The verifier errors around stack accesses have changed slightly in the
previous commit (generally for the better).
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210207011027.676572-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Instead of using shared global variables between userspace and BPF, use
the ring buffer to send the IMA hash on the BPF ring buffer. This helps
in validating both IMA and the usage of the ringbuffer in sleepable
programs.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210204193622.3367275-3-kpsingh@kernel.org
Add a short note to make contributors aware of the existence of the
script. The documentation does not intentionally document all the
options of the script to avoid mentioning it in two places (it's
available in the usage / help message of the script).
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210204194544.3383814-3-kpsingh@kernel.org
The script runs the BPF selftests locally on the same kernel image
as they would run post submit in the BPF continuous integration
framework.
The goal of the script is to allow contributors to run selftests locally
in the same environment to check if their changes would end up breaking
the BPF CI and reduce the back-and-forth between the maintainers and the
developers.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210204194544.3383814-2-kpsingh@kernel.org
This patch adds support to verifier tests to check for a succession of
verifier log messages on program load failure. This makes the errstr
field work uniformly across REJECT and VERBOSE_ACCEPT checks.
This patch also increases the maximum size of a message in the series of
messages to test from 80 chars to 200 chars. This is in order to keep
existing tests working, which sometimes test for messages larger than 80
chars (which was accepted in the REJECT case, when testing for a single
message, but not in the VERBOSE_ACCEPT case, when testing for possibly
multiple messages).
And example of such a long, checked message is in bounds.c: "R1 has
unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds, pointer arithmetic with it
prohibited for !root"
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210130220150.59305-1-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Some compilers trigger a warning when tmp_dir_path is allocated
with a fixed size of 64-bytes and used in the following snprintf:
snprintf(tmp_exec_path, sizeof(tmp_exec_path), "%s/copy_of_rm",
tmp_dir_path);
warning: ‘/copy_of_rm’ directive output may be truncated writing 11
bytes into a region of size between 1 and 64 [-Wformat-truncation=]
This is because it assumes that tmp_dir_path can be a maximum of 64
bytes long and, therefore, the end-result can get truncated. Fix it by
not using a fixed size in the initialization of tmp_dir_path which
allows the compiler to track actual size of the array better.
Fixes: 2f94ac1918 ("bpf: Update local storage test to check handling of null ptrs")
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210202213730.1906931-1-kpsingh@kernel.org
When BPF_FETCH is set, atomic instructions load a value from memory
into a register. The current verifier code first checks via
check_mem_access whether we can access the memory, and then checks
via check_reg_arg whether we can write into the register.
For loads, check_reg_arg has the side-effect of marking the
register's value as unkonwn, and check_mem_access has the side effect
of propagating bounds from memory to the register. This currently only
takes effect for stack memory.
Therefore with the current order, bounds information is thrown away,
but by simply reversing the order of check_reg_arg
vs. check_mem_access, we can instead propagate bounds smartly.
A simple test is added with an infinite loop that can only be proved
unreachable if this propagation is present. This is implemented both
with C and directly in test_verifier using assembly.
Suggested-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210202135002.4024825-1-jackmanb@google.com
Those hooks run as BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK and operate on a locked socket.
Note that we could remove the switch for prog->expected_attach_type altogether
since all current sock_addr attach types are covered. However, it makes sense
to keep it as a safe-guard in case new sock_addr attach types are added that
might not operate on a locked socket. Therefore, avoid to let this slip through.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-5-sdf@google.com
Can be used to query/modify socket state for unconnected UDP sendmsg.
Those hooks run as BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK and operate on
a locked socket.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-2-sdf@google.com
When dealing with BPF/BTF/pahole and DWARF v5 I wanted to build bpftool.
While looking into the source code I found duplicate assignments in misc tools
for the LLVM eco system, e.g. clang and llvm-objcopy.
