Commit graph

863 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mike Kravetz
7fb0728a9b hugetlb: fix __prep_compound_gigantic_page page flag setting
Commit 2b21624fc2 ("hugetlb: freeze allocated pages before creating
hugetlb pages") changed the order page flags were cleared and set in the
head page.  It moved the __ClearPageReserved after __SetPageHead. 
However, there is a check to make sure __ClearPageReserved is never done
on a head page.  If CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS is enabled, the following BUG
will be hit when creating a hugetlb gigantic page:

    page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(1 && PageCompound(page))
    ------------[ cut here ]------------
    kernel BUG at include/linux/page-flags.h:500!
    Call Trace will differ depending on whether hugetlb page is created
    at boot time or run time.

Make sure to __ClearPageReserved BEFORE __SetPageHead.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221118195249.178319-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Fixes: 2b21624fc2 ("hugetlb: freeze allocated pages before creating hugetlb pages")
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Tested-by: Tarun Sahu <tsahu@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-22 18:50:44 -08:00
James Houghton
8625147caf hugetlbfs: don't delete error page from pagecache
This change is very similar to the change that was made for shmem [1], and
it solves the same problem but for HugeTLBFS instead.

Currently, when poison is found in a HugeTLB page, the page is removed
from the page cache.  That means that attempting to map or read that
hugepage in the future will result in a new hugepage being allocated
instead of notifying the user that the page was poisoned.  As [1] states,
this is effectively memory corruption.

The fix is to leave the page in the page cache.  If the user attempts to
use a poisoned HugeTLB page with a syscall, the syscall will fail with
EIO, the same error code that shmem uses.  For attempts to map the page,
the thread will get a BUS_MCEERR_AR SIGBUS.

[1]: commit a760542666 ("mm: shmem: don't truncate page if memory failure happens")

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221018200125.848471-1-jthoughton@google.com
Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Tested-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-08 15:57:22 -08:00
Mike Kravetz
612b8a3170 hugetlb: fix memory leak associated with vma_lock structure
The hugetlb vma_lock structure hangs off the vm_private_data pointer of
sharable hugetlb vmas.  The structure is vma specific and can not be
shared between vmas.  At fork and various other times, vmas are duplicated
via vm_area_dup().  When this happens, the pointer in the newly created
vma must be cleared and the structure reallocated.  Two hugetlb specific
routines deal with this hugetlb_dup_vma_private and hugetlb_vm_op_open. 
Both routines are called for newly created vmas.  hugetlb_dup_vma_private
would always clear the pointer and hugetlb_vm_op_open would allocate the
new vms_lock structure.  This did not work in the case of this calling
sequence pointed out in [1].

  move_vma
    copy_vma
      new_vma = vm_area_dup(vma);
      new_vma->vm_ops->open(new_vma); --> new_vma has its own vma lock.
    is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)
      clear_vma_resv_huge_pages
        hugetlb_dup_vma_private --> vma->vm_private_data is set to NULL

When clearing hugetlb_dup_vma_private we actually leak the associated
vma_lock structure.

The vma_lock structure contains a pointer to the associated vma.  This
information can be used in hugetlb_dup_vma_private and hugetlb_vm_op_open
to ensure we only clear the vm_private_data of newly created (copied)
vmas.  In such cases, the vma->vma_lock->vma field will not point to the
vma.

Update hugetlb_dup_vma_private and hugetlb_vm_op_open to not clear
vm_private_data if vma->vma_lock->vma == vma.  Also, log a warning if
hugetlb_vm_op_open ever encounters the case where vma_lock has already
been correctly allocated for the vma.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/5154292a-4c55-28cd-0935-82441e512fc3@huawei.com/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221019201957.34607-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Fixes: 131a79b474 ("hugetlb: fix vma lock handling during split vma and range unmapping")
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-20 21:27:23 -07:00
Rik van Riel
12df140f0b mm,hugetlb: take hugetlb_lock before decrementing h->resv_huge_pages
The h->*_huge_pages counters are protected by the hugetlb_lock, but
alloc_huge_page has a corner case where it can decrement the counter
outside of the lock.

This could lead to a corrupted value of h->resv_huge_pages, which we have
observed on our systems.

Take the hugetlb_lock before decrementing h->resv_huge_pages to avoid a
potential race.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221017202505.0e6a4fcd@imladris.surriel.com
Fixes: a88c769548 ("mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong reserve count")
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Glen McCready <gkmccready@meta.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-20 21:27:23 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
5e714bf171 - Alistair Popple has a series which addresses a race which causes page
refcounting errors in ZONE_DEVICE pages.
 
 - Peter Xu fixes some userfaultfd test harness instability.
 
 - Various other patches in MM, mainly fixes.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iHUEABYKAB0WIQTTMBEPP41GrTpTJgfdBJ7gKXxAjgUCY0j6igAKCRDdBJ7gKXxA
 jnGxAP99bV39ZtOsoY4OHdZlWU16BUjKuf/cb3bZlC2G849vEwD+OKlij86SG20j
 MGJQ6TfULJ8f1dnQDd6wvDfl3FMl7Qc=
 =tbdp
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'mm-stable-2022-10-13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Pull more MM updates from Andrew Morton:

 - fix a race which causes page refcounting errors in ZONE_DEVICE pages
   (Alistair Popple)

 - fix userfaultfd test harness instability (Peter Xu)

