In CXL 2.0, 8.2.5.1 CXL Capability Header Register: this register
is given as 32 bits.
8.2.3 which covers the CXL 2.0 Component registers, including the
CXL Capability Header Register states that access restrictions
specified in Section 8.2.2 apply.
8.2.2 includes:
* A 32 bit register shall be accessed as a 4 Byte quantity.
...
If these rules are not followed, the behavior is undefined.
Discovered during review of CXL QEMU emulation. Alex Bennée pointed
out there was a comment saying that 4 byte registers must be read
with a 4 byte read, but 8 byte reads were being emulated.
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87bkzyd3c7.fsf@linaro.org/
Fixing that, led to this code failing. Whilst a given hardware
implementation 'might' work with an 8 byte read, it should not be relied
upon. The QEMU emulation v5 will return 0 and log the wrong access width.
The code moved, so one fixes tag for where this will directly apply and
also a reference to the earlier introduction of the code for backports.
Fixes: 0f06157e01 ("cxl/core: Move register mapping infrastructure")
Fixes: 08422378c4 ("cxl/pci: Add HDM decoder capabilities")
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220201153437.2873-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Unlike the decoder enumeration for "root decoders" described by platform
firmware, standard decoders can be enumerated from the component
registers space once the base address has been identified (via PCI,
ACPI, or another mechanism).
Add common infrastructure for HDM (Host-managed-Device-Memory) Decoder
enumeration and share it between host-bridge, upstream switch port, and
cxl_test defined decoders.
The locking model for switch level decoders is to hold the port lock
over the enumeration. This facilitates moving the dport and decoder
enumeration to a 'port' driver. For now, the only enumerator of decoder
resources is the cxl_acpi root driver.
Co-developed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164374688404.395335.9239248252443123526.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Similar to the mem.h rename, if the core wants to reuse definitions from
drivers/cxl/pci.h it is unable to use <pci.h> as that collides with
archs that have an arch/$arch/include/asm/pci.h, like MIPS.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164298422510.3018233.14693126572756675563.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
This implements the TODO in cxl_acpi for mapping component registers.
cxl_acpi becomes the second consumer of CXL register block enumeration
(cxl_pci being the first). Moving the functionality to cxl_core allows
both of these drivers to use the functionality. Equally importantly it
allows cxl_core to use the functionality in the future.
CXL 2.0 root ports are similar to CXL 2.0 Downstream Ports with the main
distinction being they're a part of the CXL 2.0 host bridge. While
mapping their component registers is not immediately useful for the CXL
drivers, the movement of register block enumeration into core is a vital
step towards HDM decoder programming.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
[djbw: fix cxl_regmap_to_base() failure cases]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164298415080.3018233.14694957480228676592.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
It turns out that the usb example of specifying the subsystem namespace
at build time is not preferred. The rationale for that preference has
become more apparent as CXL patches with plain EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL beg the
question, "why would any code other than CXL care about this symbol?".
Make the namespace explicit.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163676356810.3618264.601632777702192938.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The register mapping infrastructure is large enough to move to its own
compilation unit. This also cleans up an unnecessary include of <mem.h>
core/bus.c.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162800068975.665205.12895551621746585289.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
