Commit graph

17 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nicholas Piggin
59dc5bfca0 powerpc/64s: avoid reloading (H)SRR registers if they are still valid
When an interrupt is taken, the SRR registers are set to return to where
it left off. Unless they are modified in the meantime, or the return
address or MSR are modified, there is no need to reload these registers
when returning from interrupt.

Introduce per-CPU flags that track the validity of SRR and HSRR
registers. These are cleared when returning from interrupt, when
using the registers for something else (e.g., OPAL calls), when
adjusting the return address or MSR of a context, and when context
switching (which changes the return address and MSR).

This improves the performance of interrupt returns.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
[mpe: Fold in fixup patch from Nick]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210617155116.2167984-5-npiggin@gmail.com
2021-06-25 00:06:55 +10:00
Christophe Leroy
69d4d6e5fd powerpc: Don't use 'struct ppc_inst' to reference instruction location
'struct ppc_inst' is an internal representation of an instruction, but
in-memory instructions are and will remain a table of 'u32' forever.

Replace all 'struct ppc_inst *' used for locating an instruction in
memory by 'u32 *'. This removes a lot of undue casts to 'struct
ppc_inst *'.

It also helps locating ab-use of 'struct ppc_inst' dereference.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
[mpe: Fix ppc_inst_next(), use u32 instead of unsigned int]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7062722b087228e42cbd896e39bfdf526d6a340a.1621516826.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-06-17 00:09:00 +10:00
Christophe Leroy
18c85964b1 powerpc: Do not dereference code as 'struct ppc_inst' (uprobe, code-patching, feature-fixups)
'struct ppc_inst' is an internal structure to represent an instruction,
it is not directly the representation of that instruction in text code.
It is not meant to map and dereference code.

Dereferencing code directly through 'struct ppc_inst' has two main issues:
- On powerpc, structs are expected to be 8 bytes aligned while code is
spread every 4 byte.
- Should a non prefixed instruction lie at the end of the page and the
following page not be mapped, it would generate a page fault.

In-memory code must be accessed with ppc_inst_read().

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c9a1201dd0a66b4a0f91f0fb46d9385cbf030feb.1621516826.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-06-16 23:35:57 +10:00
Ravi Bangoria
d943bc742a powerpc/uprobes: Validation for prefixed instruction
As per ISA 3.1, prefixed instruction should not cross 64-byte
boundary. So don't allow Uprobe on such prefixed instruction.

There are two ways probed instruction is changed in mapped pages.
First, when Uprobe is activated, it searches for all the relevant
pages and replace instruction in them. In this case, if that probe
is on the 64-byte unaligned prefixed instruction, error out
directly. Second, when Uprobe is already active and user maps a
relevant page via mmap(), instruction is replaced via mmap() code
path. But because Uprobe is invalid, entire mmap() operation can
not be stopped. In this case just print an error and continue.

Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210311091538.368590-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com
2021-03-29 12:52:24 +11:00
Nick Desaulniers
49a4136505 powerpc: fix -Wimplicit-fallthrough
The "fallthrough" pseudo-keyword was added as a portable way to denote
intentional fallthrough. Clang will still warn on cases where there is a
fallthrough to an immediate break. Add explicit breaks for those cases.

Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/236
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-11-18 14:18:09 -06:00
Michael Ellerman
c5ff46d69c powerpc: Add ppc_inst_next()
In a few places we want to calculate the address of the next
instruction. Previously that was simple, we just added 4 bytes, or if
using a u32 * we incremented that pointer by 1.

But prefixed instructions make it more complicated, we need to advance
by either 4 or 8 bytes depending on the actual instruction. We also
can't do pointer arithmetic using struct ppc_inst, because it is
always 8 bytes in size on 64-bit, even though we might only need to
advance by 4 bytes.

So add a ppc_inst_next() helper which calculates the location of the
next instruction, if the given instruction was located at the given
address. Note the instruction doesn't need to actually be at the
address in memory.

Although it would seem natural for the value to be passed by value,
that makes it too easy to write a loop that will read off the end of a
page, eg:

	for (; src < end; src = ppc_inst_next(src, *src),
			  dest = ppc_inst_next(dest, *dest))

As noticed by Christophe and Jordan, if end is the exact end of a
page, and the next page is not mapped, this will fault, because *dest
will read 8 bytes, 4 bytes into the next page.

So value is passed by reference, so the helper can be careful to use
ppc_inst_read() on it.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200522133318.1681406-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
2020-05-26 23:36:51 +10:00
Jordan Niethe
622cf6f436 powerpc: Introduce a function for reporting instruction length
Currently all instructions have the same length, but in preparation for
prefixed instructions introduce a function for returning instruction
length.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-18-jniethe5@gmail.com
2020-05-19 00:10:38 +10:00
Jordan Niethe
f8faaffaa7 powerpc: Use a function for reading instructions
Prefixed instructions will mean there are instructions of different
length. As a result dereferencing a pointer to an instruction will not
necessarily give the desired result. Introduce a function for reading
instructions from memory into the instruction data type.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-13-jniethe5@gmail.com
2020-05-19 00:10:37 +10:00
Jordan Niethe
7534625128 powerpc: Use a macro for creating instructions from u32s
In preparation for instructions having a more complex data type start
using a macro, ppc_inst(), for making an instruction out of a u32.  A
macro is used so that instructions can be used as initializer elements.
Currently this does nothing, but it will allow for creating a data type
that can represent prefixed instructions.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
[mpe: Change include guard to _ASM_POWERPC_INST_H]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506034050.24806-7-jniethe5@gmail.com
2020-05-19 00:10:36 +10:00
Thomas Gleixner
1a59d1b8e0 treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 156
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
  the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
  your option any later version this program is distributed in the
  hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even
  the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
  purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you
  should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along
  with this program if not write to the free software foundation inc
  59 temple place suite 330 boston ma 02111 1307 usa