 - various other patches in MM, mainly fixes

* tag 'mm-stable-2022-10-13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm: (29 commits)
  highmem: fix kmap_to_page() for kmap_local_page() addresses
  mm/page_alloc: fix incorrect PGFREE and PGALLOC for high-order page
  mm/selftest: uffd: explain the write missing fault check
  mm/hugetlb: use hugetlb_pte_stable in migration race check
  mm/hugetlb: fix race condition of uffd missing/minor handling
  zram: always expose rw_page
  LoongArch: update local TLB if PTE entry exists
  mm: use update_mmu_tlb() on the second thread
  kasan: fix array-bounds warnings in tests
  hmm-tests: add test for migrate_device_range()
  nouveau/dmem: evict device private memory during release
  nouveau/dmem: refactor nouveau_dmem_fault_copy_one()
  mm/migrate_device.c: add migrate_device_range()
  mm/migrate_device.c: refactor migrate_vma and migrate_deivce_coherent_page()
  mm/memremap.c: take a pgmap reference on page allocation
  mm: free device private pages have zero refcount
  mm/memory.c: fix race when faulting a device private page
  mm/damon: use damon_sz_region() in appropriate place
  mm/damon: move sz_damon_region to damon_sz_region
  lib/test_meminit: add checks for the allocation functions
  ...
2022-10-14 12:28:43 -07:00
Peter Xu
f9bf6c03ec mm/hugetlb: use hugetlb_pte_stable in migration race check
After hugetlb_pte_stable() introduced, we can also rewrite the migration
race condition against page allocation to use the new helper too.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221004193400.110155-3-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-12 18:51:50 -07:00
Peter Xu
2ea7ff1e39 mm/hugetlb: fix race condition of uffd missing/minor handling
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: Fix selftest failures with write check", v3.

Currently akpm mm-unstable fails with uffd hugetlb private mapping test
randomly on a write check.

The initial bisection of that points to the recent pmd unshare series, but
it turns out there's no direction relationship with the series but only
some timing change caused the race to start trigger.

The race should be fixed in patch 1.  Patch 2 is a trivial cleanup on the
similar race with hugetlb migrations, patch 3 comment on the write check
so when anyone read it again it'll be clear why it's there.


This patch (of 3):

After the recent rework patchset of hugetlb locking on pmd sharing,
kselftest for userfaultfd sometimes fails on hugetlb private tests with
unexpected write fault checks.

It turns out there's nothing wrong within the locking series regarding
this matter, but it could have changed the timing of threads so it can
trigger an old bug.

The real bug is when we call hugetlb_no_page() we're not with the pgtable
lock.  It means we're reading the pte values lockless.  It's perfectly
fine in most cases because before we do normal page allocations we'll take
the lock and check pte_same() again.  However before that, there are
actually two paths on userfaultfd missing/minor handling that may directly
move on with the fault process without checking the pte values.

It means for these two paths we may be generating an uffd message based on
an unstable pte, while an unstable pte can legally be anything as long as
the modifier holds the pgtable lock.

One example, which is also what happened in the failing kselftest and
caused the test failure, is that for private mappings wr-protection
changes can happen on one page.  While hugetlb_change_protection()
generally requires pte being cleared before being changed, then there can
be a race condition like:

        thread 1                              thread 2
        --------                              --------

      UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT                     hugetlb_fault
        hugetlb_change_protection
          pgtable_lock()
          huge_ptep_modify_prot_start
                                              pte==NULL
                                              hugetlb_no_page
                                                generate uffd missing event
                                                even if page existed!!
          huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit
          pgtable_unlock()

Fix this by rechecking the pte after pgtable lock for both userfaultfd
missing & minor fault paths.

This bug should have been around starting from uffd hugetlb introduced, so
attaching a Fixes to the commit.  Also attach another Fixes to the minor
support commit for easier tracking.

Note that userfaultfd is actually fine with false positives (e.g.  caused
by pte changed), but not wrong logical events (e.g.  caused by reading a
pte during changing).  The latter can confuse the userspace, so the
strictness is very much preferred.  E.g., MISSING event should never
happen on the page after UFFDIO_COPY has correctly installed the page and
returned.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221004193400.110155-1-peterx@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221004193400.110155-2-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: 1a1aad8a9b ("userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: add userfaultfd hugetlb hook")
Fixes: 7677f7fd8b ("userfaultfd: add minor fault registration mode")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Co-developed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-12 18:51:50 -07:00
Peter Xu
515778e2d7 mm/uffd: fix warning without PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP compiled in
When PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP not configured, it's still possible to reach pte
marker code and trigger an warning. Add a few CONFIG_PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP
ifdefs to make sure the code won't be reached when not compiled in.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YzeR+R6b4bwBlBHh@x1n
Fixes: b1f9e87686 ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reported-by: <syzbot+2b9b4f0895be09a6dec3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Edward Liaw <edliaw@google.com>
Cc: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-12 15:56:46 -07:00
Andrew Morton
acfac37851 mm/hugetlb.c: make __hugetlb_vma_unlock_write_put() static
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-12 15:56:45 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
1440f57602 Five hotfixes - three for nilfs2, two for MM. For are cc:stable, one is
not.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iHUEABYKAB0WIQTTMBEPP41GrTpTJgfdBJ7gKXxAjgUCY0YhtwAKCRDdBJ7gKXxA
 juJLAQDCa0g8sfe9cTw3PT1gRnn8gWLHEkMgUWVC/aBaqYFGeQEAta+g8muv9Tpd
 qODv0JARH4cwONKEA24Oql+A5RnI6gQ=
 =QZnW
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'mm-hotfixes-stable-2022-10-11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Pull misc hotfixes from Andrew Morton:
 "Five hotfixes - three for nilfs2, two for MM. For are cc:stable, one
  is not"

* tag 'mm-hotfixes-stable-2022-10-11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm:
  nilfs2: fix leak of nilfs_root in case of writer thread creation failure
  nilfs2: fix NULL pointer dereference at nilfs_bmap_lookup_at_level()
  nilfs2: fix use-after-free bug of struct nilfs_root
  mm/damon/core: initialize damon_target->list in damon_new_target()
  mm/hugetlb: fix races when looking up a CONT-PTE/PMD size hugetlb page
2022-10-12 11:16:58 -07:00
Baolin Wang
fac35ba763 mm/hugetlb: fix races when looking up a CONT-PTE/PMD size hugetlb page
On some architectures (like ARM64), it can support CONT-PTE/PMD size
hugetlb, which means it can support not only PMD/PUD size hugetlb (2M and
1G), but also CONT-PTE/PMD size(64K and 32M) if a 4K page size specified.

So when looking up a CONT-PTE size hugetlb page by follow_page(), it will
use pte_offset_map_lock() to get the pte entry lock for the CONT-PTE size
hugetlb in follow_page_pte().  However this pte entry lock is incorrect
for the CONT-PTE size hugetlb, since we should use huge_pte_lock() to get
the correct lock, which is mm->page_table_lock.

