The drivers/base/power/ directory is special and contains code related
to power management core like system suspend/resume, hibernation, etc.
It was fine to keep the OPP code inside it when we had just one file for
it, but it is growing now and already has a directory for itself.
Lets move it directly under drivers/ directory, just like cpufreq and
cpuidle.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The notifier callbacks may want to call some OPP helper routines which
may try to take the same opp_table->lock again and cause a deadlock. One
such usecase was reported by Chanwoo Choi, where calling
dev_pm_opp_disable() leads us to the devfreq's OPP notifier handler,
which further calls dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor() and it deadlocks.
We don't really need the opp_table->lock to be held across the notifier
call though, all we want to make sure is that the 'opp' doesn't get
freed while being used from within the notifier chain. We can do it with
help of dev_pm_opp_get/put() as well. Let's do it.
Cc: 4.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.11+
Fixes: 5b650b3888 "PM / OPP: Take kref from _find_opp_table()"
Reported-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In order to support OPP switching, OPP layer needs to get pointer to the
clock for the device. Simple cases work fine without using the routines
added by this patch (i.e. by passing connection-id as NULL), but for a
device with multiple clocks available, the OPP core needs to know the
exact name of the clk to use.
Add a new set of APIs to get that done.
Tested-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This code was required while the OPP core was managed with help of RCUs,
but not anymore. Get rid of unnecessary alloc/memcpy operations.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The code was overly complicated here because of the limitations that we
had with RCUs (Couldn't use opp-table and OPPs outside RCU protected
section and can't call sleep-able routines from within that). But that
is long gone now.
Reorganize _generic_set_opp_regulator() in order to avoid using "struct
dev_pm_set_opp_data" and copying data into it for the case where
opp_table->set_opp is not set.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reading array at given index before checking if index is valid results in
illegal memory access.
The bug was detected using KASAN framework.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Fixes the following sparse warning:
drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:49:18: warning:
symbol '_find_opp_table_unlocked' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency() calls _find_opp_table() two times
effectively.
Merge _get_regulator_count() into dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency() to
avoid that.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
As we don't use RCU locking anymore, there is no need to replace an
earlier OPP node with a new one. Just update the existing one.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The RCU locking isn't well suited for the OPP core. The RCU locking fits
better for reader heavy stuff, while the OPP core have at max one or two
readers only at a time.
Over that, it was getting very confusing the way RCU locking was used
with the OPP core. The individual OPPs are mostly well handled, i.e. for
an update a new structure was created and then that replaced the older
one. But the OPP tables were updated directly all the time from various
parts of the core. Though they were mostly used from within RCU locked
region, they didn't had much to do with RCU and were governed by the
mutex instead.
And that mixed with the 'opp_table_lock' has made the core even more
confusing.
Now that we are already managing the OPPs and the OPP tables with kernel
reference infrastructure, we can get rid of RCU locking completely and
simplify the code a lot.
Remove all RCU references from code and comments.
Acquire opp_table->lock while parsing the list of OPPs though.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Take reference of the OPP table from within _find_opp_table(). Also
update the callers of _find_opp_table() to call
dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table() after they have used the OPP table.
Note that _find_opp_table() increments the reference under the
opp_table_lock.
Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed until the callers of
_find_opp_table() call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(), there is no need to
take the opp_table_lock or rcu_read_lock() around it. Drop them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch updates dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to get a reference
to the OPPs returned by them.
Also updates the users of dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to call
dev_pm_opp_put() after they are done using the OPPs.
As it is guaranteed the that OPPs wouldn't get freed while being used,
the RCU read side locking present with the users isn't required anymore.
Drop it as well.
This patch also updates all users of devfreq_recommended_opp() which was
returning an OPP received from the OPP core.
Note that some of the OPP core routines have gained
rcu_read_{lock|unlock}() calls, as those still use RCU specific APIs
within them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> [Devfreq]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add kref to struct dev_pm_opp for easier accounting of the OPPs.
Note that the OPPs are freed under the opp_table->lock mutex only.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table()
to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used.
Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table.
Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are
executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need
to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well.
Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release
routines aren't used anymore, remove them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Take reference of the OPP table while adding and removing OPPs, that
helps us remove special checks in _remove_opp_table().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Now that we have proper kernel reference infrastructure in place for OPP
tables, use it to guarantee that the OPP table isn't freed while being
used by the callers of dev_pm_opp_set_*() APIs.
