.1
Co-developed-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Co-developed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@shytyi.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
With fastopen in place, the first subflow socket is created before the
MPC handshake completes, and we need to properly initialize the sequence
numbers at MPC ACK reception.
Co-developed-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Co-developed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@shytyi.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