That means the pte entry of the CONT-PTE size hugetlb under current pte
lock is unstable in follow_page_pte(), we can continue to migrate or
poison the pte entry of the CONT-PTE size hugetlb, which can cause some
potential race issues, even though they are under the 'pte lock'.

For example, suppose thread A is trying to look up a CONT-PTE size hugetlb
page by move_pages() syscall under the lock, however antoher thread B can
migrate the CONT-PTE hugetlb page at the same time, which will cause
thread A to get an incorrect page, if thread A also wants to do page
migration, then data inconsistency error occurs.

Moreover we have the same issue for CONT-PMD size hugetlb in
follow_huge_pmd().

To fix above issues, rename the follow_huge_pmd() as follow_huge_pmd_pte()
to handle PMD and PTE level size hugetlb, which uses huge_pte_lock() to
get the correct pte entry lock to make the pte entry stable.

Mike said:

Support for CONT_PMD/_PTE was added with bb9dd3df8e ("arm64: hugetlb:
refactor find_num_contig()").  Patch series "Support for contiguous pte
hugepages", v4.  However, I do not believe these code paths were
executed until migration support was added with 5480280d3f ("arm64/mm:
enable HugeTLB migration for contiguous bit HugeTLB pages") I would go
with 5480280d3f for the Fixes: targe.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/635f43bdd85ac2615a58405da82b4d33c6e5eb05.1662017562.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Fixes: 5480280d3f ("arm64/mm: enable HugeTLB migration for contiguous bit HugeTLB pages")
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-11 19:05:44 -07:00
Mike Kravetz
bbff39cc6c hugetlb: allocate vma lock for all sharable vmas
The hugetlb vma lock was originally designed to synchronize pmd sharing. 
As such, it was only necessary to allocate the lock for vmas that were
capable of pmd sharing.  Later in the development cycle, it was discovered
that it could also be used to simplify fault/truncation races as described
in [1].  However, a subsequent change to allocate the lock for all vmas
that use the page cache was never made.  A fault/truncation race could
leave pages in a file past i_size until the file is removed.

Remove the previous restriction and allocate lock for all VM_MAYSHARE
vmas.  Warn in the unlikely event of allocation failure.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yxiv0SkMkZ0JWGGp@monkey/#t

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221005011707.514612-4-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Fixes: "hugetlb: clean up code checking for fault/truncation races"
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-07 14:28:40 -07:00
Mike Kravetz
ecfbd73387 hugetlb: take hugetlb vma_lock when clearing vma_lock->vma pointer
hugetlb file truncation/hole punch code may need to back out and take
locks in order in the routine hugetlb_unmap_file_folio().  This code could
race with vma freeing as pointed out in [1] and result in accessing a
stale vma pointer.  To address this, take the vma_lock when clearing the
vma_lock->vma pointer.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/01f10195-7088-4462-6def-909549c75ef4@huawei.com/

[mike.kravetz@oracle.com: address build issues]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yz5L1uxQYR1VqFtJ@monkey
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221005011707.514612-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Fixes: "hugetlb: use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization"
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-07 14:28:40 -07:00
Mike Kravetz
131a79b474 hugetlb: fix vma lock handling during split vma and range unmapping
Patch series "hugetlb: fixes for new vma lock series".

In review of the series "hugetlb: Use new vma lock for huge pmd sharing
synchronization", Miaohe Lin pointed out two key issues:

1) There is a race in the routine hugetlb_unmap_file_folio when locks
   are dropped and reacquired in the correct order [1].

2) With the switch to using vma lock for fault/truncate synchronization,
   we need to make sure lock exists for all VM_MAYSHARE vmas, not just
   vmas capable of pmd sharing.

These two issues are addressed here.  In addition, having a vma lock
present in all VM_MAYSHARE vmas, uncovered some issues around vma
splitting.  Those are also addressed.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/01f10195-7088-4462-6def-909549c75ef4@huawei.com/


This patch (of 3):

The hugetlb vma lock hangs off the vm_private_data field and is specific
to the vma.  When vm_area_dup() is called as part of vma splitting, the
vma lock pointer is copied to the new vma.  This will result in issues
such as double freeing of the structure.  Update the hugetlb open vm_ops
to allocate a new vma lock for the new vma.

The routine __unmap_hugepage_range_final unconditionally unset VM_MAYSHARE
to prevent subsequent pmd sharing.  hugetlb_vma_lock_free attempted to
anticipate this by checking both VM_MAYSHARE and VM_SHARED.  However, if
only VM_MAYSHARE was set we would miss the free.  With the introduction of
the vma lock, a vma can not participate in pmd sharing if vm_private_data
is NULL.  Instead of clearing VM_MAYSHARE in __unmap_hugepage_range_final,
free the vma lock to prevent sharing.  Also, update the sharing code to
make sure vma lock is indeed a condition for pmd sharing. 
hugetlb_vma_lock_free can then key off VM_MAYSHARE and not miss any vmas.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221005011707.514612-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221005011707.514612-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Fixes: "hugetlb: add vma based lock for pmd sharing"
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-07 14:28:40 -07:00
Xin Hao
8346d69d8b mm/hugetlb: add available_huge_pages() func
In hugetlb.c there are several places which compare the values of
'h->free_huge_pages' and 'h->resv_huge_pages', it looks a bit messy, so
add a new available_huge_pages() function to do these.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220922021929.98961-1-xhao@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:35 -07:00
Liu Shixin
958f32ce83 mm: hugetlb: fix UAF in hugetlb_handle_userfault
The vma_lock and hugetlb_fault_mutex are dropped before handling userfault
and reacquire them again after handle_userfault(), but reacquire the
vma_lock could lead to UAF[1,2] due to the following race,

hugetlb_fault
  hugetlb_no_page
    /*unlock vma_lock */
    hugetlb_handle_userfault
      handle_userfault
        /* unlock mm->mmap_lock*/
                                           vm_mmap_pgoff
                                             do_mmap
                                               mmap_region
                                                 munmap_vma_range
                                                   /* clean old vma */
        /* lock vma_lock again  <--- UAF */
    /* unlock vma_lock */

