When kernel is booted with idle=nomwait do not use MWAIT as the
default idle state.
If the user boots the kernel with idle=nomwait, it is a clear
direction to not use mwait as the default idle state.
However, the current code does not take this into consideration
while selecting the default idle state on x86.
Fix it by checking for the idle=nomwait boot option in
prefer_mwait_c1_over_halt().
Also update the documentation around idle=nomwait appropriately.
[ dhansen: tweak commit message ]
Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/fdc2dc2d0a1bc21c2f53d989ea2d2ee3ccbc0dbe.1654538381.git-series.wyes.karny@amd.com
There are two descriptions of the TEO (Timer Events Oriented) cpuidle
governor in the kernel source tree, one in the C file containing its
code and one in cpuidle.rst which is part of admin-guide.
Instead of trying to keep them both in sync and in order to reduce
text duplication, include the governor description from the C file
directly into cpuidle.rst.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* pm-cpuidle:
cpuidle: record state entry rejection statistics
cpuidle: psci: Allow PM domain to be initialized even if no OSI mode
firmware: psci: Extend psci_set_osi_mode() to allow reset to PC mode
ACPI: processor: Print more information when acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() fails
cpuidle: tegra: Correctly handle result of arm_cpuidle_simple_enter()
Fix a reStructuredText syntax error in the cpuidle PM admin-guide
documentation: the ``...'' quotation marks are parsed as partial ''...''
reStructuredText markup and break the output formatting.
This change them to "...".
Signed-off-by: Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@smile.fr>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
CPUs may fail to enter the chosen idle state if there was a
pending interrupt, causing the cpuidle driver to return an error
value.
Record that and export it via sysfs along with the other idle state
statistics.
This could prove useful in understanding behavior of the governor
and the system during usecases that involve multiple CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
[ rjw: Changelog and documentation edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Update the document after the remove of cpuidle_sysfs_switch.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Update the PM QoS documentation to reflect the previous code changes
regarding the removal of PM QoS classes and the CPU latency QoS API
rework.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Clean up the language in one paragraph in the PM QoS description in
Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In certain situations it may be useful to prevent some idle states
from being used by default while allowing user space to enable them
later on.
For this purpose, introduce a new state flag, CPUIDLE_FLAG_OFF, to
mark idle states that should be disabled by default, make the core
set CPUIDLE_STATE_DISABLED_BY_USER for those states at the
initialization time and add a new state attribute in sysfs,
"default_status", to inform user space of the initial status of
the given idle state ("disabled" if CPUIDLE_FLAG_OFF is set for it,
"enabled" otherwise).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Unify copyright notices in the .rst files under
Documentation/driver-api/pm and Documentation/admin-quide/pm.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Add SPDX license tags to .rst files under Documentation/driver-api/pm
and Documentation/admin-quide/pm.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
The venerable menu governor does some things that are quite
questionable in my view.
First, it includes timer wakeups in the pattern detection data and
mixes them up with wakeups from other sources which in some cases
causes it to expect what essentially would be a timer wakeup in a
time frame in which no timer wakeups are possible (because it knows
the time until the next timer event and that is later than the
expected wakeup time).
Second, it uses the extra exit latency limit based on the predicted
idle duration and depending on the number of tasks waiting on I/O,
even though those tasks may run on a different CPU when they are
woken up. Moreover, the time ranges used by it for the sleep length
correction factors depend on whether or not there are tasks waiting
on I/O, which again doesn't imply anything in particular, and they
are not correlated to the list of available idle states in any way
whatever.
Also, the pattern detection code in menu may end up considering
values that are too large to matter at all, in which cases running
it is a waste of time.
A major rework of the menu governor would be required to address
these issues and the performance of at least some workloads (tuned
specifically to the current behavior of the menu governor) is likely
to suffer from that. It is thus better to introduce an entirely new
governor without them and let everybody use the governor that works
better with their actual workloads.
The new governor introduced here, the timer events oriented (TEO)
governor, uses the same basic strategy as menu: it always tries to
find the deepest idle state that can be used in the given conditions.
However, it applies a different approach to that problem.
First, it doesn't use "correction factors" for the time till the
closest timer, but instead it tries to correlate the measured idle
duration values with the available idle states and use that
information to pick up the idle state that is most likely to "match"
the upcoming CPU idle interval.
Second, it doesn't take the number of "I/O waiters" into account at
all and the pattern detection code in it avoids taking timer wakeups
into account. It also only uses idle duration values less than the
current time till the closest timer (with the tick excluded) for that
purpose.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Add two new metrics for CPU idle states, "above" and "below", to count
the number of times the given state had been asked for (or entered
from the kernel's perspective), but the observed idle duration turned
out to be too short or too long for it (respectively).
These metrics help to estimate the quality of the CPU idle governor
in use.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add cpuidle.governor= command line parameter to allow the default
cpuidle governor to be replaced.
That is useful, for example, if someone running a tickful kernel
wants to use the menu governor on it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Important information is missing from user/admin cpuidle documentation
available today, so add a new user/admin document for cpuidle containing
current and comprehensive information to admin-guide and drop the old
.txt documents it is replacing.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