Move the Clang, LLC and/or LLVM utils definitions to tools/scripts/Makefile.include
file and add missing includes where needed. Honestly, I was inspired by the commit
c8a950d0d3 ("tools: Factor HOSTCC, HOSTLD, HOSTAR definitions").
I tested with bpftool and perf on Debian/testing AMD64 and LLVM/Clang v11.1.0-rc1.
Build instructions:
[ make and make-options ]
MAKE="make V=1"
MAKE_OPTS="HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTLD=ld.lld CC=clang LD=ld.lld LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1"
MAKE_OPTS="$MAKE_OPTS PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole"
[ clean-up ]
$MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/ clean
[ bpftool ]
$MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/bpf/bpftool/
[ perf ]
PYTHON=python3 $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/perf/
I was careful with respecting the user's wish to override custom compiler, linker,
GNU/binutils and/or LLVM utils settings.
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> # tools/build and tools/perf
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210128015117.20515-1-sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Return 3 to indicate that permission check for port 111
should be skipped.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127193140.3170382-2-sdf@google.com
Fix bug in handling bpf_testmod unloading that will cause test_progs exiting
prematurely if bpf_testmod unloading failed. This is especially problematic
when running a subset of test_progs that doesn't require root permissions and
doesn't rely on bpf_testmod, yet will fail immediately due to exit(1) in
unload_bpf_testmod().
Fixes: 9f7fa22589 ("selftests/bpf: Add bpf_testmod kernel module for testing")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210126065019.1268027-1-andrii@kernel.org
Let us use a local variable in nsswitchthread(), so we can remove a
lot of casting for better readability.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122154725.22140-7-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
Instead of passing void * all over the place, let us pass the actual
type (ifobject) and remove the void-ptr-to-type-ptr casting.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122154725.22140-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
Add custom implementation of getsockopt hook for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE.
We skip generic hooks for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE and have a custom
call in do_tcp_getsockopt using the on-stack data. This removes
3% overhead for locking/unlocking the socket.
Without this patch:
3.38% 0.07% tcp_mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt
|
--3.30%--__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt
|
--0.81%--__kmalloc
With the patch applied:
0.52% 0.12% tcp_mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt_kern
Note, exporting uapi/tcp.h requires removing netinet/tcp.h
from test_progs.h because those headers have confliciting
definitions.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210115163501.805133-2-sdf@google.com
llvm patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D84002 permitted
to emit empty rodata datasec if the elf .rodata section
contains read-only data from local variables. These
local variables will be not emitted as BTF_KIND_VARs
since llvm converted these local variables as
static variables with private linkage without debuginfo
types. Such an empty rodata datasec will make
skeleton code generation easy since for skeleton
a rodata struct will be generated if there is a
.rodata elf section. The existence of a rodata
btf datasec is also consistent with the existence
of a rodata map created by libbpf.
The btf with such an empty rodata datasec will fail
in the kernel though as kernel will reject a datasec
with zero vlen and zero size. For example, for the below code,
int sys_enter(void *ctx)
{
int fmt[6] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6};
int dst[6];
bpf_probe_read(dst, sizeof(dst), fmt);
return 0;
}
We got the below btf (bpftool btf dump ./test.o):
[1] PTR '(anon)' type_id=0
[2] FUNC_PROTO '(anon)' ret_type_id=3 vlen=1
'ctx' type_id=1
[3] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
[4] FUNC 'sys_enter' type_id=2 linkage=global
[5] INT 'char' size=1 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=8 encoding=SIGNED
[6] ARRAY '(anon)' type_id=5 index_type_id=7 nr_elems=4
[7] INT '__ARRAY_SIZE_TYPE__' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=(none)
[8] VAR '_license' type_id=6, linkage=global-alloc
[9] DATASEC '.rodata' size=0 vlen=0
[10] DATASEC 'license' size=0 vlen=1
type_id=8 offset=0 size=4
When loading the ./test.o to the kernel with bpftool,
we see the following error:
libbpf: Error loading BTF: Invalid argument(22)
libbpf: magic: 0xeb9f
...