Since the vma_lock will unlock immediately after
hugetlb_handle_userfault(), let's drop the unneeded lock and unlock in
hugetlb_handle_userfault() to fix the issue.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000d5e00a05e834962e@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220921014457.1668-1-liuzixian4@huawei.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220923042113.137273-1-liushixin2@huawei.com
Fixes: 1a1aad8a9b ("userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: add userfaultfd hugetlb hook")
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+193f9cee8638750b23cf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Liu Zixian <liuzixian4@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[4.14+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:32 -07:00
Mike Kravetz
2b21624fc2 hugetlb: freeze allocated pages before creating hugetlb pages
When creating hugetlb pages, the hugetlb code must first allocate
contiguous pages from a low level allocator such as buddy, cma or
memblock.  The pages returned from these low level allocators are ref
counted.  This creates potential issues with other code taking speculative
references on these pages before they can be transformed to a hugetlb
page.  This issue has been addressed with methods and code such as that
provided in [1].

Recent discussions about vmemmap freeing [2] have indicated that it would
be beneficial to freeze all sub pages, including the head page of pages
returned from low level allocators before converting to a hugetlb page. 
This helps avoid races if we want to replace the page containing vmemmap
for the head page.

There have been proposals to change at least the buddy allocator to return
frozen pages as described at [3].  If such a change is made, it can be
employed by the hugetlb code.  However, as mentioned above hugetlb uses
several low level allocators so each would need to be modified to return
frozen pages.  For now, we can manually freeze the returned pages.  This
is done in two places:

1) alloc_buddy_huge_page, only the returned head page is ref counted.
   We freeze the head page, retrying once in the VERY rare case where
   there may be an inflated ref count.
2) prep_compound_gigantic_page, for gigantic pages the current code
   freezes all pages except the head page.  New code will simply freeze
   the head page as well.

In a few other places, code checks for inflated ref counts on newly
allocated hugetlb pages.  With the modifications to freeze after
allocating, this code can be removed.

After hugetlb pages are freshly allocated, they are often added to the
hugetlb free lists.  Since these pages were previously ref counted, this
was done via put_page() which would end up calling the hugetlb destructor:
free_huge_page.  With changes to freeze pages, we simply call
free_huge_page directly to add the pages to the free list.

In a few other places, freshly allocated hugetlb pages were immediately
put into use, and the expectation was they were already ref counted.  In
these cases, we must manually ref count the page.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210622021423.154662-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220802180309.19340-1-joao.m.martins@oracle.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220809171854.3725722-1-willy@infradead.org/

[mike.kravetz@oracle.com: fix NULL pointer dereference]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220921202702.106069-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220916214638.155744-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:31 -07:00
Mike Kravetz
fa27759af4 hugetlb: clean up code checking for fault/truncation races
With the new hugetlb vma lock in place, it can also be used to handle page
fault races with file truncation.  The lock is taken at the beginning of
the code fault path in read mode.  During truncation, it is taken in write
mode for each vma which has the file mapped.  The file's size (i_size) is
modified before taking the vma lock to unmap.

How are races handled?

The page fault code checks i_size early in processing after taking the vma
lock.  If the fault is beyond i_size, the fault is aborted.  If the fault
is not beyond i_size the fault will continue and a new page will be added
to the file.  It could be that truncation code modifies i_size after the
check in fault code.  That is OK, as truncation code will soon remove the
page.  The truncation code will wait until the fault is finished, as it
must obtain the vma lock in write mode.

This patch cleans up/removes late checks in the fault paths that try to
back out pages racing with truncation.  As noted above, we just let the
truncation code remove the pages.

[mike.kravetz@oracle.com: fix reserve_alloc set but not used compiler warning]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yyj7HsJWfHDoU24U@monkey
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914221810.95771-10-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:17 -07:00
Mike Kravetz
40549ba8f8 hugetlb: use new vma_lock for pmd sharing synchronization
The new hugetlb vma lock is used to address this race:

Faulting thread                                 Unsharing thread
...                                                  ...
ptep = huge_pte_offset()
      or
ptep = huge_pte_alloc()
...
                                                i_mmap_lock_write
                                                lock page table
ptep invalid   <------------------------        huge_pmd_unshare()
Could be in a previously                        unlock_page_table
sharing process or worse                        i_mmap_unlock_write
...

The vma_lock is used as follows:
- During fault processing. The lock is acquired in read mode before
  doing a page table lock and allocation (huge_pte_alloc).  The lock is
  held until code is finished with the page table entry (ptep).
- The lock must be held in write mode whenever huge_pmd_unshare is
  called.

Lock ordering issues come into play when unmapping a page from all
vmas mapping the page.  The i_mmap_rwsem must be held to search for the
vmas, and the vma lock must be held before calling unmap which will
call huge_pmd_unshare.  This is done today in:
- try_to_migrate_one and try_to_unmap_ for page migration and memory
  error handling.  In these routines we 'try' to obtain the vma lock and
  fail to unmap if unsuccessful.  Calling routines already deal with the
  failure of unmapping.
- hugetlb_vmdelete_list for truncation and hole punch.  This routine
  also tries to acquire the vma lock.  If it fails, it skips the
  unmapping.  However, we can not have file truncation or hole punch
  fail because of contention.  After hugetlb_vmdelete_list, truncation
  and hole punch call remove_inode_hugepages.  remove_inode_hugepages
  checks for mapped pages and call hugetlb_unmap_file_page to unmap them.
  hugetlb_unmap_file_page is designed to drop locks and reacquire in the
  correct order to guarantee unmap success.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914221810.95771-9-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:17 -07:00
Mike Kravetz
8d9bfb2608 hugetlb: add vma based lock for pmd sharing
Allocate a new hugetlb_vma_lock structure and hang off vm_private_data for
synchronization use by vmas that could be involved in pmd sharing.  This
data structure contains a rw semaphore that is the primary tool used for
synchronization.