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-or-later

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1334 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070033.113240726@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-30 11:26:35 -07:00
Naveen N. Rao
2dea1d9c38 powerpc/uprobes: Implement arch_uretprobe_is_alive()
This helper is used to detect if a uprobe'd function has returned
through a setjmp/longjmp, rather than branching to the LR that was
updated previously by us. This fixes a SIGSEGV that gets generated when
programs use setjmp/longjmp with uretprobes.

We use the arm64 model (arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:
arch_uretprobe_is_alive()) for detecting when stack frames have been
removed from under us.

Reference:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=143748610330073
commit 7b868e4802 ("uprobes/x86: Reimplement arch_uretprobe_is_alive()")
commit db087ef69a ("uprobes/x86: Make arch_uretprobe_is_alive(RP_CHECK_CALL) more
clever")

Tested with the test program from:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=systemtap.git;a=blob;f=testsuite/systemtap.base/bz5274.c;hb=HEAD

And this script:
    $ cat test.sh
    #!/bin/bash

    perf probe -x ./bz5274 -a bz5274_main_return=main%return
    perf probe -x ./bz5274 -a bz5274_funca_return=funca%return
    perf probe -x ./bz5274 -a bz5274_funcb_return=funcb%return
    perf probe -x ./bz5274 -a bz5274_funcc_return=funcc%return
    perf probe -x ./bz5274 -a bz5274_funcd_return=funcd%return

    perf record -e 'probe_bz5274:*' -aR ./bz5274

Reported-by: Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gduarte@redhat.com>
Reported-by: zsun@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-08-24 16:19:21 +10:00
Oleg Nesterov
3d78e945b6 uprobes/powerpc: Kill arch_uprobe->ainsn
powerpc has both arch_uprobe->insn and arch_uprobe->ainsn to
make the generic code happy. This is no longer needed after
the previous change, powerpc can just use "u32 insn".

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
2013-11-20 16:31:01 +01:00
Anton Arapov
f15706b79d uretprobes/powerpc: Hijack return address
Hijack the return address and replace it with a trampoline address.
PowerPC implementation.

Signed-off-by: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-04-13 15:31:56 +02:00
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
3c9eb54f71 uprobes/powerpc: Remove additional trap instruction check
prepare_uprobe() already checks if the underlying unstruction
(on file) is a trap variant. We don't need to check this again.

Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-04-04 13:57:04 +02:00
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
ab07e807be uprobes/powerpc: Teach uprobes to ignore gdb breakpoints
Powerpc has many trap variants that could be used by entities like gdb.
Currently, running gdb on a program being traced by uprobes causes an
endless loop since uprobes doesn't understand that the trap was inserted
by some other entity and a SIGTRAP needs to be delivered.

Teach uprobes to ignore breakpoints that do not belong to it.

Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
2013-04-04 13:57:04 +02:00
Oleg Nesterov
65b2c8f0e5 uprobes/powerpc: Do not use arch_uprobe_*_step() helpers
No functional changes.

powerpc is the only user of arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step() helpers,
but they should die. They can not be used correctly, every arch needs
its own implementation (like x86 does). And they do not really help
even as initial-and-almost-working code, arch_uprobe_*_xol() hooks can
easily use user_enable/disable_single_step() directly.

Change arch_uprobe_*_step() to do nothing, and convert powerpc to use
ptrace helpers. This is equally wrong, powerpc needs the arch-specific
fixes.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-11-03 17:15:12 +01:00
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
8b7b80b9eb powerpc: Uprobes port to powerpc
This is the port of uprobes to powerpc. Usage is similar to x86.

[root@xxxx ~]# ./bin/perf probe -x /lib64/libc.so.6 malloc
Added new event:
  probe_libc:malloc    (on 0xb4860)

You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:

	perf record -e probe_libc:malloc -aR sleep 1

[root@xxxx ~]# ./bin/perf record -e probe_libc:malloc -aR sleep 20
[ perf record: Woken up 22 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 5.843 MB perf.data (~255302 samples) ]
[root@xxxx ~]# ./bin/perf report --stdio
...

    69.05%           tar  libc-2.12.so   [.] malloc
    28.57%            rm  libc-2.12.so   [.] malloc
     1.32%  avahi-daemon  libc-2.12.so   [.] malloc
     0.58%          bash  libc-2.12.so   [.] malloc
     0.28%          sshd  libc-2.12.so   [.] malloc
     0.08%    irqbalance  libc-2.12.so   [.] malloc
     0.05%         bzip2  libc-2.12.so   [.] malloc
     0.04%         sleep  libc-2.12.so   [.] malloc
     0.03%    multipathd  libc-2.12.so   [.] malloc
     0.01%      sendmail  libc-2.12.so   [.] malloc
     0.01%     automount  libc-2.12.so   [.] malloc

The trap_nr addition patch is a prereq.

Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
2012-09-05 15:35:19 +10:00