[6] ARRAY (anon) type_id=5 index_type_id=7 nr_elems=4
[7] INT __ARRAY_SIZE_TYPE__ size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=(none)
[8] VAR _license type_id=6 linkage=1
[9] DATASEC .rodata size=24 vlen=0 vlen == 0
libbpf: Error loading .BTF into kernel: -22. BTF is optional, ignoring.
Basically, libbpf changed .rodata datasec size to 24 since elf .rodata
section size is 24. The kernel then rejected the BTF since vlen = 0.
Note that the above kernel verifier failure can be worked around with
changing local variable "fmt" to a static or global, optionally const, variable.
This patch permits a datasec with vlen = 0 in kernel.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210119153519.3901963-1-yhs@fb.com
Reuse module_attach infrastructure to add a new bare tracepoint to check
we can attach to it as a raw tracepoint.
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210119122237.2426878-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
There are 3 tests added into verifier's jit tests to trigger x64
jit jump padding.
The first test can be represented as the following assembly code:
1: bpf_call bpf_get_prandom_u32
2: if r0 == 1 goto pc+128
3: if r0 == 2 goto pc+128
...
129: if r0 == 128 goto pc+128
130: goto pc+128
131: goto pc+127
...
256: goto pc+2
257: goto pc+1
258: r0 = 1
259: ret
We first store a random number to r0 and add the corresponding
conditional jumps (2~129) to make verifier believe that those jump
instructions from 130 to 257 are reachable. When the program is sent to
x64 jit, it starts to optimize out the NOP jumps backwards from 257.
Since there are 128 such jumps, the program easily reaches 15 passes and
triggers jump padding.
Here is the x64 jit code of the first test:
0: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
5: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
7: 55 push rbp
8: 48 89 e5 mov rbp,rsp
b: e8 4c 90 75 e3 call 0xffffffffe375905c
10: 48 83 f8 01 cmp rax,0x1
14: 0f 84 fe 04 00 00 je 0x518
1a: 48 83 f8 02 cmp rax,0x2
1e: 0f 84 f9 04 00 00 je 0x51d
...
f6: 48 83 f8 18 cmp rax,0x18
fa: 0f 84 8b 04 00 00 je 0x58b
100: 48 83 f8 19 cmp rax,0x19
104: 0f 84 86 04 00 00 je 0x590
10a: 48 83 f8 1a cmp rax,0x1a
10e: 0f 84 81 04 00 00 je 0x595
...
500: 0f 84 83 01 00 00 je 0x689
506: 48 81 f8 80 00 00 00 cmp rax,0x80
50d: 0f 84 76 01 00 00 je 0x689
513: e9 71 01 00 00 jmp 0x689
518: e9 6c 01 00 00 jmp 0x689
...
5fe: e9 86 00 00 00 jmp 0x689
603: e9 81 00 00 00 jmp 0x689
608: 0f 1f 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax]
60b: eb 7c jmp 0x689
60d: eb 7a jmp 0x689
...
683: eb 04 jmp 0x689
685: eb 02 jmp 0x689
687: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
689: b8 01 00 00 00 mov eax,0x1
68e: c9 leave
68f: c3 ret
As expected, a 3 bytes NOPs is inserted at 608 due to the transition
from imm32 jmp to imm8 jmp. A 2 bytes NOPs is also inserted at 687 to
replace a NOP jump.
The second test case is tricky. Here is the assembly code:
1: bpf_call bpf_get_prandom_u32
2: if r0 == 1 goto pc+2048
3: if r0 == 2 goto pc+2048
...
2049: if r0 == 2048 goto pc+2048
2050: goto pc+2048
2051: goto pc+16
2052: goto pc+15
...
2064: goto pc+3
2065: goto pc+2
2066: goto pc+1
...
[repeat "goto pc+16".."goto pc+1" 127 times]
...