This new structure is ref counted, so that it can exist when NOT attached
to a vma.  This is only helpful in resolving lock ordering issues where
code may need to obtain the vma_lock while there are no guarantees the vma
may go away.  By obtaining a ref on the structure, it can be guaranteed
that at least the rw semaphore will not go away.

Only add infrastructure for the new lock here.  Actual use will be added
in subsequent patches.

[mike.kravetz@oracle.com: fix build issue for missing hugetlb_vma_lock_release]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YyNUtA1vRASOE4+M@monkey
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914221810.95771-7-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:17 -07:00
Mike Kravetz
12710fd696 hugetlb: rename vma_shareable() and refactor code
Rename the routine vma_shareable to vma_addr_pmd_shareable as it is
checking a specific address within the vma.  Refactor code to check if an
aligned range is shareable as this will be needed in a subsequent patch.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914221810.95771-6-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:16 -07:00
Mike Kravetz
7e1813d48d hugetlb: rename remove_huge_page to hugetlb_delete_from_page_cache
remove_huge_page removes a hugetlb page from the page cache.  Change to
hugetlb_delete_from_page_cache as it is a more descriptive name. 
huge_add_to_page_cache is global in scope, but only deals with hugetlb
pages.  For consistency and clarity, rename to hugetlb_add_to_page_cache.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914221810.95771-4-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:16 -07:00
Mike Kravetz
3a47c54f09 hugetlbfs: revert use i_mmap_rwsem for more pmd sharing synchronization
Commit c0d0381ade ("hugetlbfs: use i_mmap_rwsem for more pmd sharing
synchronization") added code to take i_mmap_rwsem in read mode for the
duration of fault processing.  However, this has been shown to cause
performance/scaling issues.  Revert the code and go back to only taking
the semaphore in huge_pmd_share during the fault path.

Keep the code that takes i_mmap_rwsem in write mode before calling
try_to_unmap as this is required if huge_pmd_unshare is called.

NOTE: Reverting this code does expose the following race condition.

Faulting thread                                 Unsharing thread
...                                                  ...
ptep = huge_pte_offset()
      or
ptep = huge_pte_alloc()
...
                                                i_mmap_lock_write
                                                lock page table
ptep invalid   <------------------------        huge_pmd_unshare()
Could be in a previously                        unlock_page_table
sharing process or worse                        i_mmap_unlock_write
...
ptl = huge_pte_lock(ptep)
get/update pte
set_pte_at(pte, ptep)

It is unknown if the above race was ever experienced by a user.  It was
discovered via code inspection when initially addressed.

In subsequent patches, a new synchronization mechanism will be added to
coordinate pmd sharing and eliminate this race.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914221810.95771-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:16 -07:00
Mike Kravetz
188a39725a hugetlbfs: revert use i_mmap_rwsem to address page fault/truncate race
Patch series "hugetlb: Use new vma lock for huge pmd sharing
synchronization", v2.

hugetlb fault scalability regressions have recently been reported [1]. 
This is not the first such report, as regressions were also noted when
commit c0d0381ade ("hugetlbfs: use i_mmap_rwsem for more pmd sharing
synchronization") was added [2] in v5.7.  At that time, a proposal to
address the regression was suggested [3] but went nowhere.

The regression and benefit of this patch series is not evident when
using the vm_scalability benchmark reported in [2] on a recent kernel.
Results from running,
"./usemem -n 48 --prealloc --prefault -O -U 3448054972"

			48 sample Avg
next-20220913		next-20220913			next-20220913
unmodified	revert i_mmap_sema locking	vma sema locking, this series
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
498150 KB/s		501934 KB/s			504793 KB/s

The recent regression report [1] notes page fault and fork latency of
shared hugetlb mappings.  To measure this, I created two simple programs:
1) map a shared hugetlb area, write fault all pages, unmap area
   Do this in a continuous loop to measure faults per second
2) map a shared hugetlb area, write fault a few pages, fork and exit
   Do this in a continuous loop to measure forks per second
These programs were run on a 48 CPU VM with 320GB memory.  The shared
mapping size was 250GB.  For comparison, a single instance of the program
was run.  Then, multiple instances were run in parallel to introduce
lock contention.  Changing the locking scheme results in a significant
performance benefit.

test		instances	unmodified	revert		vma
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
faults per sec	1		393043		395680		389932
faults per sec  24		 71405		 81191		 79048
forks per sec   1		  2802		  2747		  2725
forks per sec   24		   439		   536		   500
Combined faults 24		  1621		 68070		 53662
Combined forks  24		   358		    67		   142

Combined test is when running both faulting program and forking program
simultaneously.

Patches 1 and 2 of this series revert c0d0381ade and 87bf91d39b which
depends on c0d0381ade.  Acquisition of i_mmap_rwsem is still required in
the fault path to establish pmd sharing, so this is moved back to
huge_pmd_share.  With c0d0381ade reverted, this race is exposed:

Faulting thread                                 Unsharing thread
...                                                  ...
ptep = huge_pte_offset()
      or
ptep = huge_pte_alloc()
...
                                                i_mmap_lock_write
                                                lock page table
ptep invalid   <------------------------        huge_pmd_unshare()
Could be in a previously                        unlock_page_table
sharing process or worse                        i_mmap_unlock_write
...
ptl = huge_pte_lock(ptep)
get/update pte
set_pte_at(pte, ptep)

Reverting 87bf91d39b exposes races in page fault/file truncation.  When
the new vma lock is put to use in patch 8, this will handle the fault/file
truncation races.  This is explained in patch 9 where code associated with
these races is cleaned up.

Patches 3 - 5 restructure existing code in preparation for using the new
vma lock (rw semaphore) for pmd sharing synchronization.  The idea is that
this semaphore will be held in read mode for the duration of fault
processing, and held in write mode for unmap operations which may call
huge_pmd_unshare.  Acquiring i_mmap_rwsem is also still required to
synchronize huge pmd sharing.  However it is only required in the fault
path when setting up sharing, and will be acquired in huge_pmd_share().

Patch 6 adds the new vma lock and all supporting routines, but does not
actually change code to use the new lock.

