Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nick Desaulniers
9b472e85d0 gcov: clang: drop support for clang-10 and older
LLVM changed the expected function signatures for llvm_gcda_start_file()
and llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11 release.  Drop the older
implementations and require folks to upgrade their compiler if they're
interested in GCOV support.

Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/rGcdd683b516d147925212724b09ec6fb792a40041
Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG13a633b438b6500ecad9e4f936ebadf3411d0f44
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210312224132.3413602-3-ndesaulniers@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210413183113.2977432-1-ndesaulniers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Cc: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-07 00:26:32 -07:00
Johannes Berg
1391efa952 gcov: use kvmalloc()
Using vmalloc() in gcov is really quite wasteful, many of the objects
allocated are really small (e.g.  I've seen 24 bytes.) Use kvmalloc() to
automatically pick the better of kmalloc() or vmalloc() depending on the
size.

[johannes.berg@intel.com: fix clang-11+ build]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210412214210.6e1ecca9cdc5.I24459763acf0591d5e6b31c7e3a59890d802f79c@changeid

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210315235453.799e7a9d627d.I741d0db096c6f312910f7f1bcdfde0fda20801a4@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-07 00:26:32 -07:00
Johannes Berg
7a1d55b987 gcov: combine common code
There's a lot of duplicated code between gcc and clang implementations,
move it over to fs.c to simplify the code, there's no reason to believe
that for small data like this one would not just implement the simple
convert_to_gcda() function.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210315235453.e3fbb86e99a0.I08a3ee6dbe47ea3e8024956083f162884a958e40@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-07 00:26:32 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
7af0814097 Revert "gcov: clang: fix clang-11+ build"
This reverts commit 04c53de57c.

Nathan Chancellor points out that it should not have been merged into
mainline by itself. It was a fix for "gcov: use kvmalloc()", which is
still in -mm/-next. Merging it alone has broken the build.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration2/runs/2384465683?check_suite_focus=true
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-04-19 15:08:49 -07:00
Johannes Berg
04c53de57c gcov: clang: fix clang-11+ build
With clang-11+, the code is broken due to my kvmalloc() conversion
(which predated the clang-11 support code) leaving one vmalloc() in
place.  Fix that.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210412214210.6e1ecca9cdc5.I24459763acf0591d5e6b31c7e3a59890d802f79c@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-04-16 16:10:37 -07:00
Nick Desaulniers
9562fd1329 gcov: re-fix clang-11+ support
LLVM changed the expected function signature for llvm_gcda_emit_function()
in the clang-11 release.  Users of clang-11 or newer may have noticed
their kernels producing invalid coverage information:

  $ llvm-cov gcov -a -c -u -f -b <input>.gcda -- gcno=<input>.gcno
  1 <func>: checksum mismatch, \
    (<lineno chksum A>, <cfg chksum B>) != (<lineno chksum A>, <cfg chksum C>)
  2 Invalid .gcda File!
  ...

Fix up the function signatures so calling this function interprets its
parameters correctly and computes the correct cfg checksum.  In
particular, in clang-11, the additional checksum is no longer optional.

Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG25544ce2df0daa4304c07e64b9c8b0f7df60c11d
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210408184631.1156669-1-ndesaulniers@google.com
Reported-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>
Tested-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[5.4+]

Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-04-09 14:54:23 -07:00
Nick Desaulniers
60bcf728ee gcov: fix clang-11+ support
LLVM changed the expected function signatures for llvm_gcda_start_file()
and llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11 release.  Users of
clang-11 or newer may have noticed their kernels failing to boot due to
a panic when enabling CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL=y +CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL=y.
Fix up the function signatures so calling these functions doesn't panic
the kernel.

Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/rGcdd683b516d147925212724b09ec6fb792a40041
Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG13a633b438b6500ecad9e4f936ebadf3411d0f44
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210312224132.3413602-2-ndesaulniers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reported-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>
Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[5.4+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-25 09:22:55 -07:00
Greg Hackmann
e178a5beb3 gcov: clang support
LLVM uses profiling data that's deliberately similar to GCC, but has a
very different way of exporting that data.  LLVM calls llvm_gcov_init()
once per module, and provides a couple of callbacks that we can use to
ask for more data.

We care about the "writeout" callback, which in turn calls back into
compiler-rt/this module to dump all the gathered coverage data to disk:

   llvm_gcda_start_file()
     llvm_gcda_emit_function()
     llvm_gcda_emit_arcs()
     llvm_gcda_emit_function()
     llvm_gcda_emit_arcs()
     [... repeats for each function ...]
   llvm_gcda_summary_info()
   llvm_gcda_end_file()

This design is much more stateless and unstructured than gcc's, and is
intended to run at process exit.  This forces us to keep some local
state about which module we're dealing with at the moment.  On the other
hand, it also means we don't depend as much on how LLVM represents
profiling data internally.

See LLVM's lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/GCOVProfiling.cpp for more
details on how this works, particularly GCOVProfiler::emitProfileArcs(),
GCOVProfiler::insertCounterWriteout(), and GCOVProfiler::insertFlush().

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190417225328.208129-1-trong@android.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tri Vo <trong@android.com>
Co-developed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Co-developed-by: Tri Vo <trong@android.com>
Tested-by: Trilok Soni <tsoni@quicinc.com>
Tested-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>
Tested-by: Tri Vo <trong@android.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Tested-by: Petri Gynther <pgynther@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-05-14 19:52:51 -07:00