Make them all return the pointer to the OPP table after taking its
reference and put the reference back with dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs.
Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are
executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need
to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well.
Remove the rcu specific comments from these routines as they aren't
relevant anymore.
Note that prototypes of dev_pm_opp_{set|put}_regulators() were already
updated by another patch.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add kref to struct opp_table for easier accounting of the OPP table.
Note that the new routine dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() takes the reference
from under the opp_table_lock, which guarantees that the OPP table
doesn't get freed unless dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table() is called for the
OPP table.
Two separate release mechanisms are added: locked and unlocked. In
unlocked version the routines aren't required to take/drop
opp_table_lock as the callers have already done that. This is required
to avoid breaking git bisect, otherwise we may get lockdeps between
commits. Once all the users of OPP table are updated the unlocked
version shall be removed.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add per OPP table lock to protect opp_table->opp_list.
Note that at few places opp_list is used under the rcu_read_lock() and
so a mutex can't be added there for now. This will be fixed by a later
patch.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Split out parts of _add_opp_table() and _remove_opp_table() into
separate routines. This improves readability as well.
Should result in no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Let the OPP core provide helpers to register notifiers for any device,
instead of exposing srcu_head outside of the core.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There is only one user of dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() and that uses it
to get the OPP rate for the suspend_opp.
Rename dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() as dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq()
and return the rate directly from it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There is no point in trying to find/allocate the table for every OPP
that is added for a device. It would be far more efficient to allocate
the table only once and pass its pointer to the routines that add the
OPP entry.
Locking is removed from _opp_add_static_v2() and _opp_add_v1() now as
the callers call them with that lock already held.
Call to _remove_opp_table() routine is also removed from _opp_free()
now, as opp_table isn't allocated from within _opp_allocate(). This is
handled by the routines which created the OPP table in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Later patches would want to remove OPP table (and its OPPs) using the
opp_table pointer instead of 'dev'.
In order to prepare for that, rename _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() as
_dev_pm_opp_find_and_remove_table() split out part of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The OPPs which are never successfully added using _opp_add() are not
required to be freed with the _opp_remove() routine, as a simple kfree()
is enough for them.
Introduce a new light weight routine _opp_free(), which will do that.
That also helps us removing the 'notify' parameter to _opp_remove(),
which isn't required anymore.
Note that _opp_free() contains a call to _remove_opp_table() as the OPP
table might have been added for this very OPP only. The
_remove_opp_table() routine returns quickly if there are more OPPs in
the table. This will be simplified in later patches though.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Make the naming consistent with how other routines are named.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There are two types of duplicate OPPs that get different behavior from
the core:
A) An earlier OPP is marked 'available' and has same freq/voltages as
the new one.
B) An earlier OPP with same frequency, but is marked 'unavailable' OR
doesn't have same voltages as the new one.
The OPP core returns 0 for the first one, but -EEXIST for the second.
While the OPP core returns 0 for the first case, its callers don't free
the newly allocated OPP structure which isn't used anymore. Fix that by
returning -EBUSY instead of 0, but make the callers return 0 eventually.
As this isn't a critical fix, its not getting marked for stable kernel.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If a platform specific OPP driver has called this routine first and set
the regulators, then the second call from cpufreq-dt driver will hit the
WARN_ON(). Remove the WARN_ON(), but continue to return error in such
cases.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The generic set_opp() handler isn't sufficient for platforms with
complex DVFS. For example, some TI platforms have multiple regulators
for a CPU device. The order in which various supplies need to be
programmed is only known to the platform code and its best to leave it
to it.
This patch implements APIs to register platform specific set_opp()
callback.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Later patches would add support for custom set_opp() callbacks. This
patch separates out the code for _generic_set_opp() handler in order to
prepare for that.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch adds infrastructure to manage multiple regulators and updates
the only user (cpufreq-dt) of dev_pm_opp_set{put}_regulator().
This is preparatory work for adding full support for devices with
multiple regulators.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Pass the entire supply structure instead of all of its fields.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This is a preparatory step for multiple regulator per device support.
Move the voltage/current variables to a new structure.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The OPP structure must not be used out of the rcu protected section.
Cache the values to be used in separate variables instead.
Cc: 4.6+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.6+
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Joonyoung Shim reported an interesting problem on his ARM octa-core
Odoroid-XU3 platform. During system suspend, dev_pm_opp_put_regulator()
was failing for a struct device for which dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() is
called earlier.