Patch 7 refactors code in preparation for using the new lock.  And, patch
8 finally adds code to make use of this new vma lock.  Unfortunately, the
fault code and truncate/hole punch code would naturally take locks in the
opposite order which could lead to deadlock.  Since the performance of
page faults is more important, the truncation/hole punch code is modified
to back out and take locks in the correct order if necessary.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/43faf292-245b-5db5-cce9-369d8fb6bd21@infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200622005551.GK5535@shao2-debian/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200706202615.32111-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com/


This patch (of 9):

Commit c0d0381ade ("hugetlbfs: use i_mmap_rwsem for more pmd sharing
synchronization") added code to take i_mmap_rwsem in read mode for the
duration of fault processing.  The use of i_mmap_rwsem to prevent
fault/truncate races depends on this.  However, this has been shown to
cause performance/scaling issues.  As a result, that code will be
reverted.  Since the use i_mmap_rwsem to address page fault/truncate races
depends on this, it must also be reverted.

In a subsequent patch, code will be added to detect the fault/truncate
race and back out operations as required.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914221810.95771-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914221810.95771-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:16 -07:00
XU pengfei
3259914f8c mm/hugetlb: remove unnecessary 'NULL' values from pointer
Pointer variables allocate memory first, and then judge.  There is no need
to initialize the assignment.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914012113.6271-1-xupengfei@nfschina.com
Signed-off-by: XU pengfei <xupengfei@nfschina.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:15 -07:00
Muchun Song
a4a00b451e mm: hugetlb: eliminate memory-less nodes handling
The memory-notify-based approach aims to handle meory-less nodes, however,
it just adds the complexity of code as pointed by David in thread [1]. 
The handling of memory-less nodes is introduced by commit 4faf8d950e
("hugetlb: handle memory hot-plug events").  >From its commit message, we
cannot find any necessity of handling this case.  So, we can simply
register/unregister sysfs entries in register_node/unregister_node to
simlify the code.

BTW, hotplug callback added because in hugetlb_register_all_nodes() we
register sysfs nodes only for N_MEMORY nodes, seeing commit 9b5e5d0fdc,
which said it was a preparation for handling memory-less nodes via memory
hotplug.  Since we want to remove memory hotplug, so make sure we only
register per-node sysfs for online (N_ONLINE) nodes in
hugetlb_register_all_nodes().

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/60933ffc-b850-976c-78a0-0ee6e0ea9ef0@redhat.com/ [1]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914072603.60293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:15 -07:00
Muchun Song
b958d4d08f mm: hugetlb: simplify per-node sysfs creation and removal
Patch series "simplify handling of per-node sysfs creation and removal",
v4.


This patch (of 2):

The following commit offload per-node sysfs creation and removal to a
kworker and did not say why it is needed.  And it also said "I don't know
that this is absolutely required".  It seems like the author was not sure
as well.  Since it only complicates the code, this patch will revert the
changes to simplify the code.

  39da08cb07 ("hugetlb: offload per node attribute registrations")

We could use memory hotplug notifier to do per-node sysfs creation and
removal instead of inserting those operations to node registration and
unregistration.  Then, it can reduce the code coupling between node.c and
hugetlb.c.  Also, it can simplify the code.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914072603.60293-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914072603.60293-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:15 -07:00
Cheng Li
14455eabd8 mm: use nth_page instead of mem_map_offset mem_map_next
To handle the discontiguous case, mem_map_next() has a parameter named
`offset`.  As a function caller, one would be confused why "get next
entry" needs a parameter named "offset".  The other drawback of
mem_map_next() is that the callers must take care of the map between
parameter "iter" and "offset", otherwise we may get an hole or duplication
during iteration.  So we use nth_page instead of mem_map_next.

And replace mem_map_offset with nth_page() per Matthew's comments.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1662708669-9395-1-git-send-email-lic121@chinatelecom.cn
Signed-off-by: Cheng Li <lic121@chinatelecom.cn>
Fixes: 69d177c2fc ("hugetlbfs: handle pages higher order than MAX_ORDER")
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:03:08 -07:00
Li zeming
8eeda55fe0 mm/hugetlb.c: remove unnecessary initialization of local `err'
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220905020918.3552-1-zeming@nfschina.com
Signed-off-by: Li zeming <zeming@nfschina.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03 14:02:55 -07:00
Andrew Morton
6d751329e7 Merge branch 'mm-hotfixes-stable' into mm-stable 2022-09-26 13:13:15 -07:00
Doug Berger
317314527d mm/hugetlb: correct demote page offset logic
With gigantic pages it may not be true that struct page structures are
contiguous across the entire gigantic page.  The nth_page macro is used
here in place of direct pointer arithmetic to correct for this.

Mike said:

: This error could cause addressing exceptions.  However, this is only
: possible in configurations where CONFIG_SPARSEMEM &&
: !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP.  Such a configuration option is rare and
: unknown to be the default anywhere.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914190917.3517663-1-opendmb@gmail.com
Fixes: 8531fc6f52 ("hugetlb: add hugetlb demote page support")
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26 12:14:34 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
5e6b1bf1b5 hugetlb: remove meaningless BUG_ON(huge_pte_none())
When code reaches here, invalid page would have been accessed if huge pte
is none. So this BUG_ON(huge_pte_none()) is meaningless. Remove it.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901120030.63318-10-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:26:10 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
a9e1eab241 hugetlb: add comment for subtle SetHPageVmemmapOptimized()
The SetHPageVmemmapOptimized() called here seems unnecessary as it's
assumed to be set when calling this function. But it's indeed cleared
by above set_page_private(page, 0). Add a comment to avoid possible
future confusion.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901120030.63318-9-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:26:10 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
29be84265f hugetlb: kill hugetlbfs_pagecache_page()
Fold hugetlbfs_pagecache_page() into its sole caller to remove some
duplicated code. No functional change intended.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901120030.63318-8-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:26:09 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
12658abfc5 hugetlb: pass NULL to kobj_to_hstate() if nid is unused
We can pass NULL to kobj_to_hstate() directly when nid is unused to
simplify the code. No functional change intended.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901120030.63318-7-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:26:09 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
bcc665436f hugetlb: use helper {huge_pte|pmd}_lock()
Use helper huge_pte_lock and pmd_lock to simplify the code. No functional
change intended.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901120030.63318-6-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:26:09 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
103956805c hugetlb: use sizeof() to get the array size
It's better to use sizeof() to get the array size instead of manual
calculation. Minor readability improvement.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901120030.63318-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:26:09 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
3466534131 hugetlb: use LIST_HEAD() to define a list head
Use LIST_HEAD() directly to define a list head to simplify the code.
No functional change intended.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901120030.63318-4-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:26:09 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
c2c3a60a85 hugetlb: Use helper macro SZ_1K
Use helper macro SZ_1K to do the size conversion to make code more
consistent in this file. Minor readability improvement.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901120030.63318-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:26:08 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
263b899802 hugetlb: make hugetlb_cma_check() static
Patch series "A few cleanup patches for hugetlb", v2.

