Add four tests to executor_test.c to test behavior of filtering attributes.
- parse_filter_attr_test - to test the parsing of inputted filters
- filter_attr_test - to test the filtering procedure on attributes
- filter_attr_empty_test - to test the behavior when all tests are filtered
out
- filter_attr_skip_test - to test the configurable filter_action=skip
option
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add filtering of test attributes. Users can filter tests using the
module_param called "filter".
Filters are imputed in the format: <attribute_name><operation><value>
Example: kunit.filter="speed>slow"
Operations include: >, <, >=, <=, !=, and =. These operations will act the
same for attributes of the same type but may not between types.
Note multiple filters can be inputted by separating them with a comma.
Example: kunit.filter="speed=slow, module!=example"
Since both suites and test cases can have attributes, there may be
conflicts. The process of filtering follows these rules:
- Filtering always operates at a per-test level.
- If a test has an attribute set, then the test's value is filtered on.
- Otherwise, the value falls back to the suite's value.
- If neither are set, the attribute has a global "default" value, which
is used.
Filtered tests will not be run or show in output. The tests can instead be
skipped using the configurable option "kunit.filter_action=skip".
Note the default settings for running tests remains unfiltered.
Finally, add "filter" methods for the speed and module attributes to parse
and compare attribute values.
Note this filtering functionality will be added to kunit.py in the next
patch.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Now we have the kunit_add_action() function, we can use it to implement
kfree_at_end() and free_subsuite_at_end() without the need for extra
helper functions.
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as
a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s).
For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array.
This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the
executor.
Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single
giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly
manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test
filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything.
Tested-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
When filtering what tests to run (suites and/or cases) via
kunit.filter_glob (e.g. kunit.py run <glob>), we allocate copies of
suites.
These allocations can fail, and we largely don't handle that.
Note: realistically, this probably doesn't matter much.
We're not allocating much memory and this happens early in boot, so if
we can't do that, then there's likely far bigger problems.
This patch makes us immediately bail out from the top-level function
(kunit_filter_suites) with -ENOMEM if any of the underlying kmalloc()
calls return NULL.
Implementation note: we used to return NULL pointers from some functions
to indicate either that all suites/tests were filtered out or there was
an error allocating the new array.
We'll log a short error in this case and not run any tests or print a
TAP header. From a kunit.py user's perspective, they'll get a message
about missing/invalid TAP output and have to dig into the test.log to
see it. Since hitting this error seems so unlikely, it's probably fine
to not invent a way to plumb this error message more visibly.
See also: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220329103919.2376818-1-lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Reported-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
When a user filters by a suite and not a test, e.g.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'suite_name'
it hits this code
const int len = strlen(filter_glob);
...
parsed->suite_glob = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
which fails to allocate space for the terminating NULL.
Somehow, it seems like we can't easily reproduce this under UML, so the
existing `parse_filter_test()` didn't catch this.
Fix this by allocating `len + 1` and switch to kzalloc() just to be a
bit more defensive. We're only going to run this code once per kernel
boot, and it should never be very long.
Also update the unit tests to be a bit more cautious.
This bug showed up as a NULL pointer dereference here:
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered.start[0][0]->name, "suite0");
`filtered.start[0][0]` was NULL, and `name` is at offset 0 in the struct,
so `...->name` was also NULL.
Fixes: 3b29021ddd10 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit 1d71307a6f ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by
names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob.
This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases
inside of suites as well.
This is quite useful when, e.g.
* trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on
* trying to debug issues with test hermeticity
Examples:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*'
...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests'
...
[ERROR] no tests run!
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The reference counting issue happens in the normal path of
kfree_at_end(). When kunit_alloc_and_get_resource() is invoked, the
function forgets to handle the returned resource object, whose refcount
increased inside, causing a refcount leak.
Fix this issue by calling kunit_alloc_resource() instead of
kunit_alloc_and_get_resource().
Fixed the following when applying:
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
+ kunit_alloc_resource(test, NULL, kfree_res_free, GFP_KERNEL,
(void *)to_free);
Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This adds unit tests for kunit_filter_subsuite() and
kunit_filter_suites().
Note: what the executor means by "subsuite" is the array of suites
corresponding to each test file.
This patch lightly refactors executor.c to avoid the use of global
variables to make it testable.
It also includes a clever `kfree_at_end()` helper that makes this test
easier to write than it otherwise would have been.
Tested by running just the new tests using itself
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run '*exec*'
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