4099: r0 = 2
4100: ret
There are 4 major parts of the program.
1) 1~2049: Those are instructions to make 2050~4098 reachable. Some of
them also could generate the padding for jmp_cond.
2) 2050: This is the target instruction for the imm32 nop jmp padding.
3) 2051~4098: The repeated "goto 1~16" instructions are designed to be
consumed by the nop jmp optimization. In the end, those
instrucitons become 128 continuous 0 offset jmp and are
optimized out in 1 pass, and this make insn 2050 an imm32
nop jmp in the next pass, so that we can trigger the
5 bytes padding.
4) 4099~4100: Those are the instructions to end the program.
The x64 jit code is like this:
0: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
5: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
7: 55 push rbp
8: 48 89 e5 mov rbp,rsp
b: e8 bc 7b d5 d3 call 0xffffffffd3d57bcc
10: 48 83 f8 01 cmp rax,0x1
14: 0f 84 7e 66 00 00 je 0x6698
1a: 48 83 f8 02 cmp rax,0x2
1e: 0f 84 74 66 00 00 je 0x6698
24: 48 83 f8 03 cmp rax,0x3
28: 0f 84 6a 66 00 00 je 0x6698
2e: 48 83 f8 04 cmp rax,0x4
32: 0f 84 60 66 00 00 je 0x6698
38: 48 83 f8 05 cmp rax,0x5
3c: 0f 84 56 66 00 00 je 0x6698
42: 48 83 f8 06 cmp rax,0x6
46: 0f 84 4c 66 00 00 je 0x6698
...
666c: 48 81 f8 fe 07 00 00 cmp rax,0x7fe
6673: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6677: 74 1f je 0x6698
6679: 48 81 f8 ff 07 00 00 cmp rax,0x7ff
6680: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6684: 74 12 je 0x6698
6686: 48 81 f8 00 08 00 00 cmp rax,0x800
668d: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6691: 74 05 je 0x6698
6693: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
6698: b8 02 00 00 00 mov eax,0x2
669d: c9 leave
669e: c3 ret
Since insn 2051~4098 are optimized out right before the padding pass,
there are several conditional jumps from the first part are replaced with
imm8 jmp_cond, and this triggers the 4 bytes padding, for example at
6673, 6680, and 668d. On the other hand, Insn 2050 is replaced with the
5 bytes nops at 6693.
The third test is to invoke the first and second tests as subprogs to test
bpf2bpf. Per the system log, there was one more jit happened with only
one pass and the same jit code was produced.
v4:
- Add the second test case which triggers jmp_cond padding and imm32 nop
jmp padding.
- Add the new test case as another subprog
Signed-off-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210119102501.511-4-glin@suse.com
Currently tests for bpf_get_ns_current_pid_tgid() are outside test_progs.
This change folds test cases into test_progs.
Changes from v11:
- Fixed test failure is not detected.
- Removed EXIT(3) call as it will stop test_progs execution.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Neira <cneirabustos@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114141033.GA17348@localhost
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Conflicts:
drivers/net/can/dev.c
commit 03f16c5075 ("can: dev: can_restart: fix use after free bug")
commit 3e77f70e73 ("can: dev: move driver related infrastructure into separate subdir")
Code move.
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
commit 8e4052c32d ("net: dsa: b53: fix an off by one in checking "vlan->vid"")
commit b7a9e0da2d ("net: switchdev: remove vid_begin -> vid_end range from VLAN objects")
Field rename.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The prog_test that's added depends on Clang/LLVM features added by
Yonghong in commit 286daafd6512 (was https://reviews.llvm.org/D72184).
Note the use of a define called ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS: this is used
to:
- Avoid breaking the build for people on old versions of Clang
- Avoid needing separate lists of test objects for no_alu32, where
atomics are not supported even if Clang has the feature.
