Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Takashi Sakamoto
dfacca3986 ALSA: fireface: perform sequence replay for media clock recovery
This commit takes ALSA fireface driver to perform sequence replay for
media clock recovery.

The protocol specific to RME Fireface series is not compliant to
IEC 61883-1/6 since it has no CIP header, therefore presentation time
is not used for media clock recovery. The sequence of the number of data
blocks per packet is important.

I note that the device skips an isochronous cycle corresponding to an
empty packet or a NODATA packet in blocking transmission method of
IEC 61883-1/6. For sequence replay, the cycle is handled as receiving an
empty packet. Furthermore, it doesn't start packet transmission till
receiving any packet.

The sequence replay is tested with below models:

* Fireface 400
* Fireface 800
* Fireface 802

I note that it is better to initialize Fireface 400 in advance by
initialization transaction implemented in snd-fireface-ctl-service of
snd-firewire-ctl-services project. You can see whether initialized or
not by HOST LED on the device. Unless, the device often stops packet
transmission even if session starts.

I guess the sequence replay also works well with below models:

* Fireface UFX
* Fireface UCX

Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210531025103.17880-7-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2021-06-01 08:19:51 +02:00
Takashi Sakamoto
9a738ad1b1 ALSA: firewire-lib: process payload of isoc context according to packet descriptors
This commit changes each of data block processing layer so that it
receives list of packet descriptor.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-07-22 16:05:11 +02:00
Takashi Sakamoto
4731c672c9 ALSA: fireface: code refactoring for FF data block processing layer
This is code refactoring for FF data block processing layer so that
it can receive list of packet descriptor.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-07-22 16:05:10 +02:00
Takashi Sakamoto
d2c104a342 ALSA: firewire-lib: pass packet descriptor to data block processing layer
This commit changes signature of callback function to call data block
processing layer with packet descriptor. At present, the layer is called
per packet.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-07-22 16:05:06 +02:00
Takashi Sakamoto
600c8018df ALSA: firewire-lib: pass no syt information to data block processing layer
In a previous commit, the variable passed from packet streaming layer
for syt variable is useless. This commit obsoletes it.

In my future work, the syt information is passed to data block processing
layer by another way.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-07-22 16:05:01 +02:00
Takashi Sakamoto
ab75481202 ALSA: firewire-lib: pass data block counter to data block processing layer
This is a preparation for future commit that 'struct
amdtp_stream.data_block_count' does not represent the value of
data block count for current data block.

However, data block count is required for calculation of sequence index
in sequence-multiplied data channel. Some of data block processing layer
require it; e.g. for AM824 data block.

This commit passes data block count to the processing layer.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2019-07-22 16:04:57 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner
da607e1969 treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 345
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  licensed under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 88 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190530000437.521539229@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-06-05 17:37:08 +02:00
Mark Rutland
6aa7de0591 locking/atomics: COCCINELLE/treewide: Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() patterns to READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE()
Please do not apply this to mainline directly, instead please re-run the
coccinelle script shown below and apply its output.

For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in
preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the
former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of
ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't harmful, and changing them results in
churn.

However, for some features, the read/write distinction is critical to
correct operation. To distinguish these cases, separate read/write
accessors must be used. This patch migrates (most) remaining
ACCESS_ONCE() instances to {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), using the following
coccinelle script:

----
// Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() uses to equivalent READ_ONCE() and
// WRITE_ONCE()

// $ make coccicheck COCCI=/home/mark/once.cocci SPFLAGS="--include-headers" MODE=patch

virtual patch

@ depends on patch @
expression E1, E2;
@@

- ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2
+ WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2)

@ depends on patch @
expression E;
@@

- ACCESS_ONCE(E)
+ READ_ONCE(E)
----

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: shuah@kernel.org
Cc: snitzer@redhat.com
Cc: thor.thayer@linux.intel.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508792849-3115-19-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-25 11:01:08 +02:00
Takashi Sakamoto
6fb7db902b ALSA: fireface: add unique data processing layer
As long as investigating Fireface 400, format of payload of each
isochronous packet is not IEC 61883-1/6, thus its format of data block
is not AM824. The remarkable points of the format are:
 * The payload just consists of some data channels of quadlet size without
   CIP header.
 * Each data channels includes data aligned to little endian order.
 * One data channel consists of two parts; 8 bit ancillary field and 24 bit
   PCM frame.

Due to lack of CIP headers, rx/tx packets include no CIP headers and
different way to check packet discontinuity. For tx packet, the ancillary
field is used for counter. However, the way of counting is different
depending on positions of data channels. At 44.1 kHz, ancillary field in:
 * 1st/6th/9th/10th/14th/17th data channels: not used for this purpose.
 * 2nd/18th data channels: incremented every data block (0x00-0xff).
 * 3rd/4th/5th/11th/12th/13th data channels: incremented every 256 data
   blocks (0x00-0x07).
 * 7th/8th/15th/16th data channels: incremented per the number of data
   blocks in a packet. The increment can occur per packet (0x00-0xff).

For tx packet, tag of each isochronous packet is used for this purpose.
The value of tag cyclically changes between 0, 1, 2 and 3 in this order.
The interval is different depending on sampling transmission frequency.
At 44.1/48.0 kHz, it's 256 data blocks. At 88.2 kHz, it's 96 data blocks.

The number of data blocks in tx packet is exactly the same as
SYT_INTERVAL. There's no empty packet or no-data packet, thus the
throughput is not 8,000 packets per sec. On the other hand, the one in
rx packet is 8,000 packets per sec, thus the number of data blocks is
different between each packet, depending on sampling transmission
frequency:
 * 44.1 kHz: 5 or 6
 * 48.0 kHz: 5 or 6 or 7
 * 88.2 kHz: 10 or 11 or 12

This commit adds data processing layer to satisfy the above specification
in a policy of 'best effort'. Although PCM frames are handled for
intermediate buffer to user space, the ancillary data is not handled at all
to reduce CPU usage, thus counter is not checked. 0 is always used for tag
of isochronous packet. Furthermore, the packet streaming layer is
responsible for calculation of the number of data blocks for each packet,
thus it's not exactly the same sequence from the above observation.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
2017-04-05 21:31:42 +02:00