This series contains a few cleanup patches to use helper functions to
simplify the codes, remove unneeded nid parameter and so on. More
details can be found in the respective changelogs.


This patch (of 10):

Make hugetlb_cma_check() static as it's only used inside mm/hugetlb.c.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901120030.63318-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220901120030.63318-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:26:08 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
3aa4ed8040 mm/hugetlb: make detecting shared pte more reliable
If the pagetables are shared, we shouldn't copy or take references.  Since
src could have unshared and dst shares with another vma, huge_pte_none()
is thus used to determine whether dst_pte is shared.  But this check isn't
reliable.  A shared pte could have pte none in pagetable in fact.  The
page count of ptep page should be checked here in order to reliably
determine whether pte is shared.

[lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com: remove unused local variable dst_entry in copy_hugetlb_page_range()]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220822082525.26071-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220816130553.31406-7-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:25:55 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
01088a6036 mm/hugetlb: fix sysfs group leak in hugetlb_unregister_node()
The sysfs group per_node_hstate_attr_group and hstate_demote_attr_group
when h->demote_order != 0 are created in hugetlb_register_node().  But
these sysfs groups are not removed when unregister the node, thus sysfs
group is leaked.  Using sysfs_remove_group() to fix this issue.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220816130553.31406-6-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Fengwei Yin <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:25:55 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
3a5497a2da mm/hugetlb: fix missing call to restore_reserve_on_error()
When huge_add_to_page_cache() fails, the page is freed directly without
calling restore_reserve_on_error() to restore reserve for newly allocated
pages not in page cache.  Fix this by calling restore_reserve_on_error()
when huge_add_to_page_cache fails.

[linmiaohe@huawei.com: remove err == -EEXIST check and retry logic]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220823030209.57434-4-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220816130553.31406-4-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:25:55 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
3a6bdda0b5 mm/hugetlb: fix WARN_ON(!kobj) in sysfs_create_group()
If sysfs_create_group() fails with hstate_attr_group, hstate_kobjs[hi]
will be set to NULL.  Then it will be passed to sysfs_create_group() if
h->demote_order != 0 thus triggering WARN_ON(!kobj) check.  Fix this by
making sure hstate_kobjs[hi] != NULL when calling sysfs_create_group.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220816130553.31406-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: 79dfc69552 ("hugetlb: add demote hugetlb page sysfs interfaces")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:25:55 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
a43a83c79b mm/hugetlb: fix incorrect update of max_huge_pages
Patch series "A few fixup patches for hugetlb".

This series contains a few fixup patches to fix incorrect update of
max_huge_pages, fix WARN_ON(!kobj) in sysfs_create_group() and so on.
More details can be found in the respective changelogs.


This patch (of 6):

There should be pages_per_huge_page(h) /
pages_per_huge_page(target_hstate) pages incremented for
target_hstate->max_huge_pages when page is demoted.  Update max_huge_pages
accordingly for consistency.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220816130553.31406-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220816130553.31406-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:25:54 -07:00
Feng Tang
d2226ebd54 mm/hugetlb: add dedicated func to get 'allowed' nodemask for current process
Muchun Song found that after MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY policy was introduced in
commit b27abaccf8 ("mm/mempolicy: add MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY for multiple
preferred nodes"), the policy_nodemask_current()'s semantics for this new
policy has been changed, which returns 'preferred' nodes instead of
'allowed' nodes.

With the changed semantic of policy_nodemask_current, a task with
MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY policy could fail to get its reservation even though
it can fall back to other nodes (either defined by cpusets or all online
nodes) for that reservation failing mmap calles unnecessarily early.

The fix is to not consider MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY for reservations at all
because they, unlike MPOL_MBIND, do not pose any actual hard constrain.

Michal suggested the policy_nodemask_current() is only used by hugetlb,
and could be moved to hugetlb code with more explicit name to enforce the
'allowed' semantics for which only MPOL_BIND policy matters.

apply_policy_zone() is made extern to be called in hugetlb code and its
return value is changed to bool.

[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220801084207.39086-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/t/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220805005903.95563-1-feng.tang@intel.com
Fixes: b27abaccf8 ("mm/mempolicy: add MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY for multiple preferred nodes")
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Reported-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-11 20:25:50 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
ab74ef708d mm/hugetlb: avoid corrupting page->mapping in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte
In MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE case with a non-shared VMA, pages in the page
cache are installed in the ptes.  But hugepage_add_new_anon_rmap is called
for them mistakenly because they're not vm_shared.  This will corrupt the
page->mapping used by page cache code.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220712130542.18836-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: f619147104 ("userfaultfd: add UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-28 14:02:43 -07:00
David Hildenbrand
1d8d14641f mm/hugetlb: support write-faults in shared mappings
If we ever get a write-fault on a write-protected page in a shared
mapping, we'd be in trouble (again).  Instead, we can simply map the page
writable.