The atomics_test.o BPF object is built unconditionally both for
test_progs and test_progs-no_alu32. For test_progs, if Clang supports
atomics, ENABLE_ATOMICS_TESTS is defined, so it includes the proper
test code. Otherwise, progs and global vars are defined anyway, as
stubs; this means that the skeleton user code still builds.
The atomics_test.o userspace object is built once and used for both
test_progs and test_progs-no_alu32. A variable called skip_tests is
defined in the BPF object's data section, which tells the userspace
object whether to skip the atomics test.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-11-jackmanb@google.com
A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new
operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with
the immediate discriminating different operations.
In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start
calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD.
This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the
immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero.
All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is
kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel
headers.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
Add a test to check that the verifier is able to recognize spilling of
PTR_TO_MEM registers, by reserving a ringbuf buffer, forcing the spill
of a pointer holding the buffer address to the stack, filling it back
in from the stack and writing to the memory area pointed by it.
The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.
Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210113053810.13518-2-gilad.reti@gmail.com
The btf_dump test cannot access the original source files for comparison
when running the selftests out of tree, causing several failures:
awk: btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c: No such file or directory
...
Add those files to $(TEST_FILES) to have "make install" pick them up.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210113163319.1516382-6-jean-philippe@linaro.org
During an out-of-tree build, attempting to install the $(TEST_FILES)
into the $(OUTPUT) directory fails, because the objects were already
generated into $(OUTPUT):
rsync: [sender] link_stat "tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.o" failed: No such file or directory (2)
rsync: [sender] link_stat "tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tc_edt.o" failed: No such file or directory (2)
Use $(TEST_GEN_FILES) instead.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210113163319.1516382-4-jean-philippe@linaro.org
When building out-of-tree, the .skel.h files are generated into the
$(OUTPUT) directory, rather than $(CURDIR). Add $(OUTPUT) to the include
paths.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210113163319.1516382-3-jean-philippe@linaro.org
Build bpftool and resolve_btfids using the host toolchain when
cross-compiling, since they are executed during build to generate the
selftests. Add a host build directory in order to build both host and
target version of libbpf. Build host tools using $(HOSTCC) defined in
Makefile.include.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210113163319.1516382-2-jean-philippe@linaro.org
Add per-CPU variable to bpf_testmod.ko and use those from new selftest to
validate it works end-to-end.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112075520.4103414-8-andrii@kernel.org
If some of the subtests use module BTFs through ksyms, they will cause
bpf_prog to take a refcount on bpf_testmod module, which will prevent it from
successfully unloading. Module's refcnt is decremented when bpf_prog is freed,
which generally happens in RCU callback. So we need to trigger
syncronize_rcu() in the kernel, which can be achieved nicely with
membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED) or membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_GLOBAL) syscall.
So do that in kernel_sync_rcu() and make it available to other test inside the
test_progs. This synchronize_rcu() is called before attempting to unload
bpf_testmod.
Fixes: 9f7fa22589 ("selftests/bpf: Add bpf_testmod kernel module for testing")
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112075520.4103414-5-andrii@kernel.org
It was found in [1] that bpf_inode_storage_get helper did not check
the nullness of the passed owner ptr which caused an oops when
dereferenced. This change incorporates the example suggested in [1] into
the local storage selftest.
The test is updated to create a temporary directory instead of just
using a tempfile. In order to replicate the issue this copied rm binary
is renamed tiggering the inode_rename with a null pointer for the
new_inode. The logic to verify the setting and deletion of the inode
local storage of the old inode is also moved to this LSM hook.
The change also removes the copy_rm function and simply shells out
to copy files and recursively delete directories and consolidates the
logic of setting the initial inode storage to the bprm_committed_creds
hook and removes the file_open hook.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CANaYP3HWkH91SN=wTNO9FL_2ztHfqcXKX38SSE-JJ2voh+vssw@mail.gmail.com
Suggested-by: Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112075525.256820-2-kpsingh@kernel.org
'unistd.h' included in 'selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c' is
duplicated.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210105152047.6070-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