This happened because an earlier call to
dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table() function (from cpufreq-dt.c file)
removed all the entries from opp_table->dev_list apart from the last CPU
device in the cpumask of CPUs sharing the OPP.
But both dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and dev_pm_opp_put_regulator()
routines get CPU device for the first CPU in the cpumask. And so the OPP
core failed to find the OPP table for the struct device.
This patch attempts to fix this problem by returning a pointer to the
opp_table from dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and using that as the
parameter to dev_pm_opp_put_regulator(). This ensures that the
dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() doesn't fail to find the opp table.
Note that similar design problem also exists with other
dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs, but those aren't used currently by anyone and
so we don't need to update them for now.
Cc: 4.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+
Reported-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ Viresh: Wrote commit log and tested on exynos 5250 ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is set and we are building with -Wmaybe-uninitialized
enabled, we can get a warning for the opp core driver:
drivers/base/power/opp/core.c: In function 'dev_pm_opp_set_rate':
drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:560:8: warning: 'ou_volt_min' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
This has only now appeared as a result of commit 797da5598f ("PM / devfreq:
Add COMPILE_TEST for build coverage"), which makes the driver visible in
some configurations that didn't have it before.
The warning is a false positive that I got with gcc-6.1.1, but there is
a simple workaround in removing the local variables that we get warnings
for (all three are affected depending on the configuration). This also
makes the code easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In dev_pm_opp_set_rate(), _find_opp_table() is called 4 times: once by
_get_opp_clk(), once by dev_pm_opp_set_rate() itself, and twice by
dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(). If there are several opp_tables in the
system, three times of opp table finding is a big waste. This patch
reduced the call of _find_opp_table() to twice.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Recently, a few issues were noticed in the code where CONFIG_OF wasn't
consistently used for many routines. The core file is big enough now and
ifdef hackery makes it less readable.
Move OF-specific code to another file and compile that only if CONFIG_OF
is enabled.
Compile-tested:
- For ARM (exynos) with CONFIG_OF enabled
- For X86 with CONFIG_OF disabled (have to enable CONFIG_PM_OPP separately)
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Regulators are optional for devices using OPPs and the OPP core
shouldn't be printing any errors for such missing regulators.
It was fine before the commit 0c717d0f9c, but that failed to update
this part of the code to remove an 'always true' check and an extra
unwanted print message.
Fix that now.
Fixes: 0c717d0f9c (PM / OPP: Initialize regulator pointer to an error value)
Reported-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Functions dev_pm_opp_of_{cpumask_,}remove_table removes/frees all the
static OPP entries associated with the device and/or all cpus(in case
of cpumask) that are created from DT.
However the OPP entries are populated reading from the firmware or some
different method using dev_pm_opp_add are marked dynamic and can't be
removed using above functions.
This patch adds non DT/OF versions of dev_pm_opp_{cpumask_,}remove_table
to support the above mentioned usecase.
This is in preparation to make use of the same in scpi-cpufreq.c
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Stephen pointed out recently, that few structures always confuse him as
they aren't named properly. And this patch tries to address that:
Names are updated as:
- device_opp or dev_opp -> opp_table
- dev_opp_list -> opp_tables
- dev_opp_list_lock -> opp_table_lock
- device_list_opp -> opp_device (it was never a list, but a structure)
- list_dev -> opp_dev
- And similar changes in comments and function names as well.
This also fixes checkpatch warnings that were generated with this patch.
No functional changes.
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Some comments were just copy/pasted from other sections and don't match
to the routines they were added for. Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We are currently required to do two checks for regulator pointer:
IS_ERR() and IS_NULL().
And multiple instances are reported, about both of these not being used
consistently and so resulting in crashes.
Fix that by initializing regulator pointer with an error value and
checking it only against an error.
This makes code more consistent and more efficient.
Fixes: 7d34d56ef3 (PM / OPP: Disable OPPs that aren't supported by the regulator)
Reported-and-tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Initialize to -ENXIO ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We kept u_volt_min/max initialized to 0, when only the target voltage is
present in DT, instead of the target/min/max triplet.
This didn't go well with the regulator framework, as on few calls the
min voltage was set to target and max was set to 0 and so resulted in a
kernel crash like below:
kernel BUG at ../drivers/regulator/core.c:216!