And in fact, there is even a way right now to trigger that code via
uffd-wp ever since we stared to support it for shmem in 5.19:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <sys/mman.h>
 #include <sys/syscall.h>
 #include <sys/ioctl.h>
 #include <linux/userfaultfd.h>

 #define HUGETLB_SIZE (2 * 1024 * 1024u)

 static char *map;
 int uffd;

 static int temp_setup_uffd(void)
 {
 	struct uffdio_api uffdio_api;
 	struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
 	struct uffdio_writeprotect uffd_writeprotect;
 	struct uffdio_range uffd_range;

 	uffd = syscall(__NR_userfaultfd,
 		       O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK | UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY);
 	if (uffd < 0) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "syscall() failed: %d\n", errno);
 		return -errno;
 	}

 	uffdio_api.api = UFFD_API;
 	uffdio_api.features = UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP;
 	if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api) < 0) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "UFFDIO_API failed: %d\n", errno);
 		return -errno;
 	}

 	if (!(uffdio_api.features & UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP)) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "UFFD_FEATURE_WRITEPROTECT missing\n");
 		return -ENOSYS;
 	}

 	/* Register UFFD-WP */
 	uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) map;
 	uffdio_register.range.len = HUGETLB_SIZE;
 	uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP;
 	if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register) < 0) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "UFFDIO_REGISTER failed: %d\n", errno);
 		return -errno;
 	}

 	/* Writeprotect a single page. */
 	uffd_writeprotect.range.start = (unsigned long) map;
 	uffd_writeprotect.range.len = HUGETLB_SIZE;
 	uffd_writeprotect.mode = UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT_MODE_WP;
 	if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, &uffd_writeprotect)) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT failed: %d\n", errno);
 		return -errno;
 	}

 	/* Unregister UFFD-WP without prior writeunprotection. */
 	uffd_range.start = (unsigned long) map;
 	uffd_range.len = HUGETLB_SIZE;
 	if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER, &uffd_range)) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "UFFDIO_UNREGISTER failed: %d\n", errno);
 		return -errno;
 	}

 	return 0;
 }

 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	int fd;

 	fd = open("/dev/hugepages/tmp", O_RDWR | O_CREAT);
 	if (!fd) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "open() failed\n");
 		return -errno;
 	}
 	if (ftruncate(fd, HUGETLB_SIZE)) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "ftruncate() failed\n");
 		return -errno;
 	}

 	map = mmap(NULL, HUGETLB_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
 	if (map == MAP_FAILED) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "mmap() failed\n");
 		return -errno;
 	}

 	*map = 0;

 	if (temp_setup_uffd())
 		return 1;

 	*map = 0;

 	return 0;
 }
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Above test fails with SIGBUS when there is only a single free hugetlb page.
 # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
 # ./test
 Bus error (core dumped)

And worse, with sufficient free hugetlb pages it will map an anonymous page
into a shared mapping, for example, messing up accounting during unmap
and breaking MAP_SHARED semantics:
 # echo 2 > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
 # ./test
 # cat /proc/meminfo | grep HugePages_
 HugePages_Total:       2
 HugePages_Free:        1
 HugePages_Rsvd:    18446744073709551615
 HugePages_Surp:        0

Reason is that uffd-wp doesn't clear the uffd-wp PTE bit when
unregistering and consequently keeps the PTE writeprotected.  Reason for
this is to avoid the additional overhead when unregistering.  Note that
this is the case also for !hugetlb and that we will end up with writable
PTEs that still have the uffd-wp PTE bit set once we return from
hugetlb_wp().  I'm not touching the uffd-wp PTE bit for now, because it
seems to be a generic thing -- wp_page_reuse() also doesn't clear it.

VM_MAYSHARE handling in hugetlb_fault() for FAULT_FLAG_WRITE indicates
that MAP_SHARED handling was at least envisioned, but could never have
worked as expected.

While at it, make sure that we never end up in hugetlb_wp() on write
faults without VM_WRITE, because we don't support maybe_mkwrite()
semantics as commonly used in the !hugetlb case -- for example, in
wp_page_reuse().

Note that there is no need to do any kind of reservation in
hugetlb_fault() in this case ...  because we already have a hugetlb page
mapped R/O that we will simply map writable and we are not dealing with
COW/unsharing.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220811103435.188481-3-david@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e87686 ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jamie Liu <jamieliu@google.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[5.19]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-20 15:17:45 -07:00
Naoya Horiguchi
161df60e9e mm, hwpoison, hugetlb: support saving mechanism of raw error pages
When handling memory error on a hugetlb page, the error handler tries to
dissolve and turn it into 4kB pages.  If it's successfully dissolved,
PageHWPoison flag is moved to the raw error page, so that's all right. 
However, dissolve sometimes fails, then the error page is left as
hwpoisoned hugepage.  It's useful if we can retry to dissolve it to save
healthy pages, but that's not possible now because the information about
where the raw error pages is lost.

Use the private field of a few tail pages to keep that information.  The
code path of shrinking hugepage pool uses this info to try delayed
dissolve.  In order to remember multiple errors in a hugepage, a
singly-linked list originated from SUBPAGE_INDEX_HWPOISON-th tail page is
constructed.  Only simple operations (adding an entry or clearing all) are
required and the list is assumed not to be very long, so this simple data
structure should be enough.

If we failed to save raw error info, the hwpoison hugepage has errors on
unknown subpage, then this new saving mechanism does not work any more, so
disable saving new raw error info and freeing hwpoison hugepages.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220714042420.1847125-4-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-08 18:06:44 -07:00
Naoya Horiguchi
3a194f3f8a mm/hugetlb: make pud_huge() and follow_huge_pud() aware of non-present pud entry
follow_pud_mask() does not support non-present pud entry now.  As long as
I tested on x86_64 server, follow_pud_mask() still simply returns
no_page_table() for non-present_pud_entry() due to pud_bad(), so no severe
user-visible effect should happen.  But generally we should call
follow_huge_pud() for non-present pud entry for 1GB hugetlb page.

Update pud_huge() and follow_huge_pud() to handle non-present pud entries.
The changes are similar to previous works for pud entries commit
e66f17ff71 ("mm/hugetlb: take page table lock in follow_huge_pmd()") and
commit cbef8478be ("mm/hugetlb: pmd_huge() returns true for non-present
hugepage").

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220714042420.1847125-3-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-08 18:06:43 -07:00