[<c0684af4>] (regulator_check_voltage) from [<c06857ac>] (regulator_set_voltage_unlocked+0x58/0x230)
[<c06857ac>] (regulator_set_voltage_unlocked) from [<c06859ac>] (regulator_set_voltage+0x28/0x54)
[<c06859ac>] (regulator_set_voltage) from [<c0775b28>] (_set_opp_voltage+0x30/0x98)
[<c0775b28>] (_set_opp_voltage) from [<c0776630>] (dev_pm_opp_set_rate+0xf0/0x28c)
[<c0776630>] (dev_pm_opp_set_rate) from [<c096f784>] (__cpufreq_driver_target+0x184/0x2b4)
[<c096f784>] (__cpufreq_driver_target) from [<c0973760>] (dbs_check_cpu+0x1b0/0x1f4)
[<c0973760>] (dbs_check_cpu) from [<c0973f30>] (cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x324/0x5c4)
[<c0973f30>] (cpufreq_governor_dbs) from [<c0970958>] (__cpufreq_governor+0xe4/0x1ec)
[<c0970958>] (__cpufreq_governor) from [<c09711e0>] (cpufreq_init_policy+0x64/0x8c)
[<c09711e0>] (cpufreq_init_policy) from [<c09718cc>] (cpufreq_online+0x2fc/0x708)
[<c09718cc>] (cpufreq_online) from [<c0765ff0>] (subsys_interface_register+0x94/0xd8)
[<c0765ff0>] (subsys_interface_register) from [<c0970530>] (cpufreq_register_driver+0x14c/0x19c)
[<c0970530>] (cpufreq_register_driver) from [<c09746dc>] (dt_cpufreq_probe+0x70/0xec)
[<c09746dc>] (dt_cpufreq_probe) from [<c076907c>] (platform_drv_probe+0x4c/0xb0)
[<c076907c>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c07678e0>] (driver_probe_device+0x214/0x2c0)
[<c07678e0>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0767a18>] (__driver_attach+0x8c/0x90)
[<c0767a18>] (__driver_attach) from [<c0765c2c>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0x9c)
[<c0765c2c>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c0766d78>] (bus_add_driver+0x1a0/0x218)
[<c0766d78>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c076810c>] (driver_register+0x78/0xf8)
[<c076810c>] (driver_register) from [<c0301d74>] (do_one_initcall+0x90/0x1d8)
[<c0301d74>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c1100e14>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x15c/0x1fc)
[<c1100e14>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c0b27a0c>] (kernel_init+0x8/0xf0)
[<c0b27a0c>] (kernel_init) from [<c0307d78>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c)
Code: e1550004 baffffeb e3a00000 e8bd8070 (e7f001f2)
Fix that by initializing u_volt_min/max to the target voltage in such cases.
Reported-and-tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Fixes: 274659029c (PM / OPP: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings)
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 7d34d56ef3 (PM / OPP: Disable OPPs that aren't supported by
the regulator) causes a crash to happen on Tegra124 Jetson TK1 when
using the DFLL clock source for the CPU. The DFLL manages the voltage
itself and so there is no regulator specified for the OPPs and so we
get a crash when we try to dereference the regulator pointer. Fix
this by checking to see if the regulator IS_ERR_OR_NULL before
dereferencing it.
Fixes: 7d34d56ef3 (PM / OPP: Disable OPPs that aren't supported by the regulator)
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This adds a routine, dev_pm_opp_set_rate(), responsible for configuring
power-supply and clock source for an OPP.
The OPP is found by matching against the target_freq passed to the
routine. This shall replace similar code present in most of the OPP
users and help simplify them a lot.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
OPP core has got almost everything now to manage device's OPP
transitions, the only thing left is device's clk. Get that as well.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
V2 bindings have better support for clock-latency and voltage-tolerance
and doesn't need special care. To use callbacks, like
dev_pm_opp_get_max_{transition|volt}_latency(), irrespective of the
bindings, the core needs to know clock-latency/voltage-tolerance for the
earlier bindings.
This patch reads clock-latency/voltage-tolerance from the device node,
irrespective of the bindings (to keep it simple) and use them only for
V1 bindings.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In few use cases (like: cpufreq), it is desired to get the maximum
latency for changing OPPs. Add support for that.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In few use cases (like: cpufreq), it is desired to get the maximum
voltage latency for changing OPPs. Add support for